|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » need some help deciding
|
|
 |
need some help deciding |
 |
| P: 8/25/2004 2:16:08 AM | |
aj55 Rough Rock Total Posts: 70 Last Post: 12/2/2004 Member Since: 7/25/2004 |
i have 3 choices of canadian ags0 ideal cut diamonds. They are all SF1 and F colour: 1) Carat Weight: .728 Depth %: 61.8 Table %: 54 Crown Angle: 34.7 Pavillion Angle: 40.6 Culet: Pointed Price: $5165 US Dollars HCA Score: 0.9 Light Return: Excellent Fire: Excellent Scintillation: Excellent Spread or diameter for weight: Very Good 2) Carat Weight: .732 Depth %: 59.7 Table %: 58 Crown Angle: 34 Pavillion Angle: 40.7 Culet: Pointed Price: $3660 USD HCA Score: 0.8 Light Return: Excellent Fire: Excellent Scintillation: Excellent Spread or diameter for weight: Excellent 1) Carat Weight: .776 Depth %: 62.1 Table %: 55 Crown Angle: 35 Pavillion Angle: 40.7 Culet: Price: $3810 USD HCA Score: 1.2 Light Return: Excellent Fire: Excellent Scintillation: Excellent Spread or diameter for weight: Very Good |
| Posted: 8/25/2004 2:16:08 AM | |
|
There are 11 replies to this message. There are 11 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 8/25/2004 7:24:45 AM | |
wonka27 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 628 Last Post: 9/13/2007 Member Since: 6/22/2004 |
#1 seems way too expensive #3 looks like the depth could be a little deep
|
| Posted: 8/25/2004 7:24:45 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 9:59:51 AM | |
|
aj55 Rough Rock Total Posts: 70 Last Post: 12/2/2004 Member Since: 7/25/2004 |
Sorry...my bad the price of #1 is $3620 USD. I had it listed in CDN.
|
| Posted: 8/25/2004 9:59:51 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 10:54:36 AM | |
quaeritur Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,238 Last Post: 2/3/2005 Member Since: 3/12/2004 |
I like #1, then #2, then #3. Or #1, then #3, then #2. But I like #1 best from the #s. Still, they all look like fantastic choices!!!  Do you have IS images? quaeritur |
| Posted: 8/25/2004 10:54:36 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 10:55:23 AM | |
|
quaeritur Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,238 Last Post: 2/3/2005 Member Since: 3/12/2004 |
How are the girdles? On #3 in particular?
quaeritur |
| Posted: 8/25/2004 10:55:23 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 11:04:29 AM | |
noobie Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,318 Last Post: 9/21/2007 Member Since: 3/3/2004 |
Can you go and look at them in person? If so, just pick the one that looks the best to you.
Gee Q we're going to have to stop agreeing so much, I like #1 best form the numbers as well, but don't forget "inonothing"
|
| Posted: 8/25/2004 11:04:29 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 11:26:14 AM | |
|
aj55 Rough Rock Total Posts: 70 Last Post: 12/2/2004 Member Since: 7/25/2004 |
girdle for #1: 1.2%-1.9% girdle for #2: 0.7%-1.4% girdle for #3: 1.5%-1.9%
|
| Posted: 8/25/2004 11:26:14 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 11:36:19 AM | |
bling Cut Rock Total Posts: 487 Last Post: 5/17/2005 Member Since: 4/17/2003 |
They all look like very nice choices! I like #2 just a tad more..dont really know why..all the numbers just seem right on.. but again..either one seems like a winner choice. can you go and see them in person? how are the inclusion.. im not sure i know what SF1 is.. good luck!
|
| Posted: 8/25/2004 11:36:19 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 11:54:21 AM | |
Josh@JA Cut Rock Total Posts: 366 Last Post: 2/18/2008 Member Since: 9/11/2003 |
I think that #1 is the best choice. However, I will compare it to another if that's okay. It's always easier to make a decision when you can compare to something similar. Cash Price: $3,214 Stock Number: 7034707 Shape: Signature Ideal Laboratory: AGS Carat Weight: .708 Color: F Clarity: VS2 Measurements: 5.70x5.75x3.52 Depth: 61.5% Table: 57% Polish: Ideal Symmetry: Ideal Culet: Pointed Girdle: 1.4-2.6 Fluorescence: None Culet: Pointed Crown Angle : 35.0° Crown %: 15.2 Pavillion Angle : 40.8° Pavillion %: 42.8 Lab Comments: None HCA Score: 1.6-Excellent (WHEN USING ANGLES) Factor Grade Light Return Excellent Fire Excellent Scintillation Excellent Spread or diameter for weight Very Good Verses HCA Score: 1-Excellent (WHEN USING PERCENTAGES) Factor Grade Light Return Excellent Fire Excellent Scintillation Excellent Spread or diameter for weight Very Good Hopefully this helps. Good luck!  _______________ |
| Posted: 8/25/2004 11:54:21 AM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 12:33:19 PM | |
|
aj55 Rough Rock Total Posts: 70 Last Post: 12/2/2004 Member Since: 7/25/2004 |
thanks for the info JC, i live in vancouver, bc canada and am considering going with a local jeweller. I also am wanting a CDN Diamond. A little extra $$$I know but worth it for me.
|
| Posted: 8/25/2004 12:33:19 PM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 12:37:43 PM | |
|
Josh@JA Cut Rock Total Posts: 366 Last Post: 2/18/2008 Member Since: 9/11/2003 |
No problem. I just wanted to help by making a comparable suggestion. You'll definitely end up picking a winner though, because you obviously have great taste. CDN diamonds are very popular. I'm sure that you will be very pleased when you make your purchase. Good luck...
_______________ |
| Posted: 8/25/2004 12:37:43 PM | |
| P: 8/25/2004 3:35:37 PM | |
|
aj55 Rough Rock Total Posts: 70 Last Post: 12/2/2004 Member Since: 7/25/2004 |
I have seen diamond #3-.776 cts stone. It is awesome, it is an eye clean sf1. i think i'll have to go see the other stones and compare. Do you think there is big diff between .728 and the .776?
|
| Posted: 8/25/2004 3:35:37 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
