![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Diamonds at Amazon.com |
![]() |
| P: 4/23/2004 6:16:24 PM | |
|
Pricescope Administrator Total Posts: 8,265 Last Post: 1/5/2008 Member Since: 1/1/2000 |
Have you guys seen an announcement at Amazon? I checked a few options diamond engagement rings. Selected 1 carat round diamond, H SI2 good cut with 14K gold solitaire (about $100) for $3,455. Go to description. It says: Minimum Carat total weight: 0.95 carats Certificate type: IGI Setting: 4-prong classic-solitaire-style Stone shape: round-brilliant-cut Minimum color: H Minimum clarity: SI2 Cut: good-cut As you can see parameters are not exact and instead of 1 ct stone you can get 0.95 ct with IGI report. No information on proportions, measurements, polish and symmetry. Did a Pricescope search for 0.95 - 0.99 carat H SI2. Prices starts from $2,251 for 0.95 EGL graded stone up to $4,000 for 0.99 GIA or AGS graded stones. Another option: 1ct, G VS2, ideal cut for $5,560. On description page they specify IGI and AGS reports. Minimum weight is 0.95 ct again. Cut described as following: ----- I didn’t find any AGS ideal diamonds in 0.95 – 0.99 ct range on PS. 1.0 ct AGS or GIA ex/ex start from $5,000 and up to $6,200 for H&A It would be interesting if someone would buy a diamond from Amazon it and get the real grades. Pricescope |
| Posted: 4/23/2004 6:16:24 PM | |
![]() |
There are 2 replies to this message. There are 2 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 4/23/2004 9:17:01 PM | |
Mark Turnowski Rough Rock Total Posts: 18 Last Post: 3/19/2005 Member Since: 10/15/2003 |
Having recently visited the Amazon site I find it extremely interesting that they would list their diamonds with the wrong weights attached. It seems that Amazon has a specific margin requirement built into their costs and the only way they can justify their prices is list a diamond that weighs .95pts. as a 1.00ct. In addition where/what are the specs. I think they owe it the the public to list as much information as possible. Perhaps they believe that the public will assume that because it originates from amazon it must be priced well. I think the majority of us will see thru that.
Mark Turnowski, GG |
| Posted: 4/23/2004 9:17:01 PM | |
| P: 4/23/2004 10:08:22 PM | |
|
Mara Ideal Rock Total Posts: 27,912 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 10/30/2002 |
I believe Blue Nile and some other online sites do that as well for things like earrings. 1ctw and it lists something like "min weight at .98". Interesting considering that people just think they want that magic carat weight, and aren't even realizing that if the stones were really .50c or over, they'd pay an inflated rate. However the pricing is inflated enough to LOOK like 1ctw pricing when they are really getting something just shy and therefore much cheaper should they buy separate. It's a tricky game!
________________________________ |
| Posted: 4/23/2004 10:08:22 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives