![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Experts--is this still AGS000? |
![]() |
| P: 3/16/2005 11:10:28 AM | |
elmo65 Rough Rock Total Posts: 72 Last Post: 6/22/2007 Member Since: 7/22/2004 |
Hit enter accidentally! Anyway, bought a HOF AGS 000 in October,and want to know if these measurements are still AGS0 under new requirements... Table: 55% CA: 34.6 PA: 40.9 Girdle .7- 1.5 crown depth: 15.6% pav depth: 43.1% total depth: 61.7% culet pointed It seems like it is on the border of the new AGS0 requirements when I look on the HCA. I still love the stone, but am wondering if it would be considered an AGS 1 now? What do you think of this stone? It is 2.01 E SI1 |
| Posted: 3/16/2005 11:10:28 AM | |
![]() |
There are 5 replies to this message. There are 5 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 3/16/2005 11:27:23 AM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
I don't think the HCA chart incorporates the new AGS standard. Where did you find it ? This below is the old GS0 bracket: ![]() If the stone is large enough for it's weight (which it is) and brilliant (which the HCA may predict by numbers and an IdealScope or other measurement toold would tell for sure)... and the price is right... why would the new AGS0 standard matter ? Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 3/16/2005 11:27:23 AM | |
| P: 3/16/2005 12:13:04 PM | |
|
DiamondLil Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,405 Last Post: 6/1/2006 Member Since: 6/8/2003 |
I saved this somewhere along the way. It's similar to the one Valeria attached, but it shows the old versus new AGS-0 specs. Hope this helps. DiamondLil ![]() DiamondLil ________________ "Diamonds are nothing more than chunks of coal that stuck to their jobs." |
| Posted: 3/16/2005 12:13:04 PM | |
| P: 3/16/2005 1:58:35 PM | |
|
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,586 Last Post: 11/25/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
the new standard uses the proportions only to aid cutters to achieve the grade. Many factors need to be lined up - and if all the minor facets and things are great - then a stone can be outside those parameters on the chart and still be AGS 0 Your stone looks like it is OK. The most recent charts have a few small variations from those published in September. Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 3/16/2005 1:58:35 PM | |
| P: 3/16/2005 9:46:34 PM | |
elmo65 Rough Rock Total Posts: 72 Last Post: 6/22/2007 Member Since: 7/22/2004 |
Thank you Garry, I value your opinion quite a lot!
|
| Posted: 3/16/2005 9:46:34 PM | |
| P: 3/16/2005 10:16:19 PM | |
Maxine Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,394 Last Post: 10/25/2009 Member Since: 12/6/2004 |
Is there a different graph for each table size???
|
| Posted: 3/16/2005 10:16:19 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives