![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Question for RHINO - What are the percentage of stones that scores... |
![]() |
| P: 5/1/2004 3:23:12 PM | |
|
Dancing Fire Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,218 Last Post: 11/21/2009 Member Since: 4/3/2004 |
triple very high on the Bscope? Does all of these triple very high score always do well with the ISEE2 machine and vice versa?
it is always harder to find a "mind clean" stone than a eye clean stone. |
| Posted: 5/1/2004 3:23:12 PM | |
![]() |
There are 6 replies to this message. There are 6 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 5/1/2004 6:06:36 PM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Not excatly whom you asked, but the issue got some discussion and feedback already - if you find time to search 'Rhono's' posts for "Isee2". On one thread in particluar (about which instument is preferable for ranking briliance) ISee2 was mentioned as the most demanding test. The Bscope does not take into account symetry (only via it's impact on brilliance) while Isee2 does - so a stone with so-so symmetry but great light return would get 'degraded' by Isee2. The 'imperfect' H&A would make good examples in this category. Otherwise, the b-scores are highly correlated (not to say about the same) with the corresponding Isee scores: at least among the couple dozen stones in Jonathan's "educational diamonds" collection. Jonathan's picks usually get Isee scores above 9 - a pretty lofty neighbourhood already. Max is 9.8... Non-H&As would get 5-6 'cause of symmetry alone. Hope this helps.... Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 5/1/2004 6:06:36 PM | |
| P: 5/1/2004 8:09:37 PM | |
|
Magnum Cut Rock Total Posts: 342 Last Post: 7/28/2004 Member Since: 3/26/2004 |
The brilliancescope measures a stone's performance in direct light conditions, while the ISEE2 measures a stone's performance in diffuse light conditions. While exceptionally cut stones will tend to do extremely well on both machines, it is not a hard and fast rule. I think Rhino has said there's a little better chance that a stone that does extrememly well on the ISEE2 will do extremely well on the BS, than a stone that does extremely well on the BS doing extremely well on the ISEE2, partially due to the symmetry that the ISEE2 measures, which is I think why Rhino has said that if he had to pick between the two machines, he would slightly favor the ISEE2 machine.. To answer your question more simply, no, a stone that scores VH/VH/VH on the brilliancescope will not always score extremely high on the ISEE2 and vice versa. A lot of times, but not always.
|
| Posted: 5/1/2004 8:09:37 PM | |
| P: 5/1/2004 11:46:12 PM | |
|
Rhino Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,865 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 3/29/2001 |
Rhino |
| Posted: 5/1/2004 11:46:12 PM | |
| P: 5/2/2004 11:36:52 AM | |
|
valeria101 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 14,048 Last Post: 4/30/2006 Member Since: 8/29/2003 |
Sorry I jumped in, I should have waited ![]() especially since the dsired answer seems to contain a scare: - the mention of H&A stones with less than great brilliance! Taking it by points: #1 (true or false) the H&A pattern promisses both superior symmetry and the right proportions for good light return (since those harts and arrows are formed by reflections inside the stone, the same factor that determines the components of light return). #2 (true or false) some dude of a diamond can have great symmetry - all you need are the wrong proportions cut with great precision. ------------------------------------ So... Can the H&A pattern still be formed 'correctly' with prportions not consistent with the requirement for good brilliance ( as I try to grasp this, in those stones with better total Isee2 score 'cause of symmetry and low Bscope ' cause of wrong proportions ). [if this is downright stupid, I'm redy to give up , at last with the required appologies and commitment to take back and delete all simmilar ranting ] Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian] |
| Posted: 5/2/2004 11:36:52 AM | |
| P: 5/2/2004 3:29:57 PM | |
|
Dancing Fire Ideal Rock Total Posts: 10,218 Last Post: 11/21/2009 Member Since: 4/3/2004 |
---------------- Rhino, I'm sure you had a few that scores very high on both machines. Do you still have a sarin report on this type of stone that you can post? Just curious what the numbers look like. it is always harder to find a "mind clean" stone than a eye clean stone. |
| Posted: 5/2/2004 3:29:57 PM | |
| P: 5/2/2004 4:10:41 PM | |
|
Rhino Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,865 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 3/29/2001 |
Hi Vtigger,
I am sorry but your answer can not be provided with basic Sarin measurements. Take for example these 2 stones. Both are *very similar* crown/pavilion/table data. Stone #1 here has 34.2 crown angles, 40.7 pavilion angles and 55% table. Stone #2 has 34.4 crown angles, 40.8 pavilion angles and 55.8% table. Both stones would score similar HCA scores and both of these happen to BOTH be H&A diamonds in what I would consider the most cherry combination of proportions (55-56 tables, crown angles between 34-34.5, pavilion angles between 40.7-40.9) continued...
![]() ![]() So while both of these diamonds have very similar proportions both H&A stones have very different optics.
Here are LightScope results on both. One displays more pale reds than the other while the other shows a greater saturation of dark reds throughout the stone and especially in the most important location ... under the table. This information can not be assessed with the basic Sarin. Important data such as the variances, twist, lower girdle facets, star facets and upper girdles must also be known. It is interesting how 2 diamonds with very similar Sarin dimensions can get such varying optical results but now you might realize why I do not rely on Sarin information alone when we make our purchasing decisions.
![]() ![]() Obviously the stone on the left has the lower optical results. (low) High in white light, Very High in colored light return and high in scintillation. If memory serves me right this one got somewhere between an 8.9 - 9.1 via Isee2. The stone on the right is a triple VH via B'scope and a 9.8 Isee2. It's optical design is 2nd to none in the realm of H&A cuts and is the best that we get to examine in our lab. I've tried to duplicate these images with an IdealScope and a FireScope but so far can only do so with our LightScope as it shows the most intense level of detail among the red reflectors I've tried. I can't link you to these individual stones here on the forum but if you'd like to see the rest of the details drop me an email.
Kind regards,
Rhino |
| Posted: 5/2/2004 4:10:41 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives