Excel Diamonds
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » Another Ritani Question


  

 Another Ritani Question

P:  11/12/2005 7:04:17 PM  
Kojack
Kojack

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 80
Last Post: 12/21/2005
Member Since: 11/1/2005
 
I have purchased the Ritani Endless Love ring with a .71 princess in a platinum setting. I purchased the single row pave setting.  I know it has a very elegant look to it but I am now thinking I should have went with the 2 row pave band instead of the single one. I have seen many pics of the E-love Ritani rings on pricescope but I havn't seen any with the 2 row pave band. The more I look at all the pics the more the bands look really thin. I know I can purchase the 2 row wedding band down the line and that will solve the problem nicely but the wedding would be a year or 2 away and I am starting to think the band may be too skinny for her liking. Would love some feedback on the single row versus the 2 row bands or a pic of a 2 row band. I may be able to change the order. 

Or....would it be odd to purchase a single row wedding band for her to wear now for thickness and then purchase or upgrade to a double or even triple row pave band for the wedding? Do the bands line up without a noticeable gap?

Thanks for the feedback.
I hate buyers remorse!
Posted:  11/12/2005 7:04:17 PM

 There are 2 replies to this message.  There are 2 replies on this page.

P: 11/12/2005 10:52:36 PM
mrssalvo
mrssalvo

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 16,856
Last Post: 11/20/2009
Member Since: 1/3/2005
 
I personally love the Ritani band. It measure's right around 2mm. When you pair up the wedding band, another 2mm that's 4mm and a nice size across the finger. You can also buy a third wedding band and have her wear one on each side if she'd prefer. Some gals here wear their wedding band on the outside of the e-ring until the wedding and then move it too the inside, just and idea if she'd want extra thinkness without getting a different setting. here's a pic of butterfly 17 Ritani Rings.





-----------------------------
A deal is only a deal if you are getting exactly what you want.

Posted:  11/12/2005 10:52:36 PM
P: 11/12/2005 10:57:54 PM
mrssalvo
mrssalvo

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 16,856
Last Post: 11/20/2009
Member Since: 1/3/2005
 
also, Ritani designs their rings to sit flush with each other so no need to worry about a gap..





-----------------------------
A deal is only a deal if you are getting exactly what you want.

Posted:  11/12/2005 10:57:54 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Need opinions on e-ring setting problems!! «» IGI makes it easier to use HCA »
Next Topics
quarter sizes from whiteflash Questions about the Asscher cut eternity band questions where to buy? AGS certificates Desperately in need of advice and help. Vatche x-prong plain and channel set band Rap price Upgrading my diamond? How does one do this? fine jeweler in Boston area Different types of inclusions help me find a source for a tiffany quality band Which shape diamonds have the best 'spread' to $ value? TMI, Need Help anyone purchased an important diamond from COSTCO? Huge chip If you had $1000, what would you get? Yellow Gold in a Salt Water Pool some metal facts you might not know Best way to clean? which one is better deal??? help.... Advice for dealing with loose setting? (photo attached) setting for round Please Help!!! Which diamond should I choose? Expert Opinion's Appreciated slightly thick to thick girdle Visited Pearlman's today... Which is better and why do you think so? Barcode discrepancy on GIA Report Is GemScan better than IGI? What tools do consumers want? Please help!! Pictures included...

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives