Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » Show Me the Ring »  » PLEASE HELP VOTE (Custom E-Ring)

Pages: 1 of 2:    [1]  2  > 

  

 PLEASE HELP VOTE (Custom E-Ring)

P:  9/23/2005 8:15:43 PM  
Sheep
Sheep

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 15
Last Post: 9/28/2005
Member Since: 9/19/2005
 

I have put together two designs for my engagement ring (Yes, I am desiging my own e-ring! How exciting!)
Those two designs shown below are inspired by a ring I saw on the web.   Can anyone pls vote to help me decide?  I really dunno which one I should go with.



The diamond will be in the .65 -.75 range. It will sit closer to the finger for safety and hopefully less abuse.
I believe the final outcome of the ring will look different from my drawing since my images don't show the requisite engineering (I know nothing about jewelry design  )



Thank you for helping!!!!!




#1 - 3 Hearts

concerns: 
Will the 3 prongs hold the stone securely?
Would the hearts block too much light from entering the diamond?
There will be soil build up between the stone and mounting and make it hard to clean.



Posted:  9/23/2005 8:15:43 PM

 There are 45 replies to this message.  There are 30 replies on this page.

P: 9/23/2005 8:16:17 PM
Sheep
Sheep

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 15
Last Post: 9/28/2005
Member Since: 9/19/2005
 
#2 - 2 Hearts
Same concerns as the 3-Hearts design.
 

 

Posted:  9/23/2005 8:16:17 PM
P: 9/23/2005 8:21:20 PM
DeannaBana
DeannaBana

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,081
Last Post: 5/8/2007
Member Since: 6/11/2005
 
Date: 9/23/2005 8:15:43 PM
Author:Sheep

I have put together two designs for my engagement ring (Yes, I am desiging my own e-ring! How exciting!)
Those two designs shown below are inspired by a ring I saw on the web. Can anyone pls vote to help me decide? I really dunno which one I should go with.




The diamond will be in the .65 -.75 range. It will sit closer to the finger for safety and hopefully less abuse.
I believe the final outcome of the ring will look different from my drawing since my images don't show the requisite engineering (I know nothing about jewelry design )




Thank you for helping!!!!!





#1 - 3 Hearts

concerns:
Will the 3 prongs hold the stone securely?
Would the hearts block too much light from entering the diamond?
There will be soil build up between the stone and mounting and make it hard to clean.

Welcome to PS!

I personally like the 2 hearts design a little better...but do choose the design that most appeals to you and good luck!

Deanne Campbell

Posted:  9/23/2005 8:21:20 PM
P: 9/23/2005 8:30:15 PM
jellybean
jellybean

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 624
Last Post: 10/7/2005
Member Since: 2/16/2005
 
I too like the second design better b/c it puts a little more emphasis on the center diamond and not the setting.

The first one reminds me of one Whiteflash has recently done:  http://www.whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Diamond-Settings/Crescendo-Hand-Engraved-Half-Bezel_745.htm

Posted:  9/23/2005 8:30:15 PM
P: 9/23/2005 8:39:18 PM
Sundial
Sundial

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 4,590
Last Post: 7/14/2009
Member Since: 3/14/2005
 
Personally I prefer the way the first design accents the stone and I think it will serve to make the diamond look larger.  Both are lovely!

Posted:  9/23/2005 8:39:18 PM
P: 9/23/2005 8:43:20 PM
Sheep
Sheep

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 15
Last Post: 9/28/2005
Member Since: 9/19/2005
 
Thank you DeannaBana and Jellybean. 

Jellybean - I didn't know Whiteflash has a design like that. Similiar idea. Compared to that, my design looks so simple.

Posted:  9/23/2005 8:43:20 PM
P: 9/23/2005 8:47:32 PM
Virginia
Virginia

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 999
Last Post: 7/14/2006
Member Since: 6/8/2005
 
I love number 2!

Posted:  9/23/2005 8:47:32 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:06:13 PM
Faerievert
Faerievert

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 189
Last Post: 7/25/2006
Member Since: 7/6/2005
 
I prefer the 2 heart. I just think 4 prongs effect looks nicer.

That's MRS. Pittenger, thank you very much!

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:06:13 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:15:15 PM
kelley1975
kelley1975

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 121
Last Post: 10/26/2009
Member Since: 5/18/2005
 
I also like #2...both are pretty, but I think I like the top-down view of #2 the best.  It's so much fun to get to create your own ring!!  Good luck!

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:15:15 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:18:42 PM
cute330xigrl
cute330xigrl

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 428
Last Post: 9/30/2005
Member Since: 8/31/2004
 
#1 is adorable! Really like #1.

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:18:42 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:24:37 PM
Mara
Mara

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 27,919
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 10/30/2002
 
I like the 4 prong aspect of the 2nd but I don't think it finishes out the look of the ring very well...I think the 1st one does that with the 3 hearts forming somewhat of a visual bezel around the whole diamond. The 2nd one just does it on left and right. I like the side profile of the 2nd one better but I really like the head on visual of the 1st better. So if that helps AT ALL (haha!) then that's what I think. I think that 3 prongs could be safe to hold the diamond but consider doing split 'finger' prongs so that you actually have SIX tiny prongs rather than 3...it may add to the visual of the delicate setting also to have the 6 split fingers rather than 3 regular prongs.

I really like the idea! Great designs.

________________________________

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

-Albert Einstein

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:24:37 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:29:51 PM
ame
ame

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 3,452
Last Post: 2/7/2006
Member Since: 7/7/2004
 
#2

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:29:51 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:34:16 PM
bling*diva*
bling*diva*

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 4,026
Last Post: 7/17/2008
Member Since: 6/17/2005
 
~~I vote for design #2 2 hearts... I think it looks a little less "busy" and it showcases the diamond more... good luck!!!

*~~All I see are diamonds...~~*

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:34:16 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:34:35 PM
Kaleigh
Kaleigh

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 25,916
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 11/18/2004
 
I like #2 as well.  One thing I don't love is the butter cup overhang????

____________________________
Piece of cake and a candle.
**ng gift**

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:34:35 PM
P: 9/23/2005 9:38:18 PM
fountainfairfax
fountainfairfax

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,180
Last Post: 7/10/2006
Member Since: 2/4/2005
 
Wow- I'm really impressed with both designs and the work you're showing us here! Where were you when I was trying to visualize the e-ring we're having made right now You could've made a lot of $$ off me!

I really love the profile shot of the 3-heart design, 1st version- it really looks lovely from the side, but from the top the 3 hearts remind me of "illusion rings"- very pretty in their own right but your center stone will be far from small and doesn't need a lot of extra metal showing from the top to trick the eye. 

Guess all my rambling means I'd go with #2

Can't wait to see what you decide!

Posted:  9/23/2005 9:38:18 PM
P: 9/23/2005 10:16:50 PM
EBree
EBree

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 6,653
Last Post: 11/20/2009
Member Since: 8/31/2005
 
#2 gets my vote!

Posted:  9/23/2005 10:16:50 PM
P: 9/23/2005 10:19:09 PM
FireGoddess
FireGoddess

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 12,145
Last Post: 3/23/2009
Member Since: 1/25/2005
 
I'm going to go against the grain here, because I overwhelmingly prefer the first design with the 3 hearts underneath the diamond.  I think it gives a more "finished," uniform look to the setting and frames the center stone so delicately and femininely.   Something about the 2 heart design bothers me - likely because there's swooping metal under 2 sides of the ring only.  Just my opinion, but I vote for #1.






Posted:  9/23/2005 10:19:09 PM
P: 9/23/2005 10:37:48 PM
aljdewey
aljdewey

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 8,236
Last Post: 2/11/2008
Member Since: 11/25/2002
 
I very much prefer the 3-heart design.....very curvy, romantic looking, and really sets off the stone.  The 2-heart version just looks a bit unfinished to me, and the metal sticking out of the sides looks a bit lost.

However, I like the split prongs on your first ring and not the 6 evenly spaced prongs in the bottom right corner of that version.  As Mara said, split prongs in that ring at 2 'clock, 6 oclock, and 10 o'clock would be LOVELY.

Wow - that is just such a PRETTY design.....very thoughtful.  I also like how the prongs in profile curve and shape to hearts, too.  Very nice.

_____________________
Note: Chainsaw Not Sold Separately.

Posted:  9/23/2005 10:37:48 PM
P: 9/23/2005 10:42:44 PM
cnspotts
cnspotts

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 400
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 1/11/2003
 
#1, What a great design, I love it!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When was the last time you had a massage?

Posted:  9/23/2005 10:42:44 PM
P: 9/23/2005 10:43:34 PM
anika
anika

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 122
Last Post: 11/17/2008
Member Since: 5/31/2005
 
Hi there,
I also  like the first design- hearts; it seems more symmetrical in that its around the whole stone vs just to the sides.
Can you make four prongs ie have prongs at 2, 4,8,10 oclock?
Lovely design,

Anika

Posted:  9/23/2005 10:43:34 PM
P: 9/23/2005 10:44:54 PM
Tacori E-ring
Tacori E-ring

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 16,101
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 8/15/2005
 
I like the second setting personally.

Posted:  9/23/2005 10:44:54 PM
P: 9/23/2005 10:55:13 PM
lili
lili

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 2,923
Last Post: 11/21/2009
Member Since: 11/18/2004
 
Sheep,

Both designs are great, but I prefer #1.
I like that it is more symmetrical.
Also, it looks very much like a flower when viewed from the top.

Question.  How would the design look if you make it an open heart instead of a solid heart?
I saw one ring design in the Less Than 1 Carat thread that uses the open heart design for the prong.
Pretty elegant from the side view.

Very creative ideas you have there.

Posted:  9/23/2005 10:55:13 PM
P: 9/23/2005 11:07:18 PM
Rube
Rube

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 323
Last Post: 1/24/2006
Member Since: 4/11/2005
 
I vote #1. I love the bezel look from the top and the three sets of split prongs. It does look more finished (to me), and is a very nice design.

Posted:  9/23/2005 11:07:18 PM
P: 9/23/2005 11:43:32 PM
ecf8503
ecf8503

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,008
Last Post: 11/13/2009
Member Since: 2/14/2005
 
#1 - beautiful!

Posted:  9/23/2005 11:43:32 PM
P: 9/24/2005 2:40:49 AM
Matatora
Matatora

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 8,230
Last Post: 7/26/2006
Member Since: 3/6/2005
 
#2!

-Matatora Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace Most of the change we think we see in life is due to truths being in and out of favor.

Posted:  9/24/2005 2:40:49 AM
P: 9/24/2005 6:58:03 AM
CML
CML

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 167
Last Post: 4/13/2006
Member Since: 8/4/2005
 
#1 option 1 with the cathedral shank.  Beautiful.

Posted:  9/24/2005 6:58:03 AM
P: 9/24/2005 7:39:04 AM
hearts set
hearts set

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 184
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 6/25/2005
 
I'd choose #1.

The three hearts give a look of a flower in bloom and frames the diamond with such curvy shape.

Both are nice...I'm just drawn to the first.

Posted:  9/24/2005 7:39:04 AM
P: 9/24/2005 11:11:52 AM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 
Date: 9/23/2005 8:15:43 PM
Author:Sheep

Just some ideas along your ...

... concerns:

Will the 3 prongs hold the stone securely?

As good as four (meaning one prong bent lets the diamond loose)... less good than 6 (because it takes bending more than one prong to loose the diamond)


Would the hearts block too much light from entering the diamond?

Not a problem, even full bezel settings do not make diamonds 'drab'.


There will be soil build up between the stone and mounting and make it hard to clean.

 Yes.


 I am not sure I understood correctly - do you want girdle set heart shaped diamonds to form the bezel holding the center stone?  That sounds nice, but you may need a wizard to make it and a large diamond in the middle to allow for feasible proportions overall.

Of course, I am not a jeweler, but I would definitely have a talk with one about technical constraints with such a project in mind.



There aren't too many comparable ring designs - which is a good thing, but leaves allot of guesswork too...

J.B. Star makes a ring with the four prongs set with marquise diamonds - it holds one carat diamonds well... and larger ones for sure. However, marquise diamonds seem easier to handle in the setting than heart shapes of comparable size.

And then, well, this is somethins else... the flower buds made of pear shaped diamonds seem to be cousins of your dream ring (or at least of my interpretation of your description).

 

 

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  9/24/2005 11:11:52 AM
P: 9/24/2005 11:22:30 AM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 


The part I do not understand in the design...

... there must be some space for the pavilion of the heart shapes (the larger, the more space) between the elements holding them and the center stone, and this is tricky if the hearts are set in the prongs that hold the center stone and hence have to get onto it not just close. This is less of a problem if the heart shapes are very small relative to the pieces of metal in which they are embedded (think - a large bezel with some relatively tiny heart shapes studded onto it).  The designers of the J.B. Star solitaores went around the problem by using tiny and relatively flat diamonds (marquises) and the makers of that fantastic bracelet not only turned the pears upside down relative to how the hearts would sit next to the center stone in your ring, so that the thin tips allow room for the center stone, but then... the center stone is not held by the same platinum elements that hold the pears - those are briolletess hanging from smewhere between the pear diamonds.

Honestly, I think I would love one of those diamond buds in a pendant... but a ring sounds rather impractical.

The J.B. Star rings looks very beautiful, but I wonder how suitable is that fragile-looking design for every day wear. Also, if the marquises they use in the prongs are so small, they may look glassy and uninteresting in person - depending of what one's expectations about such a ring are.

I hope these lines do not sound discouraging, I bet something can be done and an expereinced jewelry designer may even appreciated the evident challenge.

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  9/24/2005 11:22:30 AM
P: 9/24/2005 11:26:56 AM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 
Speaking of bud-shaped rings...

This can't look bad with a round stone!... or a river pebble, really

  Daniel K at Pearlmans'

 
Of course, the 'petal' elements are paved with diamonds, not made of relatively large ones.


The second concept (two diamond-set elements holding the centre stone) reminds me of this:

 The Ribbon ring by Tiffany

 the pavilion view shows allot better what I mean.



Forgot about the vote... from the pictures you have posted I would rather go with the first - it is a very effective illusion setting that shows off the round shape of the diamond - the other may be more flattering with an oval stone (same observation goes for the Tiffany ring, IMO). Modern 'buttercup' settings are not much to talk about, but this ring seems like a very refined and updated version of this old model - Victorial two-tier flower settings seem related and those worked wonders making even very rough old cut diamonds look bright - really tall order. A modern rond brilliant may not need as much help, but it can't hurt either. 


 

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  9/24/2005 11:26:56 AM
P: 9/24/2005 12:28:04 PM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 
The sort of project just great for reminding a talented jeweler how underused his R&D resources are!  

Thinking of Mark Morell (see mwmjewelry.com) actually.


 

 

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  9/24/2005 12:28:04 PM

 Previous Page Pages: 1 of 2:    [1]  2  >  Next Page 
« Coming out of the closet, and not like R. Kelly «» My reset three prong martini earrings »
Next Topics
Circa 1930s Tiffany's Wedding Set You can kiss my asscher, it's done You can kiss...oh. MY NEW RINGS ARE HERE!!! Anniversary present.....Jabel ring! My Marquise has arrived! Show me your antique engagement ring.... Custom rings & engagement story Ovals please! My sapphire and diamond graduation ring! Please post your rings with shared-prong stones along the band. Custom PC star set eternity wedding band w/ER Unique Rings They're done - the wedding set of AmberGretchen She said Yes and here's why! OMG, Whiteflash Rocks Look, Nan has her hand on my asscher.... plain wedding band or diamond wedding band? D.Vatche Platinum X-Prong Channel Possible wedding band My ring pics from WF!! Cushion Cut with Pave Halo Roppongi's Fabulous 3 Stone Ring! Anyone want to show off their colored diamonds? My WF RING IS HERE!!!! Sneak Preview Pics! Question on Platinum and a matching wedding band? Some of my favorite pieces I'm Getting An Upgrade and My New RHR... I am finally posting pics of my yellow diamond!!! My ring is going back to WF My new cushion e-ring... My WF e-ring (take 2)

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives