|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » Need feedback on diamond price
|
|
 |
Need feedback on diamond price |
 |
| P: 4/25/2004 1:21:41 AM | |
worldhistory Rough Rock Total Posts: 3 Last Post: 4/25/2004 Member Since: 4/25/2004 |
This is my first time posting so hope it works! I have been shopping for an e-ring for the last couple weeks. I have learned a great deal and believe I found a good deal, but would like some feedback before anything is final. Here are the specs: GIA cetified .85 (Round Ideal) VS2 H Polish = VG Sym = G Depth = 63% Table = 59% Cutlet and Flur = NONE 5.97 x 3.75 mm Girdle = MED - THK COST = $2900 Thanks for the help!
|
| Posted: 4/25/2004 1:21:41 AM | |
|
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 4/25/2004 4:22:50 PM | |
b.jpg)
phoenixgirl Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,496 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 3/20/2003 |
Other similar stones on PriceScope are going for between $2778 and $3765, so your price seems quite in line. My only question is the 63% depth. A stone with a depth of more like 60 or 61% will look bigger and is morely to be well cut. Have you seen the stone in person? How does it sparkle compared to other stones?
|
| Posted: 4/25/2004 4:22:50 PM | |
| P: 4/25/2004 4:31:27 PM | |
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
Worldhistory, how do you know it is ideal cut? 0.85ct ideal cut with 59% table would have diameter close to 6.17mm, not 5.97mm. 63% total depth is rather deep for ideal cut stone. Pricescope |
| Posted: 4/25/2004 4:31:27 PM | |
| P: 4/25/2004 5:09:24 PM | |
|
worldhistory Rough Rock Total Posts: 3 Last Post: 4/25/2004 Member Since: 4/25/2004 |
Looking back at my info I guess I dont know if it is ideal cut. The Report says "Round Brilliant". When I began my search for the perfect e-ring I was hoping to keep it under $3000. Mostly I had been seeing VS1 and G or better, but the largest certified stone with this criteria, I could really afford was about .60. I have seen the .85 mentioned above and it sparkles a great deal. I am worried that I got caught up in the size of the diamond and perhaps lost sight of my original goal (quality over quantity). Thoughts?
|
| Posted: 4/25/2004 5:09:24 PM | |
| P: 4/25/2004 6:37:46 PM | |
Rhino Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,865 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 3/29/2001 |
I think your last post hit the nail on the head. You got blindsighted by the carat/clarity/color and disregarded how this diamond is actually going to *appear*. This is common when you're not actually looking at the diamonds but just numbers on a screen. A 63% depth does not sound promising and at the diameter (5.97mm) you can get a much better proportioned diamond in the .7xct range with the same circumference.
Rhino |
| Posted: 4/25/2004 6:37:46 PM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
