|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » opinions on idealscope and sarin...
|
|
 |
opinions on idealscope and sarin... |
 |
| P: 12/23/2004 6:48:38 PM | |
cryckman Rough Rock Total Posts: 55 Last Post: 12/23/2004 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
Here it is... what do you all think!
|
| Posted: 12/23/2004 6:48:38 PM | |
|
There are 6 replies to this message. There are 6 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 12/23/2004 6:49:37 PM | |
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Princess cut ?
Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 12/23/2004 6:49:37 PM | |
| P: 12/23/2004 6:50:38 PM | |
|
cryckman Rough Rock Total Posts: 55 Last Post: 12/23/2004 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
yes... I'm trying to attach the ideal scope image, but it won't let me!
|
| Posted: 12/23/2004 6:50:38 PM | |
| P: 12/23/2004 7:57:48 PM | |
|
uclaure Rough Rock Total Posts: 93 Last Post: 4/18/2005 Member Since: 4/5/2004 |
i'm by no means an expert, but there might be an issue with the girdle thickness. the sarin states that the avg is 1.8, not bad at all, but......examining the min and max we see that there's a great variance...0 to 2.8%. this might be a typo, but if not, i would definately pass on any stone that that has even a section of the girdle that is almost paper thin. my .02.
uclaure |
| Posted: 12/23/2004 7:57:48 PM | |
| P: 12/23/2004 8:03:32 PM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Date: 12/23/2004 7:57:48 PM Author: uclaure the sarin states that the avg is 1.8, not bad at all, but......examining the min and max we see that there's a great variance...0 to 2.8% Yeah... these tables. It must be typo since those numbers do not add up. The mid between min and max is 1.8 and max is 2.6... then min is 1, noy 0% And that's not too bad. Since Iscope picture is there, than this stone should be in the seller's stock - so they could do the reality check for you. You may want to rename the Iscope picture (say, to an odd XXcTRS.jpg). Make it GIF or JPG format... Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 12/23/2004 8:03:32 PM | |
| P: 12/23/2004 8:35:57 PM | |
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,579 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
Give the file a very unusual name - not one that has been used before
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 12/23/2004 8:35:57 PM | |
| P: 12/23/2004 9:22:05 PM | |
|
cryckman Rough Rock Total Posts: 55 Last Post: 12/23/2004 Member Since: 11/19/2004 |
I posted the idealscope under a new topic called idealscope.
|
| Posted: 12/23/2004 9:22:05 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
