![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Total Depth, should I be concerned |
![]() |
| P: 11/9/2005 12:34:11 AM | |
tinhtu Rough Rock Total Posts: 10 Last Post: 11/15/2005 Member Since: 11/7/2005 |
Is this answer for the question below true? I saw a lot of H&A on WF and GOG stones have the table depths more than 61% and have excellent light return. I am confused and need help. Thanks -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Posted: 11/9/2005 12:34:11 AM | |
![]() |
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 11/9/2005 8:32:15 AM | |
|
aljdewey Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,236 Last Post: 2/11/2008 Member Since: 11/25/2002 |
Date: 11/9/2005 12:34:11 AM Author:tinhtu Is this answer for the question below true? I saw a lot of H&A on WF and GOG stones have the table depths more than 61% and have excellent light return. I am confused and need help. Thanks --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_____________________ |
| Posted: 11/9/2005 8:32:15 AM | |
| P: 11/9/2005 11:14:04 AM | |
|
JohnQuixote Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,212 Last Post: 5/24/2008 Member Since: 9/9/2004 |
I prefer an upper limit of 62.0 for goods larger than melee, but diamonds close to that can still be dynamite, depending on the other parameters. With those combos 62.2 indicates a slightly thick girdle, but could be a very good performer. I did those measurements with single ray trace at 62.2 (1.08 ct) and 60.8 (1.04 ct, thinner girdle). ![]() John |
| Posted: 11/9/2005 11:14:04 AM | |
| P: 11/9/2005 11:14:31 AM | |
|
JohnQuixote Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,212 Last Post: 5/24/2008 Member Since: 9/9/2004 |
60.8 depth![]() John |
| Posted: 11/9/2005 11:14:31 AM | |
| P: 11/10/2005 12:09:31 PM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Date: 11/9/2005 12:34:11 AM Author:tinhtu With a total depth percentage exceeding 61%, the stone becomes a class IV and would only return a maximum of 32%-38% of the light that enters the stone compared to a well proportioned diamond at 88%-91%. These numbers seem total fantasy. It would help to know what the % were taken of, and how these things are modeled etc. By all accounts, depth alone says squat about light return - so this evaluation flies in the face of every cut quality evaluation for round brilliant diamonds starting with Tolkowsky and ending with the latest GIA and AGS cut grading studies. If this guy is right, everyone else on the planet is wrong ![]() OK, I have to admit that the 1% of extra depth add a bit a weight - more if it is due to a wider girdle than other details. However, the difference is easy to observe in diameter size that is apparent on the lab reports and prices are out there to see too. It doesn't seem to matter, really. If you were asking about a 65% deep round, that would deserve some ink, this... well, not quite. Just my 0.2, of course ![]() Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 11/10/2005 12:09:31 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives