projectwedding.com/
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » Four vs. six prongs


  

 Four vs. six prongs

P:  8/3/2005 8:49:11 AM  
VuittonGal
VuittonGal

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 364
Last Post: 9/12/2006
Member Since: 6/22/2005
 
In a 1.75-2 carat RB solitaire, do you think it's necessary to go with six prongs vs. four? Is it all that much safer to put it in six prongs?

 


Posted:  8/3/2005 8:49:11 AM

 There are 5 replies to this message.  There are 5 replies on this page.

P: 8/3/2005 8:59:14 AM
ame
ame

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 3,452
Last Post: 2/7/2006
Member Since: 7/7/2004
 
From what I remember reading on here on that same debate, 6 prongs is ALWAYS the best bet on a round.

I personally think 6 looks better.

Posted:  8/3/2005 8:59:14 AM
P: 8/3/2005 9:39:36 AM
suziQ
suziQ

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,173
Last Post: 10/21/2005
Member Since: 1/17/2005
 
From a lot of what I've read, 6 prong is supposedly more secure.  I've read that you can loose a stone on a 4 prong setting if just one prong is bent or pulled loose, where it would take at least 2 if not 3 prongs to be bent or pulled loose on a 6 prong.  I have stones set in both kinds, though, and both seem pretty secure to me.

Visually, I think it's a matter of preference.  Often I think that a 4 prong setting can make a round stone seem "squarish", and a six prong setting accentuates the roundness of a round stone.  The prongs on a 4 prong also usually look thicker and more substantial, therefore more prominent.  I'm sure that's for security reasons, but I've seen some really cool things done with substantial prongs, like having them fluted and shaped in unusual ways, or even having small surprise diamonds set in the prongs.   A lot of the six prong settings I've seen have thinner more delicate looking prongs that don't stand out as much, showing off the stone a little more since the emphasis isn't drawn as much to the prongs.

Posted:  8/3/2005 9:39:36 AM
P: 8/3/2005 10:18:04 AM
cflutist
cflutist

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,370
Last Post: 7/20/2006
Member Since: 7/12/2004
 
Here is the 4 vs 6 prong thread.

Posted:  8/3/2005 10:18:04 AM
P: 8/3/2005 10:19:19 AM
denverappraiser
denverappraiser

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 4,614
Last Post: 11/22/2009
Member Since: 7/21/2004
 
There have been quite a few discussions about this topic.  Use the search box at the top right corner of the page and look for 4 prong.  As with many threads, the discussion often detours from the title and it helps to just read some that seem promising or that have shown lots of interest.  There's one going on right now about this very topic although you'ld never guess it from the title.

http://www.pricescope.com/idealbb/view.asp?topicID=31880


Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ISA NAJA
Independent Appraisals in Denver

There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile.

Posted:  8/3/2005 10:19:19 AM
P: 8/3/2005 10:40:41 AM
Dancing Fire
Dancing Fire

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 10,224
Last Post: 11/23/2009
Member Since: 4/3/2004
 
Date: 8/3/2005 9:39:36 AM
Author: sjz
From a lot of what I've read, 6 prong is supposedly more secure. I've read that you can loose a stone on a 4 prong setting if just one prong is bent or pulled loose, where it would take at least 2 if not 3 prongs to be bent or pulled loose on a 6 prong. I have stones set in both kinds, though, and both seem pretty secure to me.

Visually, I think it's a matter of preference. Often I think that a 4 prong setting can make a round stone seem 'squarish', and a six prong setting accentuates the roundness of a round stone. The prongs on a 4 prong also usually look thicker and more substantial, therefore more prominent. I'm sure that's for security reasons, but I've seen some really cool things done with substantial prongs, like having them fluted and shaped in unusual ways, or even having small surprise diamonds set in the prongs. A lot of the six prong settings I've seen have thinner more delicate looking prongs that don't stand out as much, showing off the stone a little more since the emphasis isn't drawn as much to the prongs.
i agree,those are the best looking ones.

it is always harder to find a "mind clean" stone than a eye clean stone.

Posted:  8/3/2005 10:40:41 AM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Difference in size of .13 ct «» White Gold turning yellow... »
Next Topics
Help with designing halo help with asscher! What setting? What wedding band? Experiences with local jeweller setting an Internet diamond? What do you all think of this stone? Is this the one? White Gold turning yellow... Will Engagement Ring be Damaged by Wedding Band? (Photo) Guess who else thinks 60/60 is as good as Ideal- GIA!!!! Do not buy from Shenoa and Co teebee and mrssalvo I've got the answer to the peg head question help me figure out my center stone budget..... Help with Emerald cut setting designer Appraisal Questions Could this be the one? Kretchmer 2-stone tension-set & pricing What do you think about this rock? Coast Engagement Rings I finally picked the stone, but I need mounting advice... Should I get this rock? Advice please! How significant are the star facets and lower girdles info? Is this good? Help me choose between some numbers? Bezel settings Appraisal issue Regents, Jubiles and Square H&A's near DC and MD .91 vs. 1.01 size difference,please help!!! Here's my story, sad but true . . . To Ebay or NOT to ebay... that Diamond. Need help finding Verragio-like setting split shank for emerald cut setting? Face Up Size Per Carat w/ Asscher, others ...

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives