![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Went to a B&M Store - Now I have questions! |
![]() |
| P: 7/13/2009 12:45:26 AM | |
Joe241 Rough Rock Total Posts: 14 Last Post: 8/2/2009 Member Since: 7/6/2009 |
I went to look at diamonds at a B&M store on Friday and after I mentioned that I was looking for diamonds online the salesman got defensive pretty fast. He throw a bunch of arguments at me against buying online (most of which I already knew were b.s.) but I've got a few questions based on what he said. He told me that his store gets first crack at the diamonds, so the ones you see online are all diamonds the B&M store rejected. Is there any truth to this? He also showed me a couple diamonds and their respective AGS reports. I noticed the AGS reports had different formats then the reports on WF do. Also WF seems to have more then 1 AGS report format. Can someone explain why there are all these different formats for AGS reports? |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 12:45:26 AM | |
![]() |
There are 8 replies to this message. There are 8 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 7/13/2009 2:29:08 AM | |
|
Regular Guy Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,315 Last Post: 11/20/2009 Member Since: 7/7/2004 |
Hi, Joe, and welcome to Pricescope... Re your second paragraph, and first crack...I think you'll find the distribution system is set up such that not all channels do lead to internet vendors, so it's not a question of first crack, but I think some vendors get a "crack" at diamonds unavailable for you to view on this site, under the various search options. So, they do have more options you might not be able to see if you were just doing your own homework. Also, some vendors may have access that other vendors don't, based on their particular relationships. But...I don't think by and large internet vendors are viewed in a distribution as "second rate," and there fore only get second tier options available to them... Re your second point, the problem if is is one is probably AGS changing their presentation of certs with some frequency...and it is hard to keep up. The most recent presentation in the FAQ section on this board is not current any longer, as reviewed here (my third post down), and even more recently, a new category of cert has arisen from them...gold, reviewed here. Ira (Ruffles have Ridges) Z. |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 2:29:08 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 3:42:30 AM | |
|
Lorelei Ideal Rock Total Posts: 34,212 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 4/30/2005 |
Date: 7/13/2009 12:45:26 AM
Author:Joe241 I went to look at diamonds at a B&M store on Friday and after I mentioned that I was looking for diamonds online the salesman got defensive pretty fast. He throw a bunch of arguments at me against buying online (most of which I already knew were b.s.) but I've got a few questions based on what he said. He told me that his store gets first crack at the diamonds, so the ones you see online are all diamonds the B&M store rejected. Is there any truth to this? No. He also showed me a couple diamonds and their respective AGS reports. I noticed the AGS reports had different formats then the reports on WF do. Also WF seems to have more then 1 AGS report format. Can someone explain why there are all these different formats for AGS reports? Ditto Ira, AGS have recently changed report formats to the Platinum Report which replaces the old Diamond Quality Document and the Gold Report for the Diamond Quality Report. ![]() Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be... - Stephanie M Thorn |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 3:42:30 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 5:52:27 AM | |
Stone-cold11 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 6,867 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 9/9/2008 |
The DQD and DQR format is still available by request, so you will still see only report style at the moment, especially on BN.
|
| Posted: 7/13/2009 5:52:27 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 11:03:10 AM | |
|
denverappraiser Ideal Rock Total Posts: 4,614 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 7/21/2004 |
Diamonds have several different distribution channels but the largest at the moment is what they call ‘memorandum’. This is effectively a virtual consignment deal where a shopper requests a stone, the jeweler calls up their favorite vendor who ships them a few stones on consignment that seem to meet the requirements and the jeweler schedules an appointment for a presentation and an attempt to make a sale. If all goes well they pay the bill and keep their cut and if it doesn’t go well they return the stone(s) to the vendor who will wait for some other customer somewhere else and will try the whole thing again. The internet has made this a very efficient system and the jewelers, as well as you, can look at lists of stones available from various suppliers and can order them without actually needing to speak to a human. There are sites with tens of thousands of stones available this way even though they have no actual inventory at all. It’s also the reason that you’ll see the same stone listed by several different suppliers in the big search databases like the one here. One of the unintended consequences of this is that everyone is sharing much of the same inventory and it tends to drive the quality down to the lowest common denominator along with the price. The solution for jewelers (and online dealers) who don’t want to sell generic goods for rock bottom prices is to actually buy the stones that are most suitable for their own customers. It not only makes the vendors happy, which may result in better pricing or better offers next time, it prevents competitors from having access to that particular stone. I’m guessing this is what he means by them getting first ‘crack’ at the stones. They could have bought them for inventory but didn’t. This is a bit misleading because every other jeweler on the planet, including those online folks, also had first crack and, presumably, all have declined for whatever reason. This doesn’t make it a bad stone, or overpriced, or anything else. It might be, but then the one your jeweler is selling might be too. Not every customer and not every store is looking for the same things and what you might consider a problem (big, crappy cut, cheap) might be just exactly what someone else is looking for. The solution is to evaluate each stone on it’s own merits and each dealer on theirs. If you need help, the forum here is full of folks who are happy to dive in and an increasing number of communities have independent appraisers who can look at things and give you a professional opinion that’s free of commercial spin. Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA Professional Appraisals in Denver There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile. |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 11:03:10 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 11:14:14 AM | |
|
neatfreak Ideal Rock Total Posts: 13,450 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 2/17/2007 |
Ohh I hate it when they use BS sales tactics to try and make a sale.
