|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » Please Tell me wich one you like more!!
|
|
 |
Please Tell me wich one you like more!! |
 |
| P: 4/21/2005 10:41:36 PM | |
nu Rough Rock Total Posts: 60 Last Post: 8/9/2005 Member Since: 12/5/2004 |
#1
|
| Posted: 4/21/2005 10:41:36 PM | |
|
There are 12 replies to this message. There are 12 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 4/21/2005 10:42:26 PM | |
|
nu Rough Rock Total Posts: 60 Last Post: 8/9/2005 Member Since: 12/5/2004 |
#2
|
| Posted: 4/21/2005 10:42:26 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2005 10:52:30 PM | |
Maxine Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,394 Last Post: 10/25/2009 Member Since: 12/6/2004 |
Both look very nice!! What size are they?
|
| Posted: 4/21/2005 10:52:30 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2005 10:53:07 PM | |
|
nu Rough Rock Total Posts: 60 Last Post: 8/9/2005 Member Since: 12/5/2004 |
#1 1.0 RB F VS2 Depth:60 Table:55 Crown Angle:34.7 Crown %:15.3 Pavilion Angle:40.6 Pavilion %:42.7 Girdle: thin Polish:ideal Symmetry:ideal Culet:pointed Fluorescence:Negligible Measurements: 6.51-6.53X3.91 #2 1.08ct RB G VS2 Depth:60.2 Table:55 Crown Angle:34.8 Crown %:15.4 Pavilion Angle:40.5 Pavilion %:42.6 Girdle:Thin Faceted Polish:Ideal Symmetry:Ideal Culet:Pointed Fluorescence:Negligible Measurements: 6.68-6.70X4.03
|
| Posted: 4/21/2005 10:53:07 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2005 11:02:32 PM | |
|
Maxine Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,394 Last Post: 10/25/2009 Member Since: 12/6/2004 |
They both look like they would be very brilliant stones.....have you seen them????? If so, it all depends on how they look to you....if you haven't seen them in person, you could talk to the vendor about them.....it's a tough call!!
|
| Posted: 4/21/2005 11:02:32 PM | |
| P: 4/21/2005 11:57:48 PM | |
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
Cant go wrong with either one. ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 4/21/2005 11:57:48 PM | |
| P: 4/22/2005 1:55:21 AM | |
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Sure the diameter numbers for the G are right ? It is a bit larger than expected for a 1 carat round ... The Ideal Scope piuctures are straight "by the book" - so if any difference between the two remains, it should be slight and not a matter of "quality" but taste. Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 4/22/2005 1:55:21 AM | |
| P: 4/22/2005 2:13:15 AM | |
Dancing Fire Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,227 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 4/3/2004 |
Date: 4/22/2005 1:55:21 AM Ana,the G is a 1.08ct.
Author: valeria101 Sure the diameter numbers for the G are right ? It is a bit larger than expected for a 1 carat round ... it is always harder to find a "mind clean" stone than a eye clean stone. |
| Posted: 4/22/2005 2:13:15 AM | |
| P: 4/22/2005 7:35:05 AM | |
|
nu Rough Rock Total Posts: 60 Last Post: 8/9/2005 Member Since: 12/5/2004 |
I have not seen both stones. I can have them both send to me though. What do you guys think about this one? F SI1 eyeclean Depth:60.6 Table:55 Crown Angle:34.7 Crown %:15.5 Pavilion Angle:40.8 Pavilion %:43 Girdle:Thin Faceted Polish:Ideal Symmetry:Ideal Culet:Pointed Fluorescence:Negligible Measurements: 6.94-6.97X4.22 
|
| Posted: 4/22/2005 7:35:05 AM | |
| P: 4/22/2005 10:20:51 AM | |
fire&ice Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,827 Last Post: 3/30/2009 Member Since: 7/22/2002 |
What is the size of the last one you listed? Also, what are the prices?
|
| Posted: 4/22/2005 10:20:51 AM | |
| P: 4/22/2005 7:33:08 PM | |
|
nu Rough Rock Total Posts: 60 Last Post: 8/9/2005 Member Since: 12/5/2004 |
The last one is 1.20 ct The prices for #2 and #3 are almost the same.
|
| Posted: 4/22/2005 7:33:08 PM | |
| P: 4/22/2005 8:41:51 PM | |
MaybeYesterday Cut Rock Total Posts: 199 Last Post: 7/26/2005 Member Since: 6/30/2004 |
Date: 4/21/2005 10:42:26 PM Author: nu #2 I like the idealscope for #2. It looks like there would be a little more fire, scintillation and contrast. The black pinpoints between the arrows are something to look for. At least this what I've deduced from my research. Deeper reds also indicate strong brillance. I don't know if you've read this or not, but it helped me learn a little more: (I hope.) Good Old Gold's Idealscope/Firescope Tutorial Also: #2 Scores a Whopping: Total Visual Performance 0.3 - Excellent within TIC range on the HCA. (If I'm not mistaken.) #1 is no stinker either, it scores 0.6 - Excellent within TIC range - I think this one would be bright, but a little lacking in fire and scintillation.
|
| Posted: 4/22/2005 8:41:51 PM | |
| P: 4/24/2005 12:49:02 PM | |
|
nu Rough Rock Total Posts: 60 Last Post: 8/9/2005 Member Since: 12/5/2004 |
thanks for the article. Unfortunately those black dots between arrows are so rare, especially like those in that article.
|
| Posted: 4/24/2005 12:49:02 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
