Whiteflash
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » round diamond rates 1.7 on hca


  

 round diamond rates 1.7 on hca

P:  1/4/2005 3:58:42 AM  
rosy
rosy

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 422
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 10/7/2004
 
Hi,
How could I expect this diamond to perform? 

score:        1.7
light return: excellent
fire:            excellent
scintillation:  very good
spread:        excellent

The scintillation receiving a very good while everything else is excellent, how will this affect the performance?



 


Posted:  1/4/2005 3:58:42 AM

 There are 13 replies to this message.  There are 13 replies on this page.

P: 1/4/2005 4:34:45 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,584
Last Post: 11/24/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
rosy you know we need more than the HCA score.
Copy and paste the chart and proportions and i will help you.

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  1/4/2005 4:34:45 AM
P: 1/5/2005 4:57:04 AM
rosy
rosy

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 422
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 10/7/2004
 

Here are the specs on the diamond:
1.54   7.49 x 7.53 x 4.51
depth: 60.1%
table:  60%
crown angle: 33.4 degrees
pavillion %:     43.4%
pavillion angle: 41 degrees

The vendor does not provide pavillion angles so I calculated it using the ATAN function, not sure if this is entirely accurate.  In any case I used the pavillion % when arriving at the HCA score of 1.6 TIC.  When I used the pavillion angle I get a 1.7 TIC.  

I tried to paste the HCA chart here but am not able to.  Would it be possilbe to tell how this diamond will perform?


























Posted:  1/5/2005 4:57:04 AM
P: 1/5/2005 8:08:25 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,584
Last Post: 11/24/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
Seems worthy of sending for appraisal Rosy.

Remeber this indicates what it might look like if the symmetry is perfect etc - not what it "does look like"
 

 

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  1/5/2005 8:08:25 AM
P: 1/5/2005 12:21:32 PM
rosy
rosy

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 422
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 10/7/2004
 
Thanks Garry,
Both the polish & symmetry are excellent.  I'm not quite sure how to interpret the ideal scope image.  Is there anything that indicates on it if theres much light leakage, etc? Also was it alright of me to calculate the pavillion angle with the ATAN function?
thanks again,
Rosy 

Posted:  1/5/2005 12:21:32 PM
P: 1/5/2005 5:08:55 PM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,584
Last Post: 11/24/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
yes except that if there iis a 1% culet then you will get a shallower result for the pavilion.
 
Usually depth % results in understatement of pav angle by about 0.2 degrees - whigh can be significant - but the ideal-scope DiamCacl model from your data suggests it will be a very nice stone and all the #'s do indeed add up assuming the stone has a medium girdle.
If the girdle is extremely thin then the stone will be too deep and leaky. If the girdle is extremely thick then it will be too shallow and dark.

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  1/5/2005 5:08:55 PM
P: 1/6/2005 1:20:01 AM
rosy
rosy

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 422
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 10/7/2004
 
Thank you Garry, I was a little worried when I saw the depth & table of this stone, it's a 60.1/60 since I've heard that stones of these proportions are really not nice.  I guess it's got a lot more to do with the crown & pavillion measurements, so I hope I luck out.  Thanks for that ideal scope picture, I can't wait to see the diamond, I go in tomorrow.  I will let everyone know if it's a winner, I'm keeping my fingers crossed! 

Posted:  1/6/2005 1:20:01 AM
P: 1/7/2005 2:52:33 AM
rosy
rosy

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 422
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 10/7/2004
 
Well I just got back from viewing the 1.54 ring.  It was nice & bright white & looked really big from the top.  Unfortuneatly it didn't capture my heart because from the side it looked very short, flat & wide.  I think it's because the table being 60% was so large that you didn't see that nice rounded shape at the top of the diamond when viewing from the side.  I thought it looked out of proportion.  It was also set very low.  I compared it to another diamond that was the same carat weight but had a smaller table 56% & from the side the 56% table looked slightly taller & that gave it just enough to make it look well proportioned.  I never used to think the side of a diamond matters but you do look at it from all angles.  I couldn't justify spending thousands more for a ring I really didn't love.  I've decided to keep the 1.38,  It didn't look like there was too much of a difference in size anyway. I am very disappointed though that this 60% table ring didn't work out. 

Posted:  1/7/2005 2:52:33 AM
P: 1/7/2005 3:44:58 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,584
Last Post: 11/24/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
aha - theissue of VERTICLE spread

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  1/7/2005 3:44:58 AM
P: 1/7/2005 4:41:56 AM
rosy
rosy

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 422
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 10/7/2004
 
Hey Garry,
Care to elaborate?

Posted:  1/7/2005 4:41:56 AM
P: 1/7/2005 6:34:04 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,584
Last Post: 11/24/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
Imagine a woman lying on her back at the beach?

No no no!!!!

What you mean is some diamonds stand proud of the mounting and have as much as 1/2 their carat weight above the setting - and some - like princess cuts - have it all in the butt and little up top !!!!!
 

 

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  1/7/2005 6:34:04 AM
P: 1/11/2005 2:42:58 AM
rosy
rosy

Cut Rock
Total Posts: 422
Last Post: 1/29/2006
Member Since: 10/7/2004
 
Oh I see.  I guess diamonds are like people, need to look proportional from all angles, that's probably why they invented three way mirrors.

Posted:  1/11/2005 2:42:58 AM
P: 1/11/2005 3:25:01 AM
Garry H (Cut Nut)
Garry H (Cut Nut)

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 11,584
Last Post: 11/24/2009
Member Since: 8/16/2000
 
yes, nice lookers can be nasty
and ugly ones can be really nice (like me)

Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT

HCA and Ideal-scope developer

http://www.ideal-scope.com and
http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au

Posted:  1/11/2005 3:25:01 AM
P: 1/11/2005 3:52:16 AM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 
  Yeah , flat crown gets lost in a setting - that's a sinkhole, not a diamond! ... sorry

Although, it doesn't matter if you want to peg the ring on a wall and look only straight down to it.

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  1/11/2005 3:52:16 AM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Designer Wedding Sets «» Opinion on diamond and price (from Australia) »
Next Topics
SI1 eye clean: How clean is clean? Maine Appraisers Two Thumbs up for Signed Pieces Customer Service to reena and moremoremore...............and anyone else Diamonds in New York What other rare stones are out there for an engagement rings? Identify this setting type please... What is surface graining? My Journey with Mark Turnowski @EngagementRingsDirect.com What do you think of this ring/diamond combo? OldMiner...... How to become a gemologist What is the name of this setting? ARE VS2's supposed to have naked eye flaws?? HELP! Question for Canadians Lucida ESQUE engagement ring SAGA Is 10% off rapaport a good deal? please help a newbie Is there a noticeable size difference at 1.50 carats? What to do when you can't have your e-ring and your wedding band too? Was everyone else as indecisive as me? Appraisal: Ottawa, Ontario Jeweler to the Stars Diamonds on a Thin Band We are on top of the worldResults of to How does this sound? Looking for Direction in Buying a Diamond - Help from the Experts Insurance Calling all cushion experts Neat .gif of a diamond Asscher expertise needed question on loading jpeg file Tacori ring, do you think the prongs are bulky

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives