![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
| Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
|
![]() |
Ladies...Please help me decide |
![]() |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:02:12 PM | |
pajj Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 2/20/2005 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
I'm trying to decide on a setting for a round 1.76 carat, H color diamond I picked out. My girlfriend's ring size is approximately 5.25. I've attached some pictures, below, of the settings I am considering. Which setting would you pick? Your opinions are most appreciated. #1 - Scott Kay
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:02:12 PM | |
![]() |
There are 44 replies to this message. There are 30 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:10:28 PM | |
|
Outlander Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 1/20/2005 Member Since: 1/15/2005 |
Well, so far, I like number 1
Erin |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:10:28 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:12:08 PM | |
pajj Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 2/20/2005 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
#1 Scott Kay - different angle![]()
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:12:08 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:13:34 PM | |
pajj Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 2/20/2005 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
#2 Custom setting![]()
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:13:34 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:15:01 PM | |
pajj Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 2/20/2005 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
#3 Another Scott Kay setting but with channel diamonds.![]()
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:15:01 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:20:45 PM | |
|
Outlander Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 1/20/2005 Member Since: 1/15/2005 |
Oh, I thought this was going to be easy! Those are all really pretty. I think I still like #1.
Erin |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:20:45 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:20:52 PM | |
pajj Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 2/20/2005 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
#4 Custom setting![]()
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:20:52 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:21:39 PM | |
|
KBerly Ideal Rock Total Posts: 964 Last Post: 1/16/2007 Member Since: 4/21/2004 |
i love teebee's and slammie's ring, so i say #2 & #4
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:21:39 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:21:48 PM | |
pajj Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 2/20/2005 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
#4 A different angle![]()
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:21:48 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:24:42 PM | |
|
Outlander Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 1/20/2005 Member Since: 1/15/2005 |
Pajj, is there a diamond on both sides of the SK, or just one?
Erin |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:24:42 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:27:27 PM | |
pajj Rough Rock Total Posts: 17 Last Post: 2/20/2005 Member Since: 9/14/2004 |
Erin, There is a diamond on both sides of the two types of Scott Kay settings I posted. He calls it a "surprise diamond."
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:27:27 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:31:26 PM | |
|
Outlander Rough Rock Total Posts: 23 Last Post: 1/20/2005 Member Since: 1/15/2005 |
I really like the style, but I am wondering where you would put the wedding band? I guess it would have to be custom made, so it wouldn't hide the diamond? Oh, but if it's a "surprise" diamond, then maybe it's supposed to be hidden by the wedding band!? Anyway, I still like it.
Erin |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:31:26 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 5:36:46 PM | |
Cath Cut Rock Total Posts: 373 Last Post: 8/17/2005 Member Since: 9/29/2004 |
Wow, three stone setting vs. solitaire...a lot of this boils down to personal preference. Do you know if your girlfriend likes one over the other? Of the three stones, I like #1. Of the solitaires, I like #2. I am a solitaire kind of girl, so my personal favorite is #2 (love Teebee's ring!!)
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 5:36:46 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 6:53:37 PM | |
NyssaLynne Cut Rock Total Posts: 353 Last Post: 7/3/2005 Member Since: 12/21/2004 |
I think #1 is your best choice for a small size finger. I also like the Scott Kay version with the channel set diamonds but I think it would be just too much for a finger that small. Doesn't SK make matching wedding bands for that style? Lynne~ |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 6:53:37 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 8:23:00 PM | |
mkbat Rough Rock Total Posts: 14 Last Post: 1/5/2006 Member Since: 12/19/2004 |
#2 Mona Khoury |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 8:23:00 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 8:26:00 PM | |
sahmama Rough Rock Total Posts: 48 Last Post: 4/4/2005 Member Since: 11/16/2004 |
#3 or #4 get my vote.
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 8:26:00 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 8:37:23 PM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
SK looks like a very high setting better suited to small diamonds. If the proportions remains the same for you stone, I bet that will be hovering 1cm or so above the finger and that's quite allot for any ring, let alone a small ring size. High settings are not the most confortable - some like them so, but one needs to really like the type to adjust. The others designs seem more likely to be easily adjusted to any size of stone and ring, IMO. Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 8:37:23 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 9:01:49 PM | |
|
sharonb Rough Rock Total Posts: 21 Last Post: 9/26/2005 Member Since: 8/5/2004 |
Like #1, LOVE #4. The detail is beautiful. May I ask who the designer is?
