![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Which stone is more value for money ?? Help ! |
![]() |
| P: 3/17/2006 11:49:46 AM | |
dearris Rough Rock Total Posts: 2 Last Post: 3/17/2006 Member Since: 3/16/2006 |
Hi IG |
| Posted: 3/17/2006 11:49:46 AM | |
![]() |
There are 2 replies to this message. There are 2 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 3/17/2006 11:56:52 AM | |
|
belle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,287 Last Post: 4/3/2008 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
hey dearris welcome to ps!you are certainly getting more diamond for the money with the traditional cut, which is not surprising. you will pay more for a branded cut. did one look better than the other to you?
|
| Posted: 3/17/2006 11:56:52 AM | |
| P: 3/17/2006 12:11:34 PM | |
dearris Rough Rock Total Posts: 2 Last Post: 3/17/2006 Member Since: 3/16/2006 |
If i am compare the bigger brilliant rose which almost the same size as the traditional round cut, the brilliant rose look better.![]() But if i am compare the two stone mention above, maybe due to the size different, they look as good. ![]() But with the fact given above is the traditional round cut a good buy ? Is the cutting good ? As i have burget to look out, i cannot have the best of the both world. As i start to learn that good cutting play a big part to the value of the stone. I do not know what to do ... If i am paying USD1820 for brilliant rose, i think i can only get 0.38c, G color, VS1. Another, the brilliant rose have a nicer setting which make the diamond look bigger that it is from bare eyes. ![]() IG |
| Posted: 3/17/2006 12:11:34 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives