![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
I would appreciate input on these 4 stones... |
![]() |
| P: 8/18/2004 4:01:46 PM | |
|
andrewk Rough Rock Total Posts: 18 Last Post: 9/16/2004 Member Since: 8/10/2004 |
If folks could give me some comments, I would greatly appreciate them. Please look at #4. It looked really good under the ideal scope, even though it looks a little "spready". #1 0.70 ct, G, SI1, AGS 0-0-0 size: 5.82 x 5.79 x 3.53 depth: 60.9 table: 56 crown angle: 34.5 pavillion angle: 41.1 girdle: 0.7-1.4 % fluorescence: none culet: pt symmetry: ideal polish: ideal HCA: 2.4 vg/vg/vg/vg #2 0.75 ct, H, SI1, AGS1 size: 5.91 x 5.89 x 3.61 depth: 61.2 table: 56 crown angle: 34.5 pavillion angle: 41.2 girdle: 0.7-1.2 % fluorescence: none culet: pt symmetry: ideal polish: excellent HCA: 3.1 vg/g/g/vg #3 0.76 ct, G, SI2, AGS 0-0-0 size: 5.85 x 5.82 x 3.65 depth: 62.5 table: 56 crown angle: 35.5 pavillion angle: 40.9 girdle: medium 1.7 % fluorescence: none symmetry: ideal polish: ideal HCA: 3.2 vg/vg/vg/vg #4 0.70 ct, G, VVS2, size: 5.81 x 5.76 x 3.38 depth: 58.4 table: 64 crown angle: 34.7 pavillion angle: 40.3 girdle: medium 1.6 % fluorescence: neg HCA: 2.9 vg/vg/vg/ex |
| Posted: 8/18/2004 4:01:46 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives