![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
which stone would u get? |
![]() |
| P: 2/25/2006 8:40:34 PM | |
freddy2005 Rough Rock Total Posts: 56 Last Post: 3/10/2006 Member Since: 2/23/2006 |
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=53&item=513505 = smaller carat, better cut, ideal $5280 v. http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=131&item=801982 = bigger carat, premium cut $5590
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 8:40:34 PM | |
![]() |
There are 12 replies to this message. There are 12 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:01:38 PM | |
|
belle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,287 Last Post: 4/3/2008 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
if size is the most important thing to you then you have to go with the bigger one.
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:01:38 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:01:57 PM | |
|
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
yes the size difference would be apparent. Id have him get IS images for both. Have you tried splitting the difference? A well cut 1.0 to 1.10? ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:01:57 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:04:27 PM | |
|
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
need more info but id take something like this over those 2... http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=53&item=633127 need an IS image and the angles off the cert. ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:04:27 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:06:06 PM | |
|
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
another id check out... http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=53&item=633128 ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:06:06 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:07:26 PM | |
|
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
If you wanted to stay higher color, if its eyeclean... http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=53&item=633124 ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:07:26 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:22:37 PM | |
freddy2005 Rough Rock Total Posts: 56 Last Post: 3/10/2006 Member Since: 2/23/2006 |
what is so good about james allen signature series stones? is it much better cut than the premium? how about this one? http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=131&item=739639
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:22:37 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:26:40 PM | |
|
belle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,287 Last Post: 4/3/2008 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
you keep pulling up 60/60 diamonds freddy. if size is your priority, that may be the best option for you but it's generally not going to be the first choice among the cut fanatics around here.
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:26:40 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 9:40:43 PM | |
freddy2005 Rough Rock Total Posts: 56 Last Post: 3/10/2006 Member Since: 2/23/2006 |
i guess what im trying to do is find a good tone with the best bang for the buck here's my priority(well, my gf is more like it), 1. carat, 2. cut, then the rest she's not looking for the best, no the worst..something in the mid range..and my budget is ~ $6k. how about this guys? http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=131&item=796682
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 9:40:43 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 10:02:46 PM | |
|
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
Signature Series are in stock and he can get IS images for you is the biggest advantage. ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 2/25/2006 10:02:46 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 10:04:06 PM | |
|
Gonzodogg Cut Rock Total Posts: 382 Last Post: 9/11/2006 Member Since: 12/1/2005 |
Most people here will tell you that the best bang for the buck comes from an "Ideal" cut SI stone. (The most sparkles and lowest clarity while still being "eye clean") Other than that - color is just a matter of personal preference and budget. You seem to be coming back to "premium" cuts to save money and get a little more size. I personally would not do that - I would pick a slightly smaller stone with a little more POP. just my .02
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 10:04:06 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 10:05:31 PM | |
|
belle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,287 Last Post: 4/3/2008 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
freddy, are you using the ps search tool above? you have a very nice budget and can get a lot of stone with a grrrreaat cut. use the 'cut quality search' all of those stones that come up are in house and have all the information you need to make a sound purchasing decision. after you enter your criteria and search the first time, you can go down to the bottom of the results page and expand your criteria. i would seriously consider lowering your color. if you get a really well cut stone, it will face up as white as any of the colorless stones. you can really put some $$ into size and cut if you go down to the i/j range and you will NOT be dissapointed.
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 10:05:31 PM | |
| P: 2/25/2006 10:43:49 PM | |
ChooChoo Ideal Rock Total Posts: 513 Last Post: 10/15/2006 Member Since: 9/25/2003 |
The G SI1 looks promising. Can you ask James Allen to get you crown/pavillion angles on it? I know a lot of people on the board would disagree, but I wouldn't go as low as a J. H, maybe.
|
| Posted: 2/25/2006 10:43:49 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives