![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Diamond Opinions |
![]() |
| P: 11/26/2006 4:43:36 PM | |
Tadeo Rough Rock Total Posts: 7 Last Post: 11/28/2006 Member Since: 9/16/2006 |
Hello, I'm just looking for any thoughts anyone might have on these ACA's I'm considering. I will of course confirm with WF if they are eye-clean or not. Diamond #1 0.733 ct H SI1 . Report: AGS . Shape: A Cut Above H&A . Carat: 0.733 . Depth %: 61.1 . Table %: 56.7 . Crown Angle: 34.8 . Crown %: 15.2 . Star : 50 . Pavilion Angle: 40.8 . Pavilion %: 43 . Lower Girdle %: 75 . Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted . Measurements: 5.79-5.82X3.55 . Light Performance: 0 . Polish: Ideal . Symmetry: Ideal . Culet: Pointed . Fluorescence: Negligible .733 Diamond #2 0.737 ct H SI1 . Report: AGS . Shape: A Cut Above H&A . Carat: 0.737 . Depth %: 61.4 . Table %: 56.9 . Crown Angle: 34.8 . Crown %: 15.1 . Star : 54 . Pavilion Angle: 40.7 . Pavilion %: 43 . Lower Girdle %: 77 . Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted . Measurements: 5.79-5.81X3.56 . Light Performance: 0 . Polish: Ideal . Symmetry: Ideal . Culet: Pointed . Fluorescence: Negligible .737 Diamond #3 0.732 ct G SI1 . Report: AGS . Shape: A Cut Above H&A . Carat: 0.732 . Depth %: 61.1 . Table %: 55.9 . Crown Angle: 34.7 . Crown %: 15.5 . Star : 51.2 . Pavilion Angle: 40.7 . Pavilion %: 42.9 . Lower Girdle %: 76.4 . Girdle: Thin Faceted . Measurements: 5.81-5.85X3.56 . Light Performance: 0 . Polish: Ideal . Symmetry: Ideal . Culet: Pointed . Fluorescence: Negligible .732 After months of looking and after pulling some more taste information out of my girl I've decided to put the stone in the Fine Line setting. I would appricate any opinions or any possible concerns about these three. Thanks
|
| Posted: 11/26/2006 4:43:36 PM | |
![]() |
There are 3 replies to this message. There are 3 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 11/26/2006 4:47:26 PM | |
|
diamondseeker2006 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 17,609 Last Post: 11/18/2009 Member Since: 1/11/2006 |
All ACA's are "safe" stones as far as I am concerned! But I did inquire about those two H stones for earrings, and one of them does have a dark inclusion, if that matters to you. I only wanted SI1's if they had white inclusions so I eliminated that pair. So you do need to ask, although the inclusion may be easy to see on the magnified photo, not sure.
|
| Posted: 11/26/2006 4:47:26 PM | |
| P: 11/26/2006 5:31:03 PM | |
|
Ellen Ideal Rock Total Posts: 22,894 Last Post: 11/6/2009 Member Since: 1/13/2006 |
I agree, as long as they're eyeclean, you cannot go wrong with an ACA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Posted: 11/26/2006 5:31:03 PM | |
| P: 11/26/2006 6:27:43 PM | |
|
EBree Ideal Rock Total Posts: 6,656 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 8/31/2005 |
Date: 11/26/2006 4:43:36 PM Author:Tadeo After months of looking and after pulling some more taste information out of my girl I've decided to put the stone in the Fine Line setting. I have a modified Fine Line setting, and it's even more gorgeous in person. Good choice!
|
| Posted: 11/26/2006 6:27:43 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives