![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
what do you think? |
![]() |
| P: 6/15/2005 11:57:09 AM | |
s95 Cut Rock Total Posts: 160 Last Post: 10/23/2005 Member Since: 6/15/2005 |
After lurking obssessively for a month, (thanks to all in this forum for all your good advice and insight), I just purchased a 1.245ct signature round, AGS H, VS2, 6.97X7.00X4.24 depth 60.7% table 56% polish, symmetry ideal culet: pointed Fluoresence Girdle-0.6-1.1 Crown Angle=35 Pavillion Angle=42.8 It scored 0.7 on the HCA tool. It was $7516 which seemed like a great deal. What do you all think? I went through DCD and also am having it set in a 0.5 ctw embedded round diamond engagement band. http://www.dirtcheapdiamonds.com/engagement-detail.cfm?did=60227 I don't think I could have gotten this ring for this price $8600 total retail. I learned through Pricescope, that I don't need to have an E, vvs diamond to get a good beautiful deal. I can hardly wait to see the ring. BTW this is an anniversary upgrade. I have a vs1, e, 0.74 ct round brilliant e-ring currently which I love, but have always wanted something >1ct. I had to do most of the research myself, otherwise I feared for our savings if my husband walked into a B&M looking for a ring. He was going to hit Tiffany's and I was anxious that our son might not be able to go to college if they got ahold of him. ![]() Thanks again for all your help. I'll post pictures once the ring arrives. |
| Posted: 6/15/2005 11:57:09 AM | |
![]() |
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 6/15/2005 12:13:14 PM | |
|
Paul-Antwerp Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,911 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 9/3/2002 |
I think that you have made an error in noting the pavilion angle. Unless this is the pavilion depth, of course. Live long, Paul Slegers |
| Posted: 6/15/2005 12:13:14 PM | |
| P: 6/15/2005 1:10:47 PM | |
s95 Cut Rock Total Posts: 160 Last Post: 10/23/2005 Member Since: 6/15/2005 |
Oops! Pavillion angle is 40.6 and Fluoresence = none. Thanks! Those numbers still confuse me.
|
| Posted: 6/15/2005 1:10:47 PM | |
| P: 6/15/2005 1:13:56 PM | |
|
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,919 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
That's better!! Sounds like you did get a good deal. Congratulations, can't wait to see it.
____________________________ |
| Posted: 6/15/2005 1:13:56 PM | |
| P: 6/15/2005 3:55:25 PM | |
|
Angel7 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,997 Last Post: 8/7/2008 Member Since: 1/18/2005 |
Sorry I'm not educated enough to comment on the diamond but I just wanted to say the band looks great. Very unique. I love it!
____________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Posted: 6/15/2005 3:55:25 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives