|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » 2 Rocks: Help Me Decide!!!
|
|
 |
2 Rocks: Help Me Decide!!! |
 |
| P: 5/19/2005 9:30:37 PM | |
joelovesfishin Rough Rock Total Posts: 2 Last Post: 5/20/2005 Member Since: 5/19/2005 |
1.067 G/VS2 6.64-6.65 x 4.04 mm Depth: 60.7 Table: 54% Girdle: 0.8-1.4 Crown Angle: 34.600 Pavilion Angle: 40.700 Polish: Ideal Symmetry: Ideal Fluorescence: N Here's the Photo's: Diamond 1 1.083 G/VS2 6.57-6.59 x 4.09 mm Depth: 62.2% Table: 55% Girdle: 0.8-2.3 Crown Angle: 34.600 Pavilion Angle: 40.800 Polish: Ideal Symmetry: Ideal Fluorescence: N Here's the Photo's: Diamond 2 Thanks for any help!!! |
| Posted: 5/19/2005 9:30:37 PM | |
|
There are 5 replies to this message. There are 5 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 5/19/2005 9:39:13 PM | |
|
Maxine Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,394 Last Post: 10/25/2009 Member Since: 12/6/2004 |
I like the first one....it has less carat weight, but it actually has a larger diameter (because it is not as deep as the second one)..... Just my unprofessional opinion, of course!! 
|
| Posted: 5/19/2005 9:39:13 PM | |
| P: 5/19/2005 10:16:38 PM | |
JohnQuixote Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,212 Last Post: 5/24/2008 Member Since: 9/9/2004 |
Nice selections. The depth of #2 is a bit out of my own tight tolerance boundries, but both diamonds will be dynamic performers looking at the ideal-scopes. #1 will have a fluid and colorful character to its scintillation while #2 will be a bit more snappy. The table on #1 will also amplify the DCLR (chromatic flares/prismatic color). If you are hair-splitting the level of H&A exactness, #1 has more precise patterning - but that won't make any visible difference in the two. For me, sight-unseen, #1 wins by a nose. John |
| Posted: 5/19/2005 10:16:38 PM | |
| P: 5/19/2005 10:32:40 PM | |
Dancing Fire Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,227 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 4/3/2004 |
this is easy,i'll take #1.... not as deep,the harts are more precise.
it is always harder to find a "mind clean" stone than a eye clean stone. |
| Posted: 5/19/2005 10:32:40 PM | |
| P: 5/20/2005 11:01:01 AM | |
|
joelovesfishin Rough Rock Total Posts: 2 Last Post: 5/20/2005 Member Since: 5/19/2005 |
Thanks for your help...Diamond 1 was what I was thinking, I wanted to make sure there wasn't something you experts might have seen...Once again THANKS!! Joe
|
| Posted: 5/20/2005 11:01:01 AM | |
| P: 5/20/2005 11:11:51 AM | |
fire&ice Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,827 Last Post: 3/30/2009 Member Since: 7/22/2002 |
Number 1 - assuming the prices are in the same range.
|
| Posted: 5/20/2005 11:11:51 AM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