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 9:01:49 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 9:12:11 PM | |
|
Libster Ideal Rock Total Posts: 998 Last Post: 9/18/2009 Member Since: 10/21/2004 |
I have a 3 stone that I personally love, but my center stone is much smaller than your stone. That said, you have a very large stone that can hold it's own and I can only imagine it would look amazing in a setting like Slammie's, which I LOVE Good luck and please post pics of your stone and your final choice, we'd love to see it
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 9:12:11 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 9:15:40 PM | |
|
fortheloveofdiamonds Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,279 Last Post: 7/4/2006 Member Since: 10/8/2004 |
Date: 1/19/2005 9 1:49 PMAuthor: sharonb Like #1, LOVE #4. The detail is beautiful. May I ask who the designer is? #4 is slammie's ring. It was custom designed you can find the link to her post here !
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 9:15:40 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 9:55:16 PM | |
windowshopper Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,023 Last Post: 7/25/2006 Member Since: 7/11/2004 |
Date: 1/19/2005 5:21:48 PM #4 is the only one ................................heads and shoulders above the others.
Author: pajj #4 A different angle
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 9:55:16 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 10:39:54 PM | |
|
headlight Ideal Rock Total Posts: 656 Last Post: 8/19/2009 Member Since: 11/2/2003 |
No question... #4, without a doubt!
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 10:39:54 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 11:08:55 PM | |
|
Emeraldgirl Cut Rock Total Posts: 470 Last Post: 3/29/2005 Member Since: 11/11/2004 |
#1 without a doubt it's stunning
When the doors of perception are cleansed people will see things as they truely are - Jim Morrison |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 11:08:55 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 11:20:08 PM | |
|
lindsaylou Rough Rock Total Posts: 4 Last Post: 3/4/2007 Member Since: 12/30/2004 |
i love #4!!! I think it really shows the diamond off well.
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 11:20:08 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 11:41:45 PM | |
|
mrssalvo Ideal Rock Total Posts: 16,860 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 1/3/2005 |
i vote for #4. all are very pretty but #4...WOW!!
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 11:41:45 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 11:44:06 PM | |
|
Kaleigh Ideal Rock Total Posts: 25,920 Last Post: 11/24/2009 Member Since: 11/18/2004 |
They are all very pretty, but if pressed I'd go with #4!!
____________________________ |
| Posted: 1/19/2005 11:44:06 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 11:48:04 PM | |
rosy Cut Rock Total Posts: 422 Last Post: 1/29/2006 Member Since: 10/7/2004 |
# 4 gets my vote. It's gorgeous! Makes me jealous, my ring is a plain solitaire band close in size to your diamond. One of these days I might reset......
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 11:48:04 PM | |
| P: 1/19/2005 11:52:48 PM | |
allan creates Rough Rock Total Posts: 28 Last Post: 4/29/2005 Member Since: 10/6/2004 |
#1 Classic standard well proportioned. #2 No good… nothing to look at… it’s just an eternity blank with a peg setting. #3 Okay a little more umff than # 1… same category. #4 No good… too many do dads… trying to be something it can’t. These are the opinions of an old master at design and quality. Allan Creates http://www.ringlock.com P.F.F. Ring Clasps
|
| Posted: 1/19/2005 11:52:48 PM | |
| P: 1/20/2005 12:03:40 AM | |
windowshopper Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,023 Last Post: 7/25/2006 Member Since: 7/11/2004 |
Date: 1/19/2005 11:52:48 PM ????????????????????/
Author: allan creates #1 Classic standard well proportioned. #2 No good… nothing to look at… it’s just an eternity blank with a peg setting. #3 Okay a little more umff than # 1… same category. #4 No good… too many do dads… trying to be something it can’t. These are the opinions of an old master at design and quality. Allan Creates http://www.ringlock.com P.F.F. Ring Clasps
|
| Posted: 1/20/2005 12:03:40 AM | |
| P: 1/20/2005 12:42:10 AM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Date: 1/19/2005 11:52:48 PM Author: allan creates #4 No good… too many do dads… trying to be something it can’t. These are the opinions of an old master at design and quality. Allan Creates http://www.ringlock.com P.F.F. Ring Clasps Ok... it is all a matter of taste and I can't say I do not understand the comments. The last one is a bit puzzling: what is left to be disired by the fourth design ? No blatant faux pas comes to mind
Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 1/20/2005 12:42:10 AM | |
| P: 1/20/2005 2:29:10 AM | |
|
qtiekiki Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,670 Last Post: 11/25/2009 Member Since: 11/14/2004 |
I like all the settings... really depends on what your gurl likes. Things to add: I have a 3 stone ring with the center stone (1.25ct) larger and set higher than the sidestones (.25 ct ea). I feel like I get a mix between a 3 stone and a solitiare because the sidestones are relative small compare to the center stone and not taking away from it and yet it still have 3 stones. pic of my ering __________________________ |
| Posted: 1/20/2005 2:29:10 AM | |
|
|
Pages: 1 of 2: [1] 2 > |
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives