|
|
|
|
| ||
Diamond Jewelry Forums
 Picture Gallery
 Video Gallery
 Journal
|
|||
|
|  Search
|  Posted Today
|  Most Active
|  Help
|
||
 »
Home
»  » Diamond Prices and Grading »
 » RockyTalky
»  » Input pls!!!!
|
|
 |
Input pls!!!! |
 |
| P: 4/23/2004 3:06:22 AM | |
dorothysoos Rough Rock Total Posts: 14 Last Post: 5/25/2004 Member Since: 3/3/2004 |
I've posted a pair of diamonds recently for input but was sold before I got to it.So now I've to start my search all over again.Any advice or imput would be greatly appreciated. Diamond 1 AGS ideal Measurement 6.78x6.81x4.15 Fsi1 1.156 carat Polish I Sym I Pro I Colour Fsi1 1.146 carat Table 56% Depth 61% crown A 34.5 % 15.1 Pav A 40.9 % 43.1 Faceted 0.7 to 1.2 HCA 1.5 Ex Diamond 2 AGS Ideal Measurement 6.80x6.84x4.16 Table 56% Depth 61% Polish I Sym I Pro Crown A 35.3 % 15.7 Pav A 41.0 % 43.1% Faceted 07 to 1.0% HCA 3.1 Vg(is this good ????) Diamond 3 GIA Fsi1 1.16 carat measurement 6.77x6.81x4.14 Table 56.3% Depth 60.9% CrownA 34.5 %15.0 Pav A 40.6 % 42.5 Culet 1.2 girdle 0.9 to 1.2 HCA 0.7 ex I need to choose a pair and any help wouuld be greatThanks |
| Posted: 4/23/2004 3:06:22 AM | |
|
There are 4 replies to this message. There are 4 replies on this page. |
|
| P: 4/23/2004 3:32:32 AM | |
Magnum Cut Rock Total Posts: 342 Last Post: 7/28/2004 Member Since: 3/26/2004 |
Out of the three you listed, and the information provided, I would choose numbers 1 and 3. Number 2 has a slightly deep pavilion combined with a relatively steep crown, which is getting close to the steep-deep combination that can result in more light leakage and less light return than a more ideally cut stone. Thus the slightly worse HCA score. There's a chance number 2 is a beautiful stone, but by looking only at the numbers, it is a lot less likely a beatufiul stone than say, numbers one and two, which have a better chance of being great performers as far as light return goes.
|
| Posted: 4/23/2004 3:32:32 AM | |
| P: 4/23/2004 4:18:57 AM | |
aljdewey Ideal Rock Total Posts: 8,236 Last Post: 2/11/2008 Member Since: 11/25/2002 |
Ditto what Magnum said - as long as these diamonds perform as the numbers suggest they should, I'd select #1 and #3. #2 may still be a beautiful diamond, but it has the potential for some light leakage given the steep/deep proportion on the crown/pav angles.
Have you seen any of these?
_____________________ |
| Posted: 4/23/2004 4:18:57 AM | |
| P: 4/23/2004 7:30:08 AM | |
|
dorothysoos Rough Rock Total Posts: 14 Last Post: 5/25/2004 Member Since: 3/3/2004 |
---------------- Thanks for all yr info.No i have not seen any of these diamonds and I won't be seeing it till its shipped to me.How do I get it independently appraisal and mounted and then shipped to me??.I hope there is no margin for error cos' its shipped half around the world to get to me and I will be in loads of trouble if ...Thanks again.
|
| Posted: 4/23/2004 7:30:08 AM | |
| P: 4/23/2004 9:39:08 AM | |
Giangi Ideal Rock Total Posts: 2,530 Last Post: 10/29/2006 Member Since: 1/23/2003 |
I, too, would choose #1 and #3. They are both extremely close in terms of proportions and, most important, diameters. F/SI 1 is always nice too.  Just make sure they are pretty much eye-clean from the top. I wouldn't consider stone #2 --as others have suggested, it's likely to be a steep/deep combo with some leakage.
_____________ |
| Posted: 4/23/2004 9:39:08 AM | |
 Previous Page
|
Next Page 
|
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
| |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives
