|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » Show Me the Ring
»  » Custom ring finished -- kind of bummed
|
| Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
|
 |
Custom ring finished -- kind of bummed |
 |
| P: 4/8/2005 9:27:04 PM | |
dutchgirl Rough Rock Total Posts: 53 Last Post: 5/31/2006 Member Since: 2/21/2005 |
Hi- My fiance and I finally went ahead and purchased a custom ring from WF. They did an incredible job - great workmanship...but we went with a smaller center (0.50) and two side diamonds (.26 approx) and I'm unhappy with the scale of the two sides in comparison to the center. They seem too large (I prefer smaller) and I'm kind of bummed about the whole thing. I wrote WF and they said they could go down in size but it wouldn't make much of a difference to the eye. I'm hoping they're wrong. Here's a pic...let me know what you think. Please note that the diamonds going down the band look HUGE in the picture -- they're actually MUCH smaller and more proportioned in person (which is what we wanted). So don't let that throw you off. Should we go ahead and increase the size of the center a bit and decrease the sides a bit to show off the center more? Anyone have this problem? It just seems (in person) that they all run together and I prefer to show off the center. I would try to post a hand pic but my digital pics don't come out at all. I'm just a little sad because this this is basically a copy of a Ritani that I tried on and loved but I admit the sides were much smaller in comparison to the Ritani's center. Any suggestions or words of encouragement? 
|
| Posted: 4/8/2005 9:27:04 PM | |
|
There are 53 replies to this message. There are 30 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 4/8/2005 9:33:39 PM | |
AmberGretchen Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,046 Last Post: 11/11/2009 Member Since: 1/6/2005 |
Hi - I have to say that I think that is a gorgeous ring! However, if you are not happy with it, I would try to adjust the sizes of the sides and center as you are able to within your budget. I would suggest wearing it for a little while just to see if it grows on you a bit though.
|
| Posted: 4/8/2005 9:33:39 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 9:40:23 PM | |
|
dutchgirl Rough Rock Total Posts: 53 Last Post: 5/31/2006 Member Since: 2/21/2005 |
Thank you, Ambergretchen! I have been wearing it everywhere, looking at it in every possible light, hoping it will grow on me. It IS a very pretty ring, and the diamonds sparkle like crazy, but I need to be WOWED by it if I have to live with it on my hand for the rest of my life!!! Only wish I could take pics of it...anyone know how to take good pics with a Canon S30?
|
| Posted: 4/8/2005 9:40:23 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 9:46:59 PM | |
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,896 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
I have to say that it is a gorgeous ring, although you are the judge as to whether you will be happy with it in the long run. I'm sure that WF will be happy to adjust the sidestones to a smaller weight. Why not wear it for a bit to see what you think?? Good luck and let us know what you decide!!
____________________________ |
| Posted: 4/8/2005 9:46:59 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 9:53:01 PM | |
Buena Girl Ideal Rock Total Posts: 982 Last Post: 5/18/2006 Member Since: 2/25/2004 |
Your ring is gorgeous!!! But, I agree that the center diamond might not be commanding as much attention as you want it to. Would your budget allow you to get a large enough stone for the visual effect that you want? Or, you could always wear it as it is now, and upgrade the center diamond later. *~~~*~~~*~~~*~~~* "It's all buena" |
| Posted: 4/8/2005 9:53:01 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 10:00:20 PM | |
|
dutchgirl Rough Rock Total Posts: 53 Last Post: 5/31/2006 Member Since: 2/21/2005 |
From what WF told me, I can go bigger in the center but not TOO much, otherwise they would need to re-create a whole new ring.  If I took the center up to .65 and the sides down to .19 it might work?
|
| Posted: 4/8/2005 10:00:20 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 10:12:30 PM | |
Lynn B Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,142 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 5/9/2004 |
Date: 4/8/2005 10 Yes, personally, I think that would DEFINITELY give you a huge visual difference. You'd be gaining 15 points in the center stone, and decreasing the sides by 7 points each. Math is certainly not my forte, so I'm not exactly sure of the percentages  0:20 PMAuthor: dutchgirl From what WF told me, I can go bigger in the center but not TOO much, otherwise they would need to re-create a whole new ring. If I took the center up to .65 and the sides down to .19 it might work? but currently your sides are a little over HALF the size of your center. With the .65/.19 the center stone would be well over 3 times the size of the sides. I think that would give you the look you have envisioned. But I also have to say, I think the ring is GORGEOUS just the way it is. But you should be 200% happy -- and if that means a re-work, then I don't think you will never regret it. Also, since I am a girl who never turns up her nose at larger stones, I think a .65 center diamond is a great idea!  And one last thing... regarding photos. I have a cheapie little digital Kodak Easy-Share camera with no macro mode. I have taken some good photos by taping a magnifying glass or loupe to the front of the camera over the lens. Hey now -- quit laughing... it works!  Lynn Lynn And THAT'S my story and I'm sticking to it! |
| Posted: 4/8/2005 10:12:30 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 10:23:20 PM | |
|
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,896 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
I agree with going to a larger stone of .65 and going with sidestones that are. 19 tw. This way your center stone will really pop. It is amazing just the way it is but you have to be totally happy with it. That said, let us know what you decide and good luck!! 
____________________________ |
| Posted: 4/8/2005 10:23:20 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 11:08:02 PM | |
aljdewey Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,236 Last Post: 2/11/2008 Member Since: 11/25/2002 |
I have to say I agree as well - go up on the center (as much as you can), and down on the sides. I, too, wanted to showcase my center stone. I didn't want my ring to look like a typical 3-stone.....I wanted it to still look "engagement-like". I put two 30-pt. stones (4.4mm) on either side of my 1.25 center (7 mm)......and honestly, I could have even gone a bit smaller....down to .25 each. _____________________ |
| Posted: 4/8/2005 11:08:02 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 11:08:27 PM | |
|
dutchgirl Rough Rock Total Posts: 53 Last Post: 5/31/2006 Member Since: 2/21/2005 |
Here is what WF wrote me: "The difference in actual size of the center diamond from .50 to .65 would be 0.40mm. The difference in actual size of the side diamonds down to .20 would be 0.30mm. That is a very small difference...almost not perceivable. If you make a bigger change in the three diamonds, the ring would have to be totally rebuilt." Apparently they don't have any 'supercut' .20 diamonds but they do have some .22 diamonds that are supercut. I really would like to go for a bigger center, smaller sides but if WF is telling me it won't make a difference...I don't see how that can be. 
|
| Posted: 4/8/2005 11:08:27 PM | |
| P: 4/8/2005 11:23:35 PM | |
|
aljdewey Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,236 Last Post: 2/11/2008 Member Since: 11/25/2002 |
Date: 4/8/2005 11 8:27 PMAuthor: dutchgirl Here is what WF wrote me: 'The difference in actual size of the center diamond from .50 to .65 would be 0.40mm. The difference in actual size of the side diamonds down to .20 would be 0.30mm. That is a very small difference...almost not perceivable. If you make a bigger change in the three diamonds, the ring would have to be totally rebuilt.' Apparently they don't have any 'supercut' .20 diamonds but they do have some .22 diamonds that are supercut. I really would like to go for a bigger center, smaller sides but if WF is telling me it won't make a difference...I don't see how that can be. I see. Well, if that's all you can do by way of adjustment, it may not make much of a difference. _____________________ |
| Posted: 4/8/2005 11:23:35 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 12:35:40 AM | |
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
In all honesty, I like it allot as is. Just in case... the picture below might give an idea what the rearranging of stone sizes would do  I am sure WF can make the precise version - this is a quick fix.  Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 4/9/2005 12:35:40 AM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 12:57:23 AM | |
Daniela Ideal Rock Total Posts: 703 Last Post: 8/16/2006 Member Since: 10/2/2003 |
Hmm, I really like Val's mock-up. Look, the change in proportions might be subtle, but beauty is a subtle thing! So don't let them tell you it won't be noticeable. I, too, would prefer the larger centre and slightly smaller sides. But it's a gorgeous ring as it is now; it's just a different look. At any rate, congratulations! 
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 12:57:23 AM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 9:18:59 AM | |
bluedawg Cut Rock Total Posts: 485 Last Post: 6/25/2005 Member Since: 3/7/2005 |
The setting and ring are beautiful. I think the Photoshop work by Valeria shows that the center stone does stand out much more with the increase in center and decrease in sidestones. I'd do it if you want those proportions. GL! I'm sorry you're not thrilled with the ring. My opinion is that you won't "grow to love it" if it bothers you now.
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 9:18:59 AM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 9:26:40 AM | |
IHeartWF Cut Rock Total Posts: 106 Last Post: 8/1/2005 Member Since: 3/23/2005 |
I love the ring as is, as well...it's absolulty beautiful! |
| Posted: 4/9/2005 9:26:40 AM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 9:55:45 AM | |
NyssaLynne Cut Rock Total Posts: 353 Last Post: 7/3/2005 Member Since: 12/21/2004 |
I think the larger center in the mock-up DOES make a difference but I would still like to see smaller sides. The difference in the sides is barely noticeable.
Lynne~ |
| Posted: 4/9/2005 9:55:45 AM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 10:00:22 AM | |
|
dutchgirl Rough Rock Total Posts: 53 Last Post: 5/31/2006 Member Since: 2/21/2005 |
Valeria!!!! That's exactly what I'm looking to do. I probably should of done it from day one, but you can never really be certain what it will look like on the actual ring until it's finished (at least I can't!) Thanks so much for the mock-up, I'm definitely going to increase center, decrease sides as much as possible to attain that look. I love this forum!
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 10:00:22 AM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 12:09:09 PM | |
FireGoddess Ideal Rock Total Posts: 12,145 Last Post: 3/23/2009 Member Since: 1/25/2005 |
I also agree ana's mockup shows that it does make a little difference in scaling up the center stone and down the side stones...but it is noticeable. Not so much noticeable from the side, but definitely from the top. I'm glad you're swapping stones out...it is true that you need to adore your ring or it will bug you forever!! Ana...you have mad skills man...mad skills. I tried to photoshop a picture once, to see how my ring reset would look...hideous. My pear didn't even look like a pear by the time I was done. Oops. 
 |
| Posted: 4/9/2005 12:09:09 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 1:35:07 PM | |
Matatora Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,230 Last Post: 7/26/2006 Member Since: 3/6/2005 |
I liek your ring I think it is pretty....but what about nixing the side stones all together? That would definately make you center stone pop! How long will all of this take? What does your wedding band look like. Good Luck and I cant wait for more shiny pictures.
-Matatora Courage is the price that life extracts for granting peace Most of the change we think we see in life is due to truths being in and out of favor. |
| Posted: 4/9/2005 1:35:07 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 1:48:45 PM | |
Kaili Ideal Rock Total Posts: 752 Last Post: 7/17/2006 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
I too LOVE your ring, but I do think that there is a difference in the look based on the mock-up. I think I would go up with the center stone and down with the sides.
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 1:48:45 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 3:31:19 PM | |
lop Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,651 Last Post: 9/7/2009 Member Since: 6/14/2003 |
The differences may not be big, but the portions change dramatically IMO. I really like Ana's mock up, and don't necessarily think the side stones are too small, Much smaller, and I'd just stick with a center and the stones in the band, skipping the side stones all together.
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 3:31:19 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 3:46:45 PM | |
Maxine Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,394 Last Post: 10/25/2009 Member Since: 12/6/2004 |
Is Ana's mock-up possible given the current setting???? It looks very nice...because that IS a very graceful, flowing 3 stone setting in general......
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 3:46:45 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 6:34:18 PM | |
Mara Ideal Rock Total Posts: 27,901 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 10/30/2002 |
I agree that it looks a bit of of proportion for my tastes as well, sometimes you won't know that until you see it in person in the end and on your hand. I think Ana's right modification looks great, but I would almost decrease those sides a bit more..aka enlarge the center maybe to a .60c and decrease the sides to .15c's? Can you swing this? To me the center stone really should pop in a 3 stone, aka with my old 1.29c stone I thought .38c's would look great to make it a 3 stone, but some people do like that 50% look...anyway..good luck, the design of the ring itself looks VERY beautiful, I love the side views, so good luck and I am sure WF will work with you to ensure you are happy!! ________________________________ |
| Posted: 4/9/2005 6:34:18 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 7:16:01 PM | |
|
elepri Ideal Rock Total Posts: 759 Last Post: 5/6/2006 Member Since: 6/29/2004 |
I think the ring is gorgeous, love the side view! I agree, it looks more like an anniversary ring but with the proportions like in the second picture Valeria did i think it would be perfect for an engagement ring.
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 7:16:01 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 7:27:43 PM | |
mrsfrk Ideal Rock Total Posts: 648 Last Post: 10/17/2006 Member Since: 4/20/2004 |
Gosh, I love everything about that ring! The design is just magnificent. I am personally a big fan of the side stones being 50% of the center stone look, but this is YOUR ring, if it doesn't speak to you right now, it's not going to. Be sure to keep us posted and post pics of the modified version!
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 7:27:43 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 7:40:35 PM | |
belle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,287 Last Post: 4/3/2008 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
i think your ring is just beautiful the way it is, but it's you that must be happy. i wish you well in whatever you decide!
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 7:40:35 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 9:42:33 PM | |
|
dutchgirl Rough Rock Total Posts: 53 Last Post: 5/31/2006 Member Since: 2/21/2005 |
Thanks for all of your compliments! I am certain now that I'm going to increase the center and decrease the sides. I had originally thought that the 50% sides would be small enough, but unfortunately I was wrong.  I've always been drawn to the bigger center, smaller sides and SO WISH we had known the result before we started this process...but like Mara said, sometimes you just never know until it's on your hand. That's the chance you take with custom work.I don't have a wedding band and might not go that route at all...so I have to make sure I LOVE this e-ring because it will count for both! Budget-wise, we could go up in size/carat, but we don't want to go crazy. Probably .75 max if it's workable with the current setting. I'm going to contact WF again and see what they say. Thanks again...I'll let you know what happens and send more pics if I can!
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 9:42:33 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 10:19:01 PM | |
windowshopper Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,023 Last Post: 7/25/2006 Member Since: 7/11/2004 |
"From what WF told me, I can go bigger in the center but not TOO much, otherwise they would need to re-create a whole new ring. If I took the center up to .65 and the sides down to .19 it might work?"
|
| Posted: 4/9/2005 10:19:01 PM | |
| P: 4/9/2005 10:23:19 PM | |
|
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,896 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
Good luck and let us know what Whiteflash has to say.
____________________________ |
| Posted: 4/9/2005 10:23:19 PM | |
| P: 4/10/2005 1:35:30 AM | |
ame Ideal Rock Total Posts: 3,452 Last Post: 2/7/2006 Member Since: 7/7/2004 |
I would have to agree on scale. I tend to feel there needs to be a major visual size difference. Id almost say you need something more like .10 or .15 sidestones. That said, its gorgeous.
|
| Posted: 4/10/2005 1:35:30 AM | |
| P: 4/10/2005 2:10:29 AM | |
lmurden Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,101 Last Post: 6/4/2006 Member Since: 5/3/2004 |
I was actually considering the Vatche Three Stone Ring with my center stone .71ct and two .15 ct on each side so that the center stone would stand out so maybe you should go that small. Continue to work with WF I am sure that they will do what they can do to make you happy. Good luck!
LM |
| Posted: 4/10/2005 2:10:29 AM | |
 Previous Page
|
Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
