![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Comparing Princess Diamonds |
![]() |
| P: 2/26/2003 11:43:18 AM | |
imspqr Rough Rock Total Posts: 6 Last Post: 3/5/2003 Member Since: 2/26/2003 |
I have the following two GIA diamonds on hold for the same price: $9800. First, is $9800 a good deal; and second which is a better deal? Is the .17 size difference better than the depth difference of the first? Carat Co Cl Depth Tbl Gdl Cul Sym Pol Flr Measurements 1.77 E SI1 74.90% 76.00% med-thk no vg ex fnt 6.67x6.54x4.87 1.60 F SI1 68.90% 75.00% med-thk no g vg fnt 6.75x6.43x4.43 Thanks Chris
|
| Posted: 2/26/2003 11:43:18 AM | |
![]() |
There are 5 replies to this message. There are 5 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 2/26/2003 11:59:48 AM | |
|
oldminer Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,964 Last Post: 11/20/2009 Member Since: 9/4/2000 |
You ought to compare the light return with an Ideal-Scope to see which one has better light performance. You eyes will not readily detect which one is brighter, but the Ideal-Scope helps to make the difference very clear.
David S. Atlas |
| Posted: 2/26/2003 11:59:48 AM | |
| P: 2/26/2003 12:00:47 PM | |
|
DiamondOptics.com Cut Rock Total Posts: 380 Last Post: 3/15/2006 Member Since: 6/27/2002 |
I would definately lean more towards the 1.77ct. 1.) Better color 2.) Better polish 3.) Better symmetry 4.) Larger 5.) Very square Kirk
|
| Posted: 2/26/2003 12:00:47 PM | |
| P: 2/26/2003 12:08:12 PM | |
barry Cut Rock Total Posts: 440 Last Post: 12/1/2003 Member Since: 3/22/2001 |
Good point, Dave. It is difficult to evaluate Princess Cuts solely on the numbers. Devices that measure light leakage (IdealScope) and light output(BrillianceScope) will give you a better 'read'. Barry www.superbcert.com
|
| Posted: 2/26/2003 12:08:12 PM | |
| P: 2/26/2003 2:18:12 PM | |
Giangi Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,530 Last Post: 10/29/2006 Member Since: 1/23/2003 |
I prefer the 1.77 as well, although both have quite large tables... Giangi _____________ |
| Posted: 2/26/2003 2:18:12 PM | |
| P: 2/26/2003 3:52:53 PM | |
imspqr Rough Rock Total Posts: 6 Last Post: 3/5/2003 Member Since: 2/26/2003 |
OK; so the 1.77 appears on paper to be the better of the two althoguh I thought the 1.60 had more shine to it. Also, what am I to make of the "sticker price" of the two? I was told that the sticker price is the "market value" of the diamond. The strange thing was the price for the 1.77 was $19K and the price for the 1.60 was $27K. Any comments on what is printed on the sticker/UPC label? Both stores are reputable dealers in the area. Thanks
|
| Posted: 2/26/2003 3:52:53 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives