![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
opinion on this diamond please |
![]() |
| P: 8/16/2004 12:57:45 PM | |
mississippi_blues Rough Rock Total Posts: 2 Last Post: 8/16/2004 Member Since: 8/16/2004 |
1.62 ct. 7.40 x 7.45 x 4.80mm modern cut slightly thin bruted girdle very small cutlet 64.6% depth 56% table K range color, w/ negligible fluorescence to UV lighting VS1
|
| Posted: 8/16/2004 12:57:45 PM | |
![]() |
There are 2 replies to this message. There are 2 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 8/16/2004 1:15:22 PM | |
|
aljdewey Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,236 Last Post: 2/11/2008 Member Since: 11/25/2002 |
The advice you'd get depends on what you'd want. This diamond is awfully deep....so much so that it only has the diameter (or size) of a 1.45 ct. or so diamond. I personally wouldn't buy such a diamond myself, but my wants may be different from yours. I'd also prefer to see a better balance of color/clarity. VS1 seems to be overbuying at the expense of color. If you bought a better cut RB, the cut would mask enough for you to consider SI1, which would let you raise the color. _____________________ |
| Posted: 8/16/2004 1:15:22 PM | |
| P: 8/16/2004 1:29:57 PM | |
mississippi_blues Rough Rock Total Posts: 2 Last Post: 8/16/2004 Member Since: 8/16/2004 |
This is the diamond in my wife's engagement ring. I gave it to her 15+yrs ago. I didnt care much about the stats years ago, and now I'm just curious as to how it measures up. Thanks for the feedback.
|
| Posted: 8/16/2004 1:29:57 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives