|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » Emerald diamond table
|
|
 |
Emerald diamond table |
 |
| P: 5/2/2005 9:44:53 PM | |
abbott Cut Rock Total Posts: 173 Last Post: 4/25/2006 Member Since: 10/22/2002 |
What do you think of emerald diamond with the following stats: M: 9.02 x 7.37 x 4.58 depth 62.1 table 71 gridle vt-thin cutlet none polish vg sym g clarity vs1 color F What do you think of the table... and what would you pay for such a diamond??? Thanks!!! ABBOTT
|
| Posted: 5/2/2005 9:44:53 PM | |
|
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 5/2/2005 9:58:05 PM | |
AChiOAlumna Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,678 Last Post: 2/24/2007 Member Since: 3/11/2005 |
Hey abbott! First...how many carats is this?? Second...the depth is great but the table is a little too large...may look glassy, but with fancy cuts (especially ECs) you really have to look at it yourself! Third...the "VThin" girdle concerns me...greater risk of chipping... Price?? Wouldn't know where to begin with this one...sorry 
|
| Posted: 5/2/2005 9:58:05 PM | |
| P: 5/2/2005 10:12:14 PM | |
|
abbott Cut Rock Total Posts: 173 Last Post: 4/25/2006 Member Since: 10/22/2002 |
I was concerned about the table and the girdle. The size of the diamond is 2.63c... What about the length width ratio??? Thanks again... ABBOTT |
| Posted: 5/2/2005 10:12:14 PM | |
| P: 5/2/2005 10:18:26 PM | |
|
AChiOAlumna Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,678 Last Post: 2/24/2007 Member Since: 3/11/2005 |
Then length to width ratio is 1.22:1. This is strictly a preference thing. I prefer a 1.4 to 1.5 ratio, making it a little more rectangular. The 1.22 ratio is more square. There's nothing wrong with this...it's just not my taste...
|
| Posted: 5/2/2005 10:18:26 PM | |
| P: 5/3/2005 12:32:45 AM | |
windowshopper Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,023 Last Post: 7/25/2006 Member Since: 7/11/2004 |
Date: 5/2/2005 9:44:53 PM welllllll....i think you might have a very nice looking diamond here. yes the table is a bit large but the flip side is that the diamond looks a lot bigger. my table is 59 and people often guess the stone to be much smaller than it is. likewsie a vthing girdle is somehwat more risky but not tremendously so....if its set well and insured its a benefit..........you have less carat weight in the girdle. lastly 1.22 is the most popular shape right now--its like a matchbox. a squarish rectangle. i prefer thinner but its a very nice shape. the depth is ideal
Author:abbott What do you think of emerald diamond with the following stats: M: 9.02 x 7.37 x 4.58 depth 62.1 table 71 gridle vt-thin cutlet none polish vg sym g clarity vs1 color F What do you think of the table... and what would you pay for such a diamond??? Thanks!!! ABBOTT
|
| Posted: 5/3/2005 12:32:45 AM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
