|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » I think this is the one!
|
|
 |
I think this is the one! |
 |
| P: 8/4/2006 11:25:17 AM | |
treepop Rough Rock Total Posts: 45 Last Post: 8/27/2006 Member Since: 7/12/2006 |
Shape: Round Carat weight: 0.72 Cut: Ideal Color: F Clarity: VS2 Certificate: AGS Depth: 61.1% Table: 56.3% Polish: Ideal Symmetry: Ideal Girdle: Thin to medium Culet: None Fluorescence: Neglible Measurements: 5.74*5.78*3.52 Crown Angle: 34.5° Crown %: 15.1 Pavillion Angle: 40.5° Pavillion %: 42.5 it has a hearts and arrows designed cut It scores a 0.4 on the HCA. What are your thoughts? ALSO I Messed up the firts ones Numbers..its .723 ct weight |
| Posted: 8/4/2006 11:25:17 AM | |
|
There are 10 replies to this message. There are 10 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 8/4/2006 11:33:16 AM | |
Regular Guy Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,320 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 7/7/2004 |
I love the F VS 2 AGS. I presume AGS000? Haven't you been looking at a lot with similar specs? Do you have pictures? (I'm not a great one for reading them with confidence, but others are) Preliminarily, looks good! Ira (Ruffles have Ridges) Z. |
| Posted: 8/4/2006 11:33:16 AM | |
| P: 8/4/2006 11:34:51 AM | |
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
bit on the shallow/shallow side but with ideal optical and physical symmetry it can rock. Do you have a heart image and an ideal-scope image and a sarin scan? ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 8/4/2006 11:34:51 AM | |
| P: 8/4/2006 12:05:50 PM | |
|
treepop Rough Rock Total Posts: 45 Last Post: 8/27/2006 Member Since: 7/12/2006 |
The other one I am considering but is a WHOPPING $400 more! is this one. Shape: Round Carat weight: 0.72 Cut: Ideal Color: F Clarity: VS2 Certificate: AGS Depth: 61.6% Table: 56.3% Polish: Ideal Symmetry: Ideal Girdle: Thin to medium Culet: None Fluorescence: Neglible Measurements: 5.75*5.77*3.55 Crown Angle: 34.7° Crown %: 15.2 Pavillion Angle: 40.7° Pavillion %: 43 It scored a 1.1 on the HCA...I am under the impression that lower is better(generally) As for pics and such on the first stone. I really don't have any that I can show you. It is totally eye clean of course. When you say it's shallow/shallow is it a "stone of death" shallow? I heard that stated on the interview on price scope when they went to new york.
|
| Posted: 8/4/2006 12:05:50 PM | |
| P: 8/4/2006 12:14:31 PM | |
|
treepop Rough Rock Total Posts: 45 Last Post: 8/27/2006 Member Since: 7/12/2006 |
As for the AGS 0 0 0...the funny thing is..both are ideal ideal ideal...but the seocond ones DQD actually has light performance 0 proportions 0 etc...while the 1st one only says ags ideal 0 and then says Ideal cut polish symytry proportions but no 0....I am assuming they are the same. But both are dqd's.
|
| Posted: 8/4/2006 12:14:31 PM | |
| P: 8/4/2006 12:15:25 PM | |
|
Regular Guy Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,320 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 7/7/2004 |
It scored a 1.1 on the HCA...I am under the impression that lower is better(generally) Well, from what I read here, generally, it is not better than a 1.1 (a lower score like .4). But infrequenly, it is significantly better. I think the only way to discern the difference is with some sort of expert read...either with pictures, or a precision scan of some sort. The discussion here may help (I think it helped me). Ira (Ruffles have Ridges) Z. |
| Posted: 8/4/2006 12:15:25 PM | |
| P: 8/4/2006 12:41:33 PM | |
diamondseeker2006 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 17,609 Last Post: 11/18/2009 Member Since: 1/11/2006 |
They both look like winners. Are you able to see them both in person?
|
| Posted: 8/4/2006 12:41:33 PM | |
| P: 8/4/2006 7:54:51 PM | |
|
treepop Rough Rock Total Posts: 45 Last Post: 8/27/2006 Member Since: 7/12/2006 |
so I guess you got that rock ;)
|
| Posted: 8/4/2006 7:54:51 PM | |
| P: 8/4/2006 8:17:16 PM | |
|
diamondseeker2006 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 17,609 Last Post: 11/18/2009 Member Since: 1/11/2006 |
Date: 8/4/2006 7:54:51 PM Author: treepop so I guess you got that rock ;) Nope! It did sell this afternoon, though! That's why it's really dangerous to post specific stones on here without putting them on hold. There are many, many lurkers who read the recommendations. Since I was looking at 2 different pair of stones, it was especially risky that one of either pair would sell. And one of them did! So I hope you decided on one! Did you?
|
| Posted: 8/4/2006 8:17:16 PM | |
| P: 8/5/2006 6:50:16 PM | |
|
treepop Rough Rock Total Posts: 45 Last Post: 8/27/2006 Member Since: 7/12/2006 |
I got one :).....I am really excited.....it's gunna be a beutifull stone. I am not going to specify which one exactly since it's not 100% aquired yet. I really hope everything goes through. WOOT!
|
| Posted: 8/5/2006 6:50:16 PM | |
| P: 8/5/2006 7:10:27 PM | |
|
diamondseeker2006 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 17,609 Last Post: 11/18/2009 Member Since: 1/11/2006 |
That's great! And it's fine if it was the one I was looking at. I had two pair of stones that were possibilities.
|
| Posted: 8/5/2006 7:10:27 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
