JamesAllen.com
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » Asscher and it's depth...3 stones


  

 Asscher and it's depth...3 stones

P:  4/11/2005 1:50:38 PM  
jabryant76
jabryant76

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 18
Last Post: 7/1/2006
Member Since: 11/1/2004
 

Is this diamonds depth too large for it's size?  Doesn't seem that way to me, but I was told it was by an online vendor.   Here is the exact quote "my gemologist said that it is too deep- you don't want the weight to be carried in the depth, that would make your stone look smaller."   I know it's hard to determine an asschers quality just based upon the certificate.



Report: GIA
Shape: Asscher
Carat: 0.80
Color: H
Clarity: IF
Depth: 66.2
Table: 57
Girdle: THN-M
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Culet: None
Fluorescence: Faint
Measurements: 5.35-5.33X3.53
Length/Width: 1.00



I'm just curious cause they did not mention any depth issue for the following 2 stones I mentioned to them.  All 3 of these stones seem very similiar and well cut to me on paper.  But they keep pointing me towards already stocked diamonds.



Report: GIA
Shape: Asscher
Carat: 0.82
Color: H
Clarity: VS1
Depth: 67.2
Table: 58
Girdle: STK
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Very Good
Culet: None
Fluorescence: Medium Blue
Measurements: 5.32-5.31X3.57
Length/Width: 1.00



Report: GIA
Shape: Asscher
Carat: 0.84
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
Depth: 67.1
Table: 57
Girdle: MD-TK
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Culet: None
Fluorescence: No
Measurements: 5.32-5.32X3.57
Length/Width: 1.00



Thanks in advance,
John


Posted:  4/11/2005 1:50:38 PM

 There are 10 replies to this message.  There are 10 replies on this page.

P: 4/11/2005 1:52:36 PM
Mara
Mara

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 27,901
Last Post: 11/22/2009
Member Since: 10/30/2002
 
hmmm I may be going out on a limb here with this guess, but is this online vendor who told you it was too deep...could it possibly be Fred Cuellar's site, Diamond Cutters International (DCI)?? 

To my somewhat unpracticed Asscher eye, that first one is not 'too' deep...I have seen worse!

________________________________

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

-Albert Einstein

Posted:  4/11/2005 1:52:36 PM
P: 4/11/2005 2:33:21 PM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 
Well... so what is the right depth ?   And why is it better ? 

It would be nice to know how effective are the proportions of those three (brilliance and looks and shape) but the cert does not say that. Most square Ecs would likely be cut deeper - so these are not "deep".  

By definition, the Asscher style is a deep cut stone - those are surely not "deep" and not quite "Asscher" - just three modern square emeralds with desirable proportions (as much as it shows on the cert) for what they are.

Of course any seller would push existing stock first - they have already spent cash on those stones and need to sell them

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  4/11/2005 2:33:21 PM
P: 4/11/2005 2:37:33 PM
jabryant76
jabryant76

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 18
Last Post: 7/1/2006
Member Since: 11/1/2004
 
No it was not DCI.  Which though does bring me to another question, when you do a search on pricescope for diamonds.  In some instances I have seen the same exact diamond returned for up to 4 vendors.  So does a wholesaler have most of the diamonds you see on the search for pricescope, and the online vendors are the middleman?  Just trying to understand the business itself.  I asked my contact about this, and the subject was quickly changed.  And what trouble is it for them to actually provide a picture of the diamond, a sarin report and a ideal scope of these diamonds? 

Posted:  4/11/2005 2:37:33 PM
P: 4/11/2005 2:37:44 PM
diamondsbylauren
diamondsbylauren

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,128
Last Post: 1/5/2006
Member Since: 10/18/2003
 
I agree with Ana.
Anything under 70% is NOT a deep Asscher.
I also agree that sometimes sellers give out information for the sole purpose of selling what they own- regardless if the statement is true or not.

David

Posted:  4/11/2005 2:37:44 PM
P: 4/11/2005 2:40:33 PM
Hest88
Hest88

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 3,677
Last Post: 11/21/2009
Member Since: 1/22/2003
 
Absolutely NOT too deep if you're aiming for an asscher look.

As for your 2nd questions, this is from the FAQs:
http://www.pricescope.com/idealbb/view.asp?topicID=11423

Posted:  4/11/2005 2:40:33 PM
P: 4/11/2005 3:11:44 PM
QueenMum
QueenMum

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,971
Last Post: 10/28/2009
Member Since: 2/13/2003
 
This Asscher (Whiteflash Expert Selection) looks like a beauty.




It's depth is 72.4%.
So...


Stephan

Posted:  4/11/2005 3:11:44 PM
P: 4/11/2005 6:48:36 PM
fatafelice
fatafelice

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,746
Last Post: 11/21/2009
Member Since: 7/27/2004
 
Is it just me, or is the depth on the other two (not in-house) stones actually deeper?  Hmmmmmm.....

Posted:  4/11/2005 6:48:36 PM
P: 4/11/2005 8:51:21 PM
strmrdr
strmrdr

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 23,296
Last Post: 10/9/2009
Member Since: 11/1/2003
 
65%-70% is generaly the sweet spot for good looking ascchers with a few exceptions.
The ones you posted look like a good starting point but the numbers only tell 20% of the story.
You need good photos or see them in person to really get an idea if they are worth buying or not.

........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K

Posted:  4/11/2005 8:51:21 PM
P: 4/11/2005 8:52:38 PM
strmrdr
strmrdr

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 23,296
Last Post: 10/9/2009
Member Since: 11/1/2003
 
check this thread for more info:

http://www.pricescope.com/idealbb/view.asp?topicID=24689

........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K

Posted:  4/11/2005 8:52:38 PM
P: 4/11/2005 8:59:26 PM
strmrdr
strmrdr

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 23,296
Last Post: 10/9/2009
Member Since: 11/1/2003
 
Here is an example of a bit shallower one that is one of the exceptions:
http://www.goodoldgold.com/0_92ct_e_vs1_asscher.htm

this one is closer to classic asscher demensions.

http://www.goodoldgold.com/0_72ct_d_vs2_asscher.htm

........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K

Posted:  4/11/2005 8:59:26 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Does adding Rhodium plating change ring size? «» So confused about Ering purchase »
Next Topics
newbie questions about shopping Opinion on a princess cut diamond Blue Nile vs Other Vendors Need a good appraiser in Wisconsin/Illinois. Please help Expert question for gemologists?? Radiant Cut...Do the numbers Look OK? What about this cushion? Do you trust your eyes? Romancing the Stone, Inc. AKA RTS Inc. So confused about Ering purchase Feedback on radiant cut diamond... please Urgent help needed! Just bought 1.22ct K SI1 - not eyeclean to me Bargaining at Bailey Banks & Biddle??? old european cuts, sarin reports and numbers! Your opinion please? Round, 1c...yada yada yada Eye clean: what can be inferred by the plot, if anything? How about this cushion? Opinion on F colored diamond with very strong blue florescence Date on GIA Cert online resources- antique/deco settings? (replica ok) Cross Cathedral Solitaire by Niceice? good price for this stone? help please Cushion Modified Brilliant opinions? final picks..help? Star facets percent info ...... EGL rounding on certificates Fun visit to Whiteflash! sarin done locally? Mixing shapes? Date on GemEx report dated after the day that I recieved the diamond!!! engagement-ring-mountings.com? What would you do? Opinions on a Princess Purchase w/ Pics

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives