![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
59.9% Total Depth? |
![]() |
| P: 3/13/2005 2:12:29 PM | |
BluePea Rough Rock Total Posts: 51 Last Post: 2/13/2006 Member Since: 3/3/2005 |
Is 59.9% total depth too low? Would there be any potential negative implications for the visual performance of an otherwise well cut diamond - table 56%, crown angle 34, pavilion angle 40.6?
|
| Posted: 3/13/2005 2:12:29 PM | |
![]() |
There are 12 replies to this message. There are 12 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 3/13/2005 2:17:45 PM | |
Maxine Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,394 Last Post: 10/25/2009 Member Since: 12/6/2004 |
Sounds like it's just right!!!!!
|
| Posted: 3/13/2005 2:17:45 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 2:18:54 PM | |
|
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,919 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
I agree with maxine, sounds good. Have you seen the stone?
____________________________ |
| Posted: 3/13/2005 2:18:54 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 2:21:35 PM | |
|
Lord Summerisle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 859 Last Post: 11/19/2009 Member Since: 12/14/2004 |
nope. - Mine is a 59.9% depth (57.1 table, 34.8c 40.6pav) looks stunning... just means your getting a really good diameter for the size.
_____________________ |
| Posted: 3/13/2005 2:21:35 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 2:23:11 PM | |
BluePea Rough Rock Total Posts: 51 Last Post: 2/13/2006 Member Since: 3/3/2005 |
I wish I had seen it! We are buying online, and this makes things more difficult, even though I like the fact that I can "browse" so many diamonds, something that I wouldn't be able to do at a b&m with limited stock. According to Jim at Dirt Cheap Diamonds, the ideal range for depth is 60.2% - 62.7% http://www.dirtcheapdiamonds.com/diamonds101.cfm
|
| Posted: 3/13/2005 2:23:11 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 2:31:52 PM | |
|
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,919 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
Can we have a link to the actual stone, I'd like to see it.
____________________________ |
| Posted: 3/13/2005 2:31:52 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 2:35:15 PM | |
|
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,582 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
the only thing is do not set it in a exposed girdle setting because the thin girdle is on the border of very thin and could chip. A rubbed in bezel or at least a 6 prong setting - never a 4 prong Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 3/13/2005 2:35:15 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 5:16:52 PM | |
|
Lord Summerisle Ideal Rock Total Posts: 859 Last Post: 11/19/2009 Member Since: 12/14/2004 |
to quote cool runnings.... 'ummm too laaaite' its thin to medium.. and well iv put up the ring design... _____________________ |
| Posted: 3/13/2005 5:16:52 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 10:42:02 PM | |
BluePea Rough Rock Total Posts: 51 Last Post: 2/13/2006 Member Since: 3/3/2005 |
Here is the link:
|
| Posted: 3/13/2005 10:42:02 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 10:52:51 PM | |
BluePea Rough Rock Total Posts: 51 Last Post: 2/13/2006 Member Since: 3/3/2005 |
This diamond seems to have two differend photos on DCD's website: If you click on the "camera" icon from the signature series search page you get this: ![]()
|
| Posted: 3/13/2005 10:52:51 PM | |
| P: 3/13/2005 10:54:11 PM | |
BluePea Rough Rock Total Posts: 51 Last Post: 2/13/2006 Member Since: 3/3/2005 |
This looks very different from the link posted above. Do people think it is possible this is the same diamond?
|
| Posted: 3/13/2005 10:54:11 PM | |
| P: 3/14/2005 1:17:18 AM | |
|
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,582 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
Sample image means "sample image"
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 3/14/2005 1:17:18 AM | |
| P: 3/14/2005 6:12:49 AM | |
|
Regular Guy Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,324 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 7/7/2004 |
At the DCD website, the diamond is described as having a girdle of .9 - 1.9, and at the tutorial here, I read that thin is regarded as .6 (thanks, btw, for the other abbreviations included at the tutorial). Garry, if you're saying it's bordering on very thin, based on the depth, is there some discrepant info here?
Ira (Ruffles have Ridges) Z. |
| Posted: 3/14/2005 6:12:49 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives