since1910.com
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » How big will this look?


  

 How big will this look?

P:  6/21/2006 12:29:59 PM  
scott32
scott32

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 23
Last Post: 7/21/2006
Member Since: 6/21/2006
 
First off, I am looking for an exceptionally well cut stone in the 1.5-2.0 range.  My soon to be fiance works in the health care profession, and I do not want it to be too ostentatious.  I have a 1.81 ct H VVS2 AGS 0 H & A that I have my eye on, and plan on setting in a solitaire setting.  I am purchasing the stone loose, so I will need to find someone to set it.  Perhaps MM.  She is 115lbs and has a size 5.5 finger.  How big will this look on her.  SHould I go closer to a 1.5 and step up the color for the same price?  I think 2ct will ldef look too big.  SHe spends some time working with residents and in the clinic which is composed of uninsured pts who get free care and have very little income.  THoughts??  Oh, and the H? I was thing of not going below a G or even an F.  Her sister has a 2ct D, VS1 but not of ideal proportions. close though.   I am sure she will hold her stone up to it.  At Tiffany's, I could not consistently tell the difference between an D and an H in a 2ct, though there was a 30000 price difference.  Even side by side it was VERY hard.  THanks tons..got about a month to get this together.  I may just grab that stone this weekend....
Posted:  6/21/2006 12:29:59 PM

 There are 15 replies to this message.  There are 15 replies on this page.

P: 6/21/2006 12:36:31 PM
Mara
Mara

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 27,922
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 10/30/2002
 
a 1.81 on a size 5.5 finger i think is a great size, esp if you feel like 2c is too big. i personally like bigger so i love the idea of a 1.81 instead of a 1.5, but i'm sure that anything between 1.5 and 2 for a non-ostentatious look would be fine. go with your gut, you know her best and know what she likes. good luck!

________________________________

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

-Albert Einstein

Posted:  6/21/2006 12:36:31 PM
P: 6/21/2006 12:37:34 PM
decodelighted
decodelighted

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 8,625
Last Post: 11/16/2009
Member Since: 7/27/2005
 
It sounds PERFECT!!!! Have it set very, very low though ... not so low that a wedding band can't sit flush, but as low as it can go. You might even buy the wedding band at the same time as prices are so crazy right now (if you're thinking platinum).

I have a GIA H in a much more open cut shape (shows more color) and I LOVE LOVE LOVE IT - wouldn't trade for "F" or "D" or anything! With an Ideal Cut RB --- you probably won't see a dif. at all between her sister's D ... and the cut is gonna blow it away and make it look larger than the 2 carat ..

COME BACK WITH PIX, YA HEAR!!!!??

Posted:  6/21/2006 12:37:34 PM
P: 6/21/2006 1:11:55 PM
diamondlove
diamondlove

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 409
Last Post: 2/7/2007
Member Since: 4/18/2006
 
hi Scott,

My bf and I just went through a similar comparison between an I/H vs. F/G and we went with the I because it was a really white I and due to the brilliance of the H&A/ideal cut it sparkled so much the color wasn't even an issue AT ALL once I saw it in person.

I COULD see a difference in color if I put the stone next to a D or E color but that's if you are looking at it right next to each other but not if you are just eyeballing it by itself.

There are people who are more color sensitive than I am but I did do a lot of research bc the bf wanted to make sure I couldn't tell a difference so I also went to Tiffany's and a few other stores and I couldn't tell a difference when I was at Tiffany's nor when I was looking at Ideal cut stones that was firey. I COULD tell a difference when I was comparing average/poor cut stones.

hope that helps,

DL

Posted:  6/21/2006 1:11:55 PM
P: 6/21/2006 1:29:34 PM
Virginia
Virginia

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 999
Last Post: 7/14/2006
Member Since: 6/8/2005
 
I have a 1.71 on a 5.5 hand and I think it is perfect, not small but I dont really view it as "big" if that makes any sense! I also have an H and think the color is great. I am color sensitive, so I would not go lower than that but many love even lower colored stones and they look amazing. Good Luck!

Posted:  6/21/2006 1:29:34 PM
P: 6/21/2006 1:33:50 PM
diamondlove
diamondlove

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 409
Last Post: 2/7/2007
Member Since: 4/18/2006
 
oops sorry Scott, I forgot to address your primary question about the size. I think it's a personal preference on what is TOO big but my ring size is a 3.25 and the stone my bf purchased for me is also a 1.81 and I think it is the PERFECT size.

Posted:  6/21/2006 1:33:50 PM
P: 6/21/2006 6:04:21 PM
SanDiegoLady
SanDiegoLady

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,229
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 7/6/2005
 
Date: 6/21/2006 12:29:59 PM
Author:scott32
First off, I am looking for an exceptionally well cut stone in the 1.5-2.0 range. My soon to be fiance works in the health care profession, and I do not want it to be too ostentatious. I have a 1.81 ct H VVS2 AGS 0 H & A that I have my eye on, and plan on setting in a solitaire setting. I am purchasing the stone loose, so I will need to find someone to set it. Perhaps MM. She is 115lbs and has a size 5.5 finger. How big will this look on her. SHould I go closer to a 1.5 and step up the color for the same price? I think 2ct will ldef look too big. SHe spends some time working with residents and in the clinic which is composed of uninsured pts who get free care and have very little income. THoughts?? Oh, and the H? I was thing of not going below a G or even an F. Her sister has a 2ct D, VS1 but not of ideal proportions. close though. I am sure she will hold her stone up to it. At Tiffany's, I could not consistently tell the difference between an D and an H in a 2ct, though there was a 30000 price difference. Even side by side it was VERY hard. THanks tons..got about a month to get this together. I may just grab that stone this weekend....

As one who works in the healthcare field myself, my own diamond is 1.51 and.. I can tell you it is by far not the biggest on the block. lol. I know several women who work with me who's diamonds are 2.+ carats.. 1.81 is a lovely size stone and not at all ostentatious.. My future upgrade will be a 2ct.. in about five years. Its as big as I will go for my setting as I will keep the original setting. My finger size is just under a 5 (between 4.75 & 5 exactly lol).

Have fun!








Posted:  6/21/2006 6:04:21 PM
P: 6/21/2006 6:23:31 PM
jazmine
jazmine

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 2,013
Last Post: 11/17/2009
Member Since: 7/12/2005
 
I don't know about the health care profession but my finger is the same size as hers (5.5), I am 111 pounds, and my diamond is 2 carats, plus a halo. NOT too big.

Posted:  6/21/2006 6:23:31 PM
P: 6/21/2006 6:41:18 PM
FireGoddess
FireGoddess

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 12,145
Last Post: 3/23/2009
Member Since: 1/25/2005
 
I think the size is great and a low profile (read: not too high) setting would be perfect!  About the D versus H side by side thing....I could definitely tell a difference between the 2 side by side in person so....if you can't perhaps you're not color sensitive.  But is she?






Posted:  6/21/2006 6:41:18 PM
P: 6/21/2006 7:03:37 PM
dbgaap
dbgaap

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 930
Last Post: 7/25/2006
Member Since: 2/12/2004
 
Any way you can get her input?  For me I'd rather have the smaller stone with the higher color.
But I would not turn away the stone you have described!!!
It sounds very nice and not too big.

Posted:  6/21/2006 7:03:37 PM
P: 6/21/2006 7:21:19 PM
SuzyQZ
SuzyQZ

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,110
Last Post: 4/23/2009
Member Since: 2/20/2006
 
Date: 6/21/2006 12:29:59 PM
Author:scott32
First off, I am looking for an exceptionally well cut stone in the 1.5-2.0 range. My soon to be fiance works in the health care profession, and I do not want it to be too ostentatious.
** You can minimize the look of your diamond by setting it low and using a classic simple, non-blingy (read no pave) setting.
 
I have a 1.81 ct H VVS2 AGS 0 H & A that I have my eye on, and plan on setting in a solitaire setting. I am purchasing the stone loose, so I will need to find someone to set it. Perhaps MM. She is 115lbs and has a size 5.5 finger. How big will this look on her.
** I'm 5'4", 120lbs and size 5.5.  I have a 1.47 princess cut solitare that looks perfect. Not too big, not too small. 

SHould I go closer to a 1.5 and step up the color for the same price?
** I'd step up the color only if you think she'll be able to tell the difference.  An AGS 0 in an "H" color should be just spectacular! And will hide the subtle color differences.

I think 2ct will def look too big.
** If she thinks 2cts is too big, then it's too big.  Personally I think a 2ct is a perfectly normal size, not ostentatious at all! But you want to give her something she's comfortable with.  Just remember that diamonds have a tendency to "shrink" in size as the wearer gets used to them.  What starts out as being the biggest ring ever, somehow manages to become "average" very quickly.

SHe spends some time working with residents and in the clinic which is composed of uninsured pts who get free care and have very little income. THoughts??
** Go low key on the setting to minimize the bling effect.

Oh, and the H? I was thing of not going below a G or even an F. Her sister has a 2ct D, VS1 but not of ideal proportions. close though. I am sure she will hold her stone up to it. At Tiffany's, I could not consistently tell the difference between an D and an H in a 2ct, though there was a 30000 price difference. Even side by side it was VERY hard.
** Are you color sensitive?  Is she? If you can't see the differences in diamond colors very easily, you are like many (dare I say most?) people.  If you want to "hedge" your bet go up to a "G".  How important is it to you (read $$$) that it be a D, E or F?? Especially when you, and most others won't be able to tell the difference.  Your exceptionally cut diamond is what helps you tremendously in the color dept.!  You can always send to an appraiser and pay a little extra for some big piece of mind.
 
THanks tons..got about a month to get this together. I may just grab that stone this weekend....
** My caveat: I'm just an average Joe.  No expert, just a diamond lover, so this is just MHO. 
Good luck on your purchase, I'm looking forward to seeing your pictures!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There are just some things you don't 'guess' about.... a womans age, her weight, or the size of her diamond!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SuzyQZ

Posted:  6/21/2006 7:21:19 PM
P: 6/21/2006 10:10:34 PM
scott32
scott32

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 23
Last Post: 7/21/2006
Member Since: 6/21/2006
 
The 1.81 is an Isee2 with a score of 9.5, three highs on the gemex report.  it has some major bling.  on the helium all angles of both pavillion and crown vary by only .1mm.  It is an exceptionally cut stone.  I was close to purchasing a 1.78 8star, but it was very pricey.  This stone may actually look better if not as good.  Now, I can see the difference in a loose stone between a D and H.  However, I spent 2 hours intiffany's with an appointment.  She loves the tiffany setting, and i almost went with a 2 ct g vs1.  price though was steep.  for what i thought was a well cut stone, but certainly not "super" ideal proportions.   Now, we loked at a 2ct D, and I think it was something like 75grand.  also looked at an I 2 carot that was 27grand.  side by side you could tell a difference, not easily.  one at a time....I was 50%.  worth a 50 grand price difference??   So that is where I learned that if the stone is cut to the extremes of an ideal cut, it can face up very well.  now, on the streets in the diamond district, I could see the difference plain as day between a d and an f, on shitty cut stones...but start asking those guys about pavillion angles/ idealscopes/brilliancescopes etc, and they start to get a confused look on their face.  Ask for an extremely well cut AGS 0, and you have to make an appt to come back when they get their hands on one........
Thanks for all the input...I really like the looks of the 1.81....set in a MM platinum??  I think it could be good.....I'll think about the 2ct though............

Posted:  6/21/2006 10:10:34 PM
P: 6/23/2006 12:32:11 PM
kevinyonker
kevinyonker

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 86
Last Post: 6/28/2006
Member Since: 12/7/2005
 
Several months ago I read an interesting post on how to mathmatically determine the most visually aesthetically pleasing
carat size for different finger sizes.  It's a mathmatical relationship that is consistently found in many beautiful
things.  It's PHI or the Golden Ratio.  The proportion or ratio is 1: 1.618.  

Using this ratio, you find that most prefer larger carat diamonds than the ratio says is perfect.  That being said, beauty
is in the eye of the beholder and to many...bigger is better.

Kevin 

Kevin

Posted:  6/23/2006 12:32:11 PM
P: 6/23/2006 12:59:48 PM
decodelighted
decodelighted

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 8,625
Last Post: 11/16/2009
Member Since: 7/27/2005
 
Date: 6/23/2006 12:32:11 PM
Author: kevinyonker
Several months ago I read an interesting post on how to mathmatically determine the most visually aesthetically pleasing carat size for different finger sizes. It's a mathmatical relationship that is consistently found in many beautiful things. It's PHI or the Golden Ratio. The proportion or ratio is 1: 1.618.


That's so interesting ... how does the formula work, with the numerical "ring size" (probably not, huh). Finger width in MM? DO TELL ... not that I'll ever be able to afford the "desired proportions" for my meat sausages.

Posted:  6/23/2006 12:59:48 PM
P: 6/23/2006 1:11:42 PM
kevinyonker
kevinyonker

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 86
Last Post: 6/28/2006
Member Since: 12/7/2005
 
Here is an example for a size 6 finger

Size 6 = 16.5mm diameter

finger diameter/ finger diameter - diamond diameter

for a size 6 finger, Phi says 6.3mm diamond looks most pleasing

16.5 / 16.5 - 6.3 = 10.2

16.5 / 10.2 = 1.618 

Kevin

Posted:  6/23/2006 1:11:42 PM
P: 6/23/2006 1:21:12 PM
decodelighted
decodelighted

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 8,625
Last Post: 11/16/2009
Member Since: 7/27/2005
 
I gotta find a chart for finger diameter - though I know I won't like what it'll tell me.

ETA: I dunno ... now it seems a little weird to me ... ring size MM is "all the way around the finger" The stone only gets seen comparatively to the width as seen from the top. Hmmmm.

EETA: OOOPS. My bad .. I was confusing diameter with circumfrence.

Posted:  6/23/2006 1:21:12 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Solasfera comparison «» AGS 000 and ImaGem results »
Next Topics
Bought a Cushion. Thanks to James Allen! Help me understand what I'm looking at Part II - 3.57 ct round Ring maintenance - Plat v. 18K white IJO diamonds - set at local dealer Need recommendations on appraisers in NYC area If Mark Morell accepts....how long Proportion question... Guessing ring/finger size? isee2 need analysis..... Slightly irritated with Whiteflash...any advice? Opinion on a 2 CT Steam cleaning (Jewel Jet) sizing question on shared prong eternity ring (I am going nuts!) Diamond Noob - Looking for a 1ct for my GF w/ tiny fingers CHUBB in PA Shenoa? White Gold setting with Pear shaped Diamond Calling All Experts Bigger Stone for Lesser Clarity? Bar set band help Advice Insuring a $5000 ring WITHOUT homeowner's coverage - help? Critique these two diamonds for me? 0.5ct Brilliant Cut Opinions Cushion Cut with Pink Halo? E Ring University Class Ring ?? Question about platinum markings Question : When they cast a wax item.... Brooke Shields' trinity wedding band Help! Urgent appraisal needed in Toronto! My Simon G ring is Here!! Ottofrei Ultrasonic question...please help!!

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives