projectwedding.com/
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » What is the proper ratio of table to depth on a radiant?


  

 What is the proper ratio of table to depth on a radiant?

P:  8/24/2006 6:32:21 PM  
s1203372
s1203372

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 11
Last Post: 10/16/2006
Member Since: 8/20/2006
 
I am interested in a radiant for my girlfriend, and I have looked over the numbers given in the advanced tutorial, but I was wondering if someone could shed further insight.  Should I assume that any diamond with numbers falling within the range given is worth looking at?  For instance, how about if the table is 60 and the depth is 67, or the table is 67 and the depth is 60.  If I understand what I have read, the former should generally be a more firey diamond, and the latter a brighter diamond just from depth, but is there a ratio of one to the other that can be used to rule out diamonds?  Thanks!
Posted:  8/24/2006 6:32:21 PM

 There are 8 replies to this message.  There are 8 replies on this page.

P: 8/25/2006 12:01:39 AM
Eva17
Eva17

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,005
Last Post: 9/25/2009
Member Since: 7/14/2006
 
Does she prefer a rectangle or square?

Posted:  8/25/2006 12:01:39 AM
P: 8/25/2006 4:17:02 AM
Lorelei
Lorelei

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 34,228
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 4/30/2005
 
Date: 8/24/2006 6:32:21 PM
Author:s1203372
I am interested in a radiant for my girlfriend, and I have looked over the numbers given in the advanced tutorial, but I was wondering if someone could shed further insight. Should I assume that any diamond with numbers falling within the range given is worth looking at? For instance, how about if the table is 60 and the depth is 67, or the table is 67 and the depth is 60. If I understand what I have read, the former should generally be a more firey diamond, and the latter a brighter diamond just from depth, but is there a ratio of one to the other that can be used to rule out diamonds? Thanks!


Welcome to PS

Coda is good with Radiants and she should be online soon.  She has a chart she uses, but I am not sure which one it is,  she will be able to help you with this.









Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be...
- Stephanie M Thorn

Posted:  8/25/2006 4:17:02 AM
P: 8/25/2006 4:26:13 AM
kcoursolle
kcoursolle

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 10,344
Last Post: 10/14/2009
Member Since: 1/21/2006
 

     Hi there, somehow I missed this thread.  I am a fellow radiant lover as well!  I am not an expert, but I own a radiant and when I was looking I did quite a bit of research and viewing at B & M's.  There were quite a few uglies out there...but finding a good one is well worth it.
       Here is the chart Lorelei is talking about.  I'm sure coda will chime in shortly, and she can definitely help.  Radiants are a little more difficult than rounds or other cuts.  It's harder to find radiants that are well-cut compared to a round.  In general, it helps to see a radiant with your own eyes as well.  What kind of radiant are you looking for, carat size, rectangular vs. square, budget, etc.?      



http://www.gemappraisers.com/oldcutgraderules.asp
 

Posted:  8/25/2006 4:26:13 AM
P: 8/25/2006 4:38:08 AM
Lorelei
Lorelei

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 34,228
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 4/30/2005
 
Date: 8/25/2006 4:26:13 AM
Author: kcoursolle

Hi there, somehow I missed this thread. I am a fellow radiant lover as well! I am not an expert, but I own a radiant and when I was looking I did quite a bit of research and viewing at B & M's. There were quite a few uglies out there...but finding a good one is well worth it.
Here is the chart Lorelei is talking about. I'm sure coda will chime in shortly, and she can definitely help. Radiants are a little more difficult than rounds or other cuts. It's harder to find radiants that are well-cut compared to a round, but well worth it. In general, it helps to see a radiant with your own eyes as well. What kind of radiant are you looking for, carat size, rectangular vs. square, budget, etc.?



http://www.gemappraisers.com/oldcutgraderules.asp



Thats the chart Koursie









Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be...
- Stephanie M Thorn

Posted:  8/25/2006 4:38:08 AM
P: 8/25/2006 6:34:58 AM
coda72
coda72

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,096
Last Post: 11/21/2009
Member Since: 3/1/2005
 
Well, generally speaking the table should be 1-3% less than the depth.  But there's no real standard for radiants, so this isn't set in stone.  Also, people have different preferences.  Some people like a table which is slightly larger than the depth.  I myself have a radiant where the table is slightly smaller than the depth and it's a very fiery stone.  What you really need to do is go to a jewelry store, look at some radiants and see what your preference is.  It seems like it's harder to find a radiant with a smaller table than depth, so you may not see as many of those.  But it is best to see them in person if you can. 

Posted:  8/25/2006 6:34:58 AM
P: 8/25/2006 11:40:50 AM
s1203372
s1203372

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 11
Last Post: 10/16/2006
Member Since: 8/20/2006
 
Thanks for all the replies!  I must say, I have found this forum to be by far the most informative place on the web for really learning about diamonds.

As for the stone for my girlfriend, I am not so concerned with carat weight as such, more with the spread of the diamond.  She prefers rectangles with a ratio of around 1.5, and dimensions of 7.5x5 or so.  The size going up or down a little would be fine.  The plan is to set this in a 3-stone configuration with two half moons of 5mm diameter, and I want the proportions to be right.  Here is an image scaled correctly for a 7.5x5 radiant with 5mm half moons, although the actual dimensions may not be correct depending on the screen resolution:
 


Posted:  8/25/2006 11:40:50 AM
P: 8/25/2006 12:17:15 PM
Rhino
Rhino

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 4,865
Last Post: 11/22/2009
Member Since: 3/29/2001
 
Hi  s,

While radiants can come in certain shapes ranging from 1:1 squares to all varieties of rectangular shapes there are two general appearances you'll find amongst them which will primarily be dictated by the proportions.

One is an appearance that accentuates many tiny pin flashes of white light.  Fire is not strong in these types generally but when you do bring the stone into spot lighting environments you can see the small sparks of fire come from within the stone.   This is a look that you will generally get with radiants of the rectangular flavor and generally have tables that are greater than their total depths.

The other is an appearance that does contribute to what many would consider a higher brightness, greater contrast and stronger fire.  These types can be found amongst rectangular types but are much harder to locate.  These types are generally found in the more squarer shapes and instead of of emphasis on pin flash, have more of an emphasis on broad flash.  These types of stones generally have tables that are smaller than their total depths but that is not a hard fast rule.

A similar comparison can also be drawn in other fancy shapes such as cushions. 

The only way to determine which of these appearances you or your fiance will enjoy most is by going out and looking at both side by side.  We've seen consumers go either way although when viewing this comparison more tend to lean towards the 2nd appearance I've described.  I'd show you some photography that demonstrates this but I'm punching this out from a remote location and will not be back at my store till next week.  Till then beat the street.  See as many as you can.  Note the appearances and most importantly the one that you or your fiance enjoys most.

Hope that helps.

Rhino
Good Old Gold

Posted:  8/25/2006 12:17:15 PM
P: 8/25/2006 12:29:42 PM
s1203372
s1203372

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 11
Last Post: 10/16/2006
Member Since: 8/20/2006
 
Some photos of each would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks for your help, Rhino!

Posted:  8/25/2006 12:29:42 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« When it came to picking out your engagement ring (or if you a... «» appraising right after purchase »
Next Topics
Am I getting a good deal with this diamond? Custom made or designer? This is what's going on...(long) Wow! How to get your diamond sparkling clean! How often do designers and vendors get new settings? do any diamonds look white in all lighting situations? Please Help - Clarity Enhanced Diamond Purchase How much fluorescence to see blue in sunlight? Anyone here heard of ghoshiexports? I would like some help please... I GIVE UP! Help with 5 stone setting please Any thoughts on these 3 ct princesses? Thoughts on these Budget!!! Is this a good princess cut? Three stone E-ring Upgrade Story and Review – Mark Morrell/GOG/RockDoc Need to pick one... pulling my hair out!!!! Which profile do you like best? (and why?) What does a stone with medium blue flourescence look like Black Diamonds Help buying an ASSCHER... Help on 3 stone ring I'm about to buy How to tell if your diamond is severely DUG OUT? Hawaii appraisals? Thoughts.. Help on a trade-in Please - need advice on EGL round diamond Diamond Novice: Some questions... Kudos to Whiteflash for Beautiful ACA Diamond Bracelet grading questions finally, my asscher ring is done. pics~~~

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives