|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » D-VS2 Please evaluate I need to make a decision
|
|
 |
D-VS2 Please evaluate I need to make a decision |
 |
| P: 9/24/2004 2:36:34 PM | |
whistler Rough Rock Total Posts: 4 Last Post: 9/24/2004 Member Since: 9/24/2004 |
can someone please give me feedback if there are any flaws I should be concerned with. On HCA I think it scored a 1.8. I am worried about the pavillion and table measurements round bril 1.24 carats Depth = 60.3% Table = 59.3% Crown = 34 Pavilion = 41 Girdle = Slightly Thick to Thick Culet = None Polish = Excellent Symmetry = Excellent Clarity = VS2 Color = D Fluorescence = Med Blue any feedback is welcome
|
| Posted: 9/24/2004 2:36:34 PM | |
|
There are 6 replies to this message. There are 6 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 9/24/2004 3:14:56 PM | |
Lynn B Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,143 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 5/9/2004 |
No expert here, but here's my humble 2 cents! I ran it through the HCA and it got 1.8/TIC, EX, VG, VG, EX. That's great! You want a score under "2". Have you seen this stone in person? Do you love it? I only ask because... do you have your heart set on a "D" color? You're paying a premium for that, and you could go lower on the color scale and still get a very white diamond. Also, the clarity, at VS2 is awesome... but there are lots of people here with totally gorgeous, eyeclean SI's... another place to save some money. (And money saved means more money to use for a larger stone, or for the setting, or towards the honeymoon... you get the idea!)    Please don't get me wrong... D/VS2 is a real winner, for sure!  And there are folks here who LOVE their "D" color stones, and don't want to settle for "less"! I personally have a G, and if I ever upgrade, I'll definitely look even lower... I have found that I LOVE the look of slightly warmer colored diamonds... and when they are well cut, they face up VERY white and beautiful. So...just trying to point out that there are options you may not be thinking of. Please keep us posted! Lynn PS Also, do you have the diameter measurements? Is it "nice and round" (w/ nice, tight parameters)? PPS The medium flourescence also has the potential to be VERY COOL... there are some posters here who favor flourescent stones. Only one small caveat to watch for... SOMETIMES in a colorless stone, the flourescence can make the diamond appear milky or oily when in bright sunlight. But that's rare. And it's also easy to check... just look at it! If that doesn't happen, then it's my understanding that you have nothing to worry about... and a VERY COOL ring at the nightclub! And THAT'S my story and I'm sticking to it! |
| Posted: 9/24/2004 3:14:56 PM | |
| P: 9/24/2004 3:20:01 PM | |
quaeritur Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,238 Last Post: 2/3/2005 Member Since: 3/12/2004 |
I agree with Lynn -I'd like to see the diameter too. It looks like it could be very nice. My only concern from the numbers are the slightly large table and the thickish girdle. The diameter for a 1.24ct should be just a hair under 7mm, and with extra weight in the larger table and girdle, this stone might look smaller than that. Just something to consider. Given the HCA score, I suspect it will perform nicely. Can you get and IdealScope image for it? quaeritur |
| Posted: 9/24/2004 3:20:01 PM | |
| P: 9/24/2004 3:23:37 PM | |
ame Ideal Rock Total Posts: 3,452 Last Post: 2/7/2006 Member Since: 7/7/2004 |
Get the rest of those measurements. Otherwise it sounds Stunningly beautiful.
|
| Posted: 9/24/2004 3:23:37 PM | |
| P: 9/24/2004 3:46:42 PM | |
|
whistler Rough Rock Total Posts: 4 Last Post: 9/24/2004 Member Since: 9/24/2004 |
I am worried about the table being 59. but here are those other numbers 6.92-6.95 x 4.18 I really appreciate the quick responses.. thanks!! no pics as of yet I will try
|
| Posted: 9/24/2004 3:46:42 PM | |
| P: 9/24/2004 3:53:44 PM | |
|
whistler Rough Rock Total Posts: 4 Last Post: 9/24/2004 Member Since: 9/24/2004 |
Lynn B your comments are definetly right. I feel D is over kill. but my girlfriend and I are Type-A engineer dorks and I know she would appreciate the quality. most people will only comment that the size is not that big, but she will know and thats what counts thanks again for the feedback
|
| Posted: 9/24/2004 3:53:44 PM | |
| P: 9/24/2004 5:21:53 PM | |
|
whistler Rough Rock Total Posts: 4 Last Post: 9/24/2004 Member Since: 9/24/2004 |
are these good numbers? 6.92-6.95 x 4.18 should I worry about the table being 59
|
| Posted: 9/24/2004 5:21:53 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
