|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » Is this a good price?
|
|
 |
Is this a good price? |
 |
| P: 4/21/2006 3:56:12 PM | |
sbkim Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 5/3/2006 Member Since: 4/20/2006 |
UPDATED WITH NEW ROCK :) Carat Weight: 2.39 Color Grade: E Clarity Grade: SI1 Proportions: Depth: 60.9 % Table: 53 % Girdle: Thin to Medium, Faceted Culet: None Finish: Polish: Very Good Symmetry: Very Good Fluorescence: None Crown Angle: 33.5° Crown Height: 15.5 % Pavilion Angle: 40.8° Pavilion Depth: 43 % Star length: 55 % Lower Half: 80 % Cut Grade: Excellent |
| Posted: 4/21/2006 3:56:12 PM | |
|
There are 12 replies to this message. There are 12 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 4/21/2006 4:06:05 PM | |
Agent3Civ Cut Rock Total Posts: 126 Last Post: 5/17/2006 Member Since: 3/24/2006 |
pricescoped the diamond, came up with one, a 2.4 ct from James Allen fir $29600
True love is the grandest thing of all. |
| Posted: 4/21/2006 4:06:05 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2006 4:22:40 PM | |
|
sbkim Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 5/3/2006 Member Since: 4/20/2006 |
Well, just heard back that one of the inclusions are visible with naked eye! So much for SI1!! Thanks again for the reply!
|
| Posted: 4/21/2006 4:22:40 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2006 4:36:53 PM | |
stermag Cut Rock Total Posts: 433 Last Post: 4/27/2006 Member Since: 11/26/2005 |
Date: 4/21/2006 4:22:40 PM Author: sbkim Well, just heard back that one of the inclusions are visible with naked eye! So much for SI1!! Thanks again for the reply! SI1 in no way implies that the diamond is eye-clean, so no real shock there. When you dip into SI clarity, it's on a case-by-case basis, I'm afraid. That's not to say it isn't worth the extra effort. SI diamonds present a great value. |
| Posted: 4/21/2006 4:36:53 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2006 4:37:32 PM | |
|
Agent3Civ Cut Rock Total Posts: 126 Last Post: 5/17/2006 Member Since: 3/24/2006 |
well don't think that all SI1's are like that. I just bought an SI1 and it is eye clean. It is a good way of saving some money if you can find an eye clean SI1 or SI2
True love is the grandest thing of all. |
| Posted: 4/21/2006 4:37:32 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2006 7:40:22 PM | |
mrssalvo Ideal Rock Total Posts: 16,859 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 1/3/2005 |
I'd try to stay away from ex. thin-thin girdle combo's, more prone to chipping.
|
| Posted: 4/21/2006 7:40:22 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2006 8:13:58 PM | |
Dancing Fire Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,221 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 4/3/2004 |
sometime i think we expect too much from an SI stone,especially for a stone of this size (2.38ct) i mean come on people, why do you think they call it SI 1 ? there got to be inclusions there.you can't expect .50ct size SI inclusions in a 2.38ct stone. btw; agree with mrsS about the very thin girdle. it is always harder to find a "mind clean" stone than a eye clean stone. |
| Posted: 4/21/2006 8:13:58 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2006 8:16:41 PM | |
Diamonds are Hot! Cut Rock Total Posts: 431 Last Post: 3/10/2007 Member Since: 4/10/2006 |
I would drop in color and bump in clarity if it were me
|
| Posted: 4/21/2006 8:16:41 PM | |
| P: 4/22/2006 1:40:23 AM | |
Ice Grinder Rough Rock Total Posts: 6 Last Post: 4/22/2006 Member Since: 4/22/2006 |
You could get a fancy color for about that price...[$$)] your friends would be envious.
|
| Posted: 4/22/2006 1:40:23 AM | |
| P: 4/22/2006 10:37:48 AM | |
|
sbkim Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 5/3/2006 Member Since: 4/20/2006 |
Well, I think I found an even better deal. Your thoughts PLEASE - What do you think it's worth? I am seeing from 26K and above here... HCA shows excellent. Supposedly no visible inclusions. Carat Weight: 2.39 Color Grade: E Clarity Grade: SI1 Proportions: Depth: 60.9 % Table: 53 % Girdle: Thin to Medium, Faceted Culet: None Finish: Polish: Very Good Symmetry: Very Good Fluorescence: None Crown Angle: 33.5° Crown Height: 15.5 % Pavilion Angle: 40.8° Pavilion Depth: 43 % Star length: 55 % Lower Half: 80 % Cut Grade: Excellent
|
| Posted: 4/22/2006 10:37:48 AM | |
| P: 4/22/2006 8:30:14 PM | |
JulieN Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,145 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 7/25/2005 |
you posted the exact same diamond again. or...you rejected the first stone, it went back to the supplier and was available, and then a second vendor told you it was eye-clean!
|
| Posted: 4/22/2006 8:30:14 PM | |
| P: 4/25/2006 7:51:30 AM | |
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
Date: 4/22/2006 8:30:14 PM JulieN, sbkim just edited his first post with the new stone - not a good idea, too confusing for those who are trying to help.
Author: JulieN you posted the exact same diamond again. or...you rejected the first stone, it went back to the supplier and was available, and then a second vendor told you it was eye-clean! Pricescope |
| Posted: 4/25/2006 7:51:30 AM | |
| P: 4/25/2006 7:54:54 AM | |
|
sbkim Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 5/3/2006 Member Since: 4/20/2006 |
My apologies for the confusion.
|
| Posted: 4/25/2006 7:54:54 AM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
