|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Pricescope café »
 » Hangout
»  » Which watch would you choose?
|
| Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
|
 |
Which watch would you choose? |
 |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:00:01 PM | |
mindchanger Rough Rock Total Posts: 10 Last Post: 7/8/2006 Member Since: 5/2/2006 |
I am down to two choices. Two totally different looks and I am leaning towards one but can't pull the trigger. They are reasonably similar in price What one would you pick? and why? They are both solid 18K white gold with diamonds. Option 1
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:00:01 PM | |
|
There are 35 replies to this message. There are 30 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 7/6/2006 4:00:40 PM | |
|
mindchanger Rough Rock Total Posts: 10 Last Post: 7/8/2006 Member Since: 5/2/2006 |
Option 2
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:00:40 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:08:35 PM | |
FacetFire Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,878 Last Post: 6/23/2009 Member Since: 6/27/2006 |
When are you planning to wear it? They are both beautiful, but #1 seems dressy to me, while #2 seems like more of an everyday watch.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:08:35 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:11:46 PM | |
SanDiegoLady Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,231 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 7/6/2005 |
I like the second one. For me personally, it would "go" with more of my outfits. The first is pretty but looks like a dinner watch. Good luck! :)
  |
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:11:46 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:16:47 PM | |
Gypsy Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,306 Last Post: 11/20/2009 Member Since: 8/9/2005 |
1 is more feminine and yes, dressier. 2) is more substantial and more casual. Depends on what you plan to wear it with. I love 1 and if I had an everydsy watch... 1 would be my choice for a dressier watch.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:16:47 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:19:19 PM | |
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,918 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
The second one. It's classic and elegant. The first one is very nice but too dressy for everyday wear IMHO.
____________________________ |
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:19:19 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:22:00 PM | |
Scintillating Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,128 Last Post: 7/24/2009 Member Since: 8/10/2005 |
Number 2, classic and goes with most things. Scintillating...
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:22:00 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:39:32 PM | |
|
mindchanger Rough Rock Total Posts: 10 Last Post: 7/8/2006 Member Since: 5/2/2006 |
I really want this to be an everyday watch. While I have one nice one already I am ready for a change. The second option is closer (but nicer) than my current watch. The first option is so beautiful but I rarely get dressed up so would need to wear it casual too. In person, it is fairly understated. In some ways, it is more subtle than option 2 but definitely dressier. The responses seem overwhelmingly #2. Hmmm, that wasn't the way I was leaning. Thanks for everyone's honesty.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:39:32 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:46:46 PM | |
widget Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,254 Last Post: 12/20/2008 Member Since: 11/12/2004 |
Well, I vote for #1!!! I love it! (Who's is it, anyway?) I think of it as more feminine than #2, but subdued enough to be worn everyday...I really love it! (Oops, guess I already said that....) widget ETA: The only thing that would be a problem for me with #1 is that the elongated shape and short hands make it harder to tell what exact time it is...
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:46:46 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 4:58:42 PM | |
Dee*Jay Ideal Rock Total Posts: 6,491 Last Post: 9/23/2009 Member Since: 3/26/2006 |
I like #1 a lot but it seems a bit *much* for everyday wear. The specific aspect that puts it over the top for me are the little diamonds on the things that attach to the "stirrups." For some reason if you take those stones off but still have the diamonds on and around the face I'm OK with it for everday. (Who know's how Dee Jay's brain works... ) Or, is it an option to get it with only diamonds on the face and none around the bezel? That would be even better IMHO. Otherwise I'd go with #2.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 4:58:42 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 5:32:12 PM | |
decodelighted Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,625 Last Post: 11/16/2009 Member Since: 7/27/2005 |
I like the deco-feel of number one but it seems a bit, um, mature. And quite "pointed" for everyday comfort, not catching on things etc. #2 is almost exactly like my own watch in shape (sans gold & diamonds - darn it) & I've had it for 9 years ... still classic, still love it. Oddly more "youthful" to me too.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 5:32:12 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 7:23:42 PM | |
VegasAngel Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,449 Last Post: 11/10/2009 Member Since: 10/12/2005 |
I like both but my vote goes to number #1. I say wear it everyday unless you are rough with your pieces.
"Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly." GK Chesterton |
| Posted: 7/6/2006 7:23:42 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 7:37:54 PM | |
FireGoddess Ideal Rock Total Posts: 12,145 Last Post: 3/23/2009 Member Since: 1/25/2005 |
I vote for #1, dressy or not. Love it!! 
 |
| Posted: 7/6/2006 7:37:54 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 8:00:15 PM | |
codex57 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,492 Last Post: 1/21/2008 Member Since: 12/18/2004 |
#1. #2 looks slightly too masculine. Take away the diamonds and I would look normal wearing it.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 8:00:15 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 8:21:59 PM | |
sparkly_stars Ideal Rock Total Posts: 576 Last Post: 10/28/2009 Member Since: 7/26/2005 |
i love number 1 !!! that was the one i fell for when i saw them all.. then when read the responses, i saw what they meant, but then you said "i have one sort of like number two" well number 1 is a lot more different, and would definitely be my pick! :)
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 8:21:59 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 9:09:33 PM | |
diamondseeker2006 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 17,609 Last Post: 11/18/2009 Member Since: 1/11/2006 |
I agree with those who said that #1 is more dressy while #2 is more everyday. My everyday watch is similar to #2 except it has a round face. I suppose it depends on how dressed up you are in your daily life/job.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 9:09:33 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 9:32:41 PM | |
qtiekiki Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,666 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 11/14/2004 |
My vote is for #2. #1 can be everyday wear if it fits your style; I don't think it's dressier, just more feminine. I am just not into the feminine style watches. On the other hand, my mom would probably love #1; she has something similar without the diamonds.
__________________________ |
| Posted: 7/6/2006 9:32:41 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 9:35:09 PM | |
lizz Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,241 Last Post: 12/15/2008 Member Since: 6/7/2005 |
My watch looks almost exactly like #2, but I like #1 better. It's just so elegant and feminine.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 9:35:09 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 10:01:24 PM | |
february2003bride Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,100 Last Post: 11/6/2009 Member Since: 1/18/2005 |
#2 is my fav :)
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 10:01:24 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 10:18:41 PM | |
Sparkster Ideal Rock Total Posts: 582 Last Post: 4/11/2008 Member Since: 6/1/2004 |
They are both beautiful watches. I would go for no 1 for a dress watch and no. 2 for every day wear.
_______________________ |
| Posted: 7/6/2006 10:18:41 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 10:26:09 PM | |
diamondfan Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,998 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 6/17/2005 |
I think the second is more wearable, to be honest. the first looks like a very dressy vintage type watch, maybe too delicate for daily wear...
**************************** |
| Posted: 7/6/2006 10:26:09 PM | |
| P: 7/6/2006 11:45:39 PM | |
|
FacetFire Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,878 Last Post: 6/23/2009 Member Since: 6/27/2006 |
I definitely vote for #2. It is SO much better for everyday use. It will stand up to wear better, and it's still delicate and pretty.
|
| Posted: 7/6/2006 11:45:39 PM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 12:12:03 AM | |
portoar Ideal Rock Total Posts: 562 Last Post: 2/14/2007 Member Since: 10/16/2005 |
I like #2, but . . . dare I say it? I would get it without the diamonds. I like #2, but it doesn't look like it would be comfortable for everyday wear. If you're only looking for a dress watch for special occasions, then go w/#1. Which do you like better?
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 12:12:03 AM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 12:41:22 AM | |
Kay Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,454 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 2/20/2003 |
I'd go with #1. I love the elegant elongated face. #1 is more feminine. Although it would be a fabulous cocktail/dinner watch, it would also look great with a suit or other nicer clothing, but would be too much with jeans and a T-shirt.
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 12:41:22 AM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 9:15:02 AM | |
lvnut Cut Rock Total Posts: 244 Last Post: 10/23/2009 Member Since: 5/25/2006 |
Mindchanger - They are both very pretty but watch #1 definitely looks more delicate and dressy. Watch #2 is a Concord Veneto - it is available in a rectangular face if you like that look better. I have it in 18K yellow gold with diamonds with the rectangular face - it is much prettier in person than that picture shows. Did you see it with the rectangular face as well?
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 9:15:02 AM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 9:38:13 AM | |
|
mindchanger Rough Rock Total Posts: 10 Last Post: 7/8/2006 Member Since: 5/2/2006 |
lvnut, You are right that #2 is the veneto. It is actually the veneto mini. I have ridiculously small wrists so the mini works for me better. The regular veneto overwhelms me. Sounds like you love your watch. I agree with you that the picture doesn't do it justice. Still debating.
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 9:38:13 AM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 9:43:58 AM | |
MINE!! Ideal Rock Total Posts: 3,287 Last Post: 1/22/2007 Member Since: 2/25/2005 |
I vote #1 too. I agree that it looks more dressy than the 2nd. But not one said that a pair of jeans could not be sexy and dressy. I like how #1 looks.
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 9:43:58 AM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 11:00:01 AM | |
|
lvnut Cut Rock Total Posts: 244 Last Post: 10/23/2009 Member Since: 5/25/2006 |
Mindchanger - I do love my Veneto, but like you I have very small wrists. The watch I actually wear the most is my Ebel classic wave. It has a much smaller face and the band is thinner. Have you checked them out? The band is very comfortable and I literally wear it everywhere - working out, at the beach and out to dinner. Mine also has the diamond dial and bezel, but the diamonds are very small so it doesn't look like too much during the day. Just a thought that might help you out!
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 11:00:01 AM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 1:28:05 PM | |
|
mindchanger Rough Rock Total Posts: 10 Last Post: 7/8/2006 Member Since: 5/2/2006 |
lvnut: I checked it out. Very pretty. All I need is more choices!! Hmmm, I may need to just go watch shopping a few days and try on a ton. The ebel included. I really do like the concords though.
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 1:28:05 PM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 2:02:35 PM | |
|
Julian Ideal Rock Total Posts: 724 Last Post: 2/5/2007 Member Since: 9/5/2004 |
#1 is pretty, but it's also pretty "right now." Know what I mean? It will look dated in a few years. The other one is a classic and will always look expensive & elegant. It also looks more "real" and substantial... like a Cartier tank. Right now, I think you'd be happier with #1 but a year later you may be tired of it and long for the classic!  Oh! I forgot to add -- maybe you COULD get #1 and when you tire of it, put on a thin croc band. That would keep it timeless, too.
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 2:02:35 PM | |
| P: 7/7/2006 2:20:43 PM | |
old-fashioned girl Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,621 Last Post: 10/31/2008 Member Since: 8/1/2005 |
I definitely would choose #1. Before I read some of the responses, I didn't even think of which was dressier. I just thought #1 was more feminine and much prettier, but I suppose I have a tendency toward more dressy things anyway. And I'm somewhat clueless about fashion; I'd probably have gone ahead and worn it with denim. Also, you said, "In person, it is fairly understated. In some ways, it is more subtle than option 2." So to me it sounds like it wouldn't be a problem (i.e. wouldn't necessarily look "too dressy"). Also, I must admit when I have done polls on here, I too find myself leaning (sometimes not until after I start the poll or ask the question) one way or another. To me, that often is the answer regardless of the feedback, unless the feedback gives a compelling reason why not, like "option [that I like] is ugly." But that's not the case here, so I think, if you really like #1, and you already have one something like option #2, go with your heart and get #1. Just like folks often say about the "what will people think of my e-ring?" type questions, but even more so with a watch - people may not even notice your watch. I can't say I ever find myself saying, "that person's watch is way too dressy for the jeans and t-shirt they're wearing!"  Most likely if I noticed it at all, I'd find myself thinking, "that's a pretty watch!" ETA: I personally don't see anything potentially dated about it ("now") but as I said I am somewhat clueless about fashion.
|
| Posted: 7/7/2006 2:20:43 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