|
| Posted: 7/13/2009 11:14:14 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 1:46:59 PM | |
whatmeworry Ideal Rock Total Posts: 855 Last Post: 8/30/2009 Member Since: 5/24/2006 |
Date: 7/13/2009 11:03:10 AM Author: denverappraiser Diamonds have several different distribution channels but the largest at the moment is what they call ‘memorandum’. This is effectively a virtual consignment deal where a shopper requests a stone, the jeweler calls up their favorite vendor who ships them a few stones on consignment that seem to meet the requirements and the jeweler schedules an appointment for a presentation and an attempt to make a sale. If all goes well they pay the bill and keep their cut and if it doesn’t go well they return the stone(s) to the vendor who will wait for some other customer somewhere else and will try the whole thing again. The internet has made this a very efficient system and the jewelers, as well as you, can look at lists of stones available from various suppliers and can order them without actually needing to speak to a human. There are sites with tens of thousands of stones available this way even though they have no actual inventory at all. It’s also the reason that you’ll see the same stone listed by several different suppliers in the big search databases like the one here. One of the unintended consequences of this is that everyone is sharing much of the same inventory and it tends to drive the quality down to the lowest common denominator along with the price. The solution for jewelers (and online dealers) who don’t want to sell generic goods for rock bottom prices is to actually buy the stones that are most suitable for their own customers. It not only makes the vendors happy, which may result in better pricing or better offers next time, it prevents competitors from having access to that particular stone. I’m guessing this is what he means by them getting first ‘crack’ at the stones. They could have bought them for inventory but didn’t. This is a bit misleading because every other jeweler on the planet, including those online folks, also had first crack and, presumably, all have declined for whatever reason. This doesn’t make it a bad stone, or overpriced, or anything else. It might be, but then the one your jeweler is selling might be too. Not every customer and not every store is looking for the same things and what you might consider a problem (big, crappy cut, cheap) might be just exactly what someone else is looking for. The solution is to evaluate each stone on it’s own merits and each dealer on theirs. If you need help, the forum here is full of folks who are happy to dive in and an increasing number of communities have independent appraisers who can look at things and give you a professional opinion that’s free of commercial spin. Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA Professional Appraisals in Denver Neil, I wonder if you could talk more about quaility going down. I'm don't understand why that would be the case.
|
| Posted: 7/13/2009 1:46:59 PM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 2:10:47 PM | |
|
swingirl Ideal Rock Total Posts: 3,283 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 4/6/2006 |
There are good and bad B&M stores and good and bad internet vendors. Then there are places like Good Old Good that have a retail store AND do internet business. Most of my favorite internet vendors have an office or store where they meet with customers. But since I can't take a trip to NY and Texas and Idaho every time I want jewelry, I'd rather develop a relationships with vendors who have websites that list their products, show many photos and magnifications and offer great phone support. I don't mind returning something if it isn't exactly what I want. There certainly are B&M stores that carry beautiful inventory but I am not worried about finding fabulous first rate jewelry and stones on the internet. Most of us get weird looks from B&Ms if we ask for an ASETs or Idealscope images. They rarely have any photography capabilities. Stick around PS long enough, read enough threads and you'll get a more comfortable with the internet vendors that post here.
|
| Posted: 7/13/2009 2:10:47 PM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 3:59:26 PM | |
|
dreamer_dachsie Ideal Rock Total Posts: 5,538 Last Post: 11/23/2009 Member Since: 12/16/2007 |
The rep is lying flat out. He may believe that to be the case but he is wrong. As just one example, WF and BGD carry branded super-ideal cut diamonds that are *never* available to B&Ms Hardly cast offs. Others have explained other evidence to the contrary as well. A sales person who lied so blatantly about the diamond industry in order to scare me would never get my business! I hate that kind of b.s. *** Dreamer *** |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 3:59:26 PM | |
|
|
Next Page |
| « Engagement Ring « | » Help me choose! » |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives