![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Help me choose between these two |
![]() |
| P: 5/12/2004 11:13:15 AM | |
ecarrot Rough Rock Total Posts: 2 Last Post: 5/21/2004 Member Since: 5/12/2004 |
Which one of these do you guys think is better? 1) AGS Report Shape: Round Brilliant Measurements: 6.48 - 6.50 x 4.03 Cut: AGS 000 Color: G Clarity: VS1 Carat: 1.038 Depth%: 62.1 Table%: 55 Crown angle: 34.5 Pavillion angle: 40.8 Girdle: 1.4%-2.2% Culet: Pointed Comments: Fluorescence: Neligible Additional clouds are not shown. HCA Score: 1.3 Light Return (Excellent) Fire (Excellent) Scintillation (Excellent) Spread (Very Good) 2) AGS Report Shape: Round Brilliant Measurements: 6.52 - 6.55 x 4.02 Cut: AGS 000 Color: G Clarity: VS1 Carat: 1.050 Depth%: 61.6 Table%: 57 Crown angle: 34.4 Pavillion angle: 40.9 Girdle: 1.4%-2.1% Culet: Pointed Comments: Fluorescence: Neligible Pinpoints are not shown. HCA Score: 1.6 Light Return (Excellent) Fire (Excellent) Scintillation (Very Good) Spread (Very Good) The price for the two is about the same. Should I be concerned about the "Additional clouds are not shown" comment on the first rock? Thanks
|
| Posted: 5/12/2004 11:13:15 AM | |
![]() |
There are 2 replies to this message. There are 2 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 5/12/2004 11:28:54 AM | |
|
bling Cut Rock Total Posts: 487 Last Post: 5/17/2005 Member Since: 4/17/2003 |
they both look like good stones...the first one is a tad deep, but not bad at all...maybe smidge smaller in diameter for a 1.03. numbers look good for #2. honestly, i think you can go with either...have you considered going down in clarity a bit..maybe a vs2? good luck!
|
| Posted: 5/12/2004 11:28:54 AM | |
| P: 5/12/2004 11:41:23 AM | |
|
Magnum Cut Rock Total Posts: 342 Last Post: 7/28/2004 Member Since: 3/26/2004 |
---------------- Probably not. It's usually just a secondary type incluson, and being a VS1, the stone should be eye-clean. If you still have doubts, ask the vendor to describe the inclusions on the stone. As far as which one I'd pick, it's pretty much a coin flip, but just on the numbers I'd probably lean towards number 1. The first stone has a little better table percentage and pavilion angle, while the second one has a slightly larger diameter. can the vendor provide any other additional info, like maybe idealscope and H&A pictures? If not, maybe you can ask the vendor his/her opinion, or have both stones sent to a trusted independent appraiser. best of luck in your search.
|
| Posted: 5/12/2004 11:41:23 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives