![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Which Princess?? |
![]() |
| P: 11/3/2006 9:30:43 PM | |
tdiggity Rough Rock Total Posts: 65 Last Post: 6/5/2007 Member Since: 10/23/2006 |
Okay guys...I thought I liked these...I don't understand JACK about angles though...any thoughts? I like everything else about these stones so far... Certificate GIA Shape Princess Cut Select Idealâ„¢ Carat 1.07 Color H Clarity VS2 Regular Price $4,002 Length to Width Ratio 1.000 Measurements 5.39-5.39-4.04 Depth Percentage 75.0% Table Percentage 71.0% Girdle Somewhat thick to thick (2.6%) Culet None (Pointed) Polish Very Good Symmetry Very Good Fluorescence None (inert) Crn Angle: 48.9 Pav. Angle: 39.3 Pav. Height: 57.1% Crown Height: 15.2% ---OR--- Certificate GIA Shape Princess Cut Select Idealâ„¢ Carat 1.01 Color H Clarity VS2 Regular Price $4,018 Length to Width Ratio 1.013 Measurements 5.51-5.44-3.94 Depth Percentage 72.4% Table Percentage 67.0% Girdle Medium - Thick (3.1) Culet None (Pointed) Polish Excellent Symmetry Very Good Fluorescence None (inert) Crn Angle: 40.2 Pav. Angle: Not given Pav. Height: 56.3% Crown Height: Not given |
| Posted: 11/3/2006 9:30:43 PM | |
![]() |
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 11/3/2006 9:32:25 PM | |
JulieN Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,148 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 7/25/2005 |
no pictures, you've got JACK 2 for reasons in the air.
|
| Posted: 11/3/2006 9:32:25 PM | |
| P: 11/3/2006 10:36:06 PM | |
tdiggity Rough Rock Total Posts: 65 Last Post: 6/5/2007 Member Since: 10/23/2006 |
Still getting the pictures. I do have the GIA reports on them though
|
| Posted: 11/3/2006 10:36:06 PM | |
| P: 11/4/2006 2:28:44 AM | |
|
Cheekyprincess Cut Rock Total Posts: 133 Last Post: 3/22/2007 Member Since: 10/30/2006 |
1st one is a perfect square. Other than that I cannot offer much. I've no idea what the visible difference between excellnt and vg polish would be, but if the second one has a nicer finish I would probably choose it. A lot of people favcour that smaller size table.
|
| Posted: 11/4/2006 2:28:44 AM | |
| P: 11/4/2006 9:13:25 AM | |
|
moremoremore Ideal Rock Total Posts: 6,825 Last Post: 2/9/2009 Member Since: 3/15/2004 |
Not much we can do for you based on numbers alone...They would both seem to be nicely cut....So if you MAKE me pick one going blind which would not say you're getting the visually prettier stone....Although I want to mention that they are both going to look perfectly square and tht you'll see no different in the polish between the two.. I'd pick 2 simply b/c it faces up larger! But I want to SEE the stones and pick tht way ;) ______________________________ Stewart says: I'm good enough. I'm smart enough. And doggon'it, people like me. |
| Posted: 11/4/2006 9:13:25 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives