|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » Looking for opinions on some Diamonds for an e-ring
|
|
 |
Looking for opinions on some Diamonds for an e-ring |
 |
| P: 8/23/2004 11:26:46 PM | |
aargh Rough Rock Total Posts: 5 Last Post: 8/24/2004 Member Since: 8/8/2004 |
Hi all, I've been mostly lurking here for the past month while I educated myself (thanks to this site & forum), and tried to narrow down my search for a diamond to go in my fiancee-to-be's engagement ring. I would love any and all opinions on these stones. The setting is a Ritani 3-stone in white gold. I've narrowed the stone down to the following four choices: 1) 1.39 VS2 H, GIA, HCA=0.9, $8632 1.39 VS2 H NOTE: My computer choked on this link for some reason, but when afterwards I went to the URL in the browser and hit enter, it came up fine. 2) 1.27 SI1 G, GIA, HCA=1.2, $7276, 1.27 SI1 G 3) 1.258 SI1 G, AGS, HCA=1.4, $6688 1.258 SI1 G 4) 1.54 SI2 H, AGS, HCA=1.8, $9063, 1.54 SI2 H The SI1's and SI2's are described as "eye clean" by the respective vendors. So what do you think? Thanks! Aargh |
| Posted: 8/23/2004 11:26:46 PM | |
|
There are 5 replies to this message. There are 5 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 8/23/2004 11:31:20 PM | |
Superidealist Ideal Rock Total Posts: 655 Last Post: 8/23/2006 Member Since: 9/10/2003 |
Do not under any circumstance buy the Whiteflash diamonds.
D Riley |
| Posted: 8/23/2004 11:31:20 PM | |
| P: 8/23/2004 11:44:00 PM | |
quaeritur Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,238 Last Post: 2/3/2005 Member Since: 3/12/2004 |
My favorites are #2 and #3. I'd discard #1 out of this lineup because the pavilion angle really is rather shallow -I'd keep it at 40.5 or above, if it were me. #4 Might be nice too, but I like the IS image on #3 better, and also the fact that I can see the inclusions on #4's IS image makes me doubt just how eye clean it is. It might be great, but I'd want pics and more reassurance with that one. All in all, you seem to have a fantastic final lineup! 
quaeritur |
| Posted: 8/23/2004 11:44:00 PM | |
| P: 8/23/2004 11:45:37 PM | |
|
Superidealist Ideal Rock Total Posts: 655 Last Post: 8/23/2006 Member Since: 9/10/2003 |
I'd throw out #3 and #4 (the Whiteflash stones) because it says they're sold. 
D Riley |
| Posted: 8/23/2004 11:45:37 PM | |
| P: 8/24/2004 12:26:58 AM | |
LesleyH Ideal Rock Total Posts: 506 Last Post: 12/23/2008 Member Since: 8/29/2000 |
Wow, D Riley...you almost took my breath away - thanks for the clarification LesleyH www.whiteflash.com Director of Sales at Whiteflash from 2000-2008 |
| Posted: 8/24/2004 12:26:58 AM | |
| P: 8/24/2004 12:29:34 PM | |
|
aargh Rough Rock Total Posts: 5 Last Post: 8/24/2004 Member Since: 8/8/2004 |
Any more opinions?? By the way, the Whiteflash Diamonds show up as "sold" because they're "on hold".
|
| Posted: 8/24/2004 12:29:34 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
