|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » which stone is better? both do well on HCA. local appraiser?
|
|
 |
which stone is better? both do well on HCA. local appraiser? |
 |
| P: 3/28/2005 10:29:44 PM | |
targa Rough Rock Total Posts: 50 Last Post: 2/6/2006 Member Since: 12/30/2004 |
Hi, I have found 2 stones which look nice to my untrained eye--wondering if anyone would like to suggest based on numbers which may be better (or better value)?? the inclusions on the si1 are peripheral and could be hidden under a prong. the 1.81 looks bigger but both are brilliant. both are egl certs. 1.81 ct 1.77ct VS2 SI1 G G 7.92 x 7.88 x 4.76 7.78 x 7.68 x 4.86 60.2 depth 61.2 depth 59 table 59 table crown 14% crown 16% pavl 43% pavl 42% girdle med to sl thick girdle thn-med-fac round verygood/very good round/very good/very good slight fluoro no fluoro $11.5K $9.7K also, after i decide- does anyone have a recommeded appraiser in the san francisco bay area (preferably san jose) area who could verify quality?? thanks for the help |
| Posted: 3/28/2005 10:29:44 PM | |
|
There are 1 replies to this message. There are 1 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 3/28/2005 11:46:50 PM | |
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,584 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
You have rounded % data which is not great - but the #'s do look good. There are appraisers in the listing in the top right corner. You could also DIY a bit more with an ideal-scope. Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 3/28/2005 11:46:50 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
