![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» Colored Stones
» |
|
![]() |
What do YOU feel is an acceptable emerald enhancement |
![]() |
| P: 10/24/2004 8:02:09 PM | |
|
Mayacamas Rough Rock Total Posts: 83 Last Post: 12/22/2007 Member Since: 10/3/2004 |
Hello, I have been the consistant emerald question poster, but here is a real doozie!
What do we now consider an acceptable treatment (dare I say desireable)? Lets assume that the dealer states openly its treated with:
Cedarwood oil?
Polymer that wont fade and IS removable?
Opticon?
Does the choice of what type of treatment affect value- i.e. if treated with cedar oil its worth so much per carat, and if treated with opticon its worth (less? more?)
Thanks,
Mayacamas
|
| Posted: 10/24/2004 8:02:09 PM | |
![]() |
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 10/25/2004 2:33:37 PM | |
|
Richard Hughes Cut Rock Total Posts: 320 Last Post: 10/14/2008 Member Since: 9/27/2004 |
If I am going to own a treated emerald (and virtually all of them are), I would prefer to have one that has the fractures/fissures filled with a hardened resin, such as that used by Arthur Groom. This resin is far more stable than unhardened resins (such as Opticon) or oils (such as cedarwood oil). While we are on the subject of emerald treatments, I should mention that the term "natural oil" is an oxymoron. The very process of treating an emerald is not a natural process. Thus it is ridiculous to suggest that the insertion of a "natural" oil is somehow better. Richard W. Hughes |
| Posted: 10/25/2004 2:33:37 PM | |
| P: 10/25/2004 2:42:35 PM | |
|
katbadness Cut Rock Total Posts: 459 Last Post: 8/25/2005 Member Since: 1/29/2004 |
---------------- I'm so glad you replied to this, rubydick! I was quite confused by this issue as well... Sellers I've talked to tout the 'natural oil' treatment as better than resin treatment - as it is much closer to "natural" emerald (even though resin filling will definitely be more stabilizing). They were drawing parallel to 'low heat' to corundums vs. Beryllium enhanced treatment.
|
| Posted: 10/25/2004 2:42:35 PM | |
| P: 10/25/2004 8:19:04 PM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Here's one little story: The nicer emeralds I get to see around here come with either pernament filler or cedar oil. The less needy emeralds seem to come oiled rather than treated with permanent filler. The reason I've been given for this is that the temporary treatment can be removed upon buyers' request. At a first glance, it appears reasonable to use different treatments according to need. I cannot know if this is just a local oddity. Is it ? Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 10/25/2004 8:19:04 PM | |
| P: 10/26/2004 1:40:41 PM | |
|
Richard Hughes Cut Rock Total Posts: 320 Last Post: 10/14/2008 Member Since: 9/27/2004 |
Actually, Arthur Groom's hardened filler can also be removed if need be. But the idea of a hardened filler is that it will not leak out.
Richard W. Hughes |
| Posted: 10/26/2004 1:40:41 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives