![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
Experts, Please critique this diamond! |
![]() |
| P: 7/12/2009 11:32:36 PM | |
OnInTwo Rough Rock Total Posts: 14 Last Post: 7/16/2009 Member Since: 7/5/2009 |
Good evening PS'ers! Could you please provide your thoughts on the following? 1.513 ct G SI1 AGS Light performance 0, polish and symmetry 0, fluoroesence Neg. 7.29-7.36 x 4.54mm Table 56.7 Depth 61.9 Crown Angle 35.4 Pav Angle 40.6 Star 52 Lower Girdle 80 Thin to slightly thick, pointed I looked at it through ASET scope just holding the diamond with tweezers. It appeared like a good image. Unfortunately, even after reading the tutorials suggested here, it's still challenging to know if what I'm looking at is acceptable. The AGS computer generated Light Performance image on the DQD looks excellent. Is this an acceptable image? Or should I be concerned because it's computer generated? Also, will this diamond look "big" in a 5.5 platinum solitaire setting? Thanks!! |
| Posted: 7/12/2009 11:32:36 PM | |
![]() |
There are 6 replies to this message. There are 6 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 7/13/2009 2:41:12 AM | |
|
strmrdr Ideal Rock Total Posts: 23,296 Last Post: 10/9/2009 Member Since: 11/1/2003 |
compare the image you saw to the AGS image are they pretty close? The actual image trumps the AGS generated image. The numbers are excellent should be a very fiery diamond. Yes it will look big unless you live someplace where 2ct+ is the norm which isn't very many places. ........... Karl has joined the diamond trade and is now posting as Karl_K |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 2:41:12 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 3:40:42 AM | |
|
Lorelei Ideal Rock Total Posts: 34,212 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 4/30/2005 |
Date: 7/13/2009 2:41:12 AM Author: strmrdr compare the image you saw to the AGS image are they pretty close? The actual image trumps the AGS generated image. The numbers are excellent should be a very fiery diamond. Yes it will look big unless you live someplace where 2ct+ is the norm which isn't very many places. Ditto ![]() Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be... - Stephanie M Thorn |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 3:40:42 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 8:57:27 AM | |
OnInTwo Rough Rock Total Posts: 14 Last Post: 7/16/2009 Member Since: 7/5/2009 |
Thanks for your kind responses. In your opinion, would this 1.513 ct look just as big (and good) set in platinum solitaire as a 1.8ct? I was shooting for 1.7ct-2.0 ct range. I found this 1.513 and it's unbelievable! I just want to make sure it'll look "big" enough and it'll catch people's eyes when she wears it!
|
| Posted: 7/13/2009 8:57:27 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 9:04:51 AM | |
|
Ellen Ideal Rock Total Posts: 22,894 Last Post: 11/6/2009 Member Since: 1/13/2006 |
Date: 7/13/2009 8:57:27 AM Yes. Once you get to 1 ct., it takes much bigger jumps in carat weight to make a real visual difference. It will look very nice. Author: OnInTwo Thanks for your kind responses. In your opinion, would this 1.513 ct look just as big (and good) set in platinum solitaire as a 1.8ct? I was shooting for 1.7ct-2.0 ct range. I found this 1.513 and it's unbelievable! I just want to make sure it'll look 'big' enough and it'll catch people's eyes when she wears it!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 9:04:51 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 9:07:11 AM | |
Stone-cold11 Ideal Rock Total Posts: 6,849 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 9/9/2008 |
A 1.5c is about a 7.3-7.4mm, a 1.8c is about a 7.8-7.9mm.
|
| Posted: 7/13/2009 9:07:11 AM | |
| P: 7/13/2009 10:08:42 AM | |
|
Lorelei Ideal Rock Total Posts: 34,212 Last Post: 11/22/2009 Member Since: 4/30/2005 |
Date: 7/13/2009 9:04:51 AM Author: Ellen Date: 7/13/2009 8:57:27 AM Yes. Once you get to 1 ct., it takes much bigger jumps in carat weight to make a real visual difference. It will look very nice. Author: OnInTwo Thanks for your kind responses. In your opinion, would this 1.513 ct look just as big (and good) set in platinum solitaire as a 1.8ct? I was shooting for 1.7ct-2.0 ct range. I found this 1.513 and it's unbelievable! I just want to make sure it'll look 'big' enough and it'll catch people's eyes when she wears it! ![]() ditto Ellen. ![]() Nothing is more sacred as the bond between horse and rider...no other creature can ever become so emotionally close to a human as a horse. When a horse dies, the memory lives on because an enormous part of his owner's heart, soul, very existence dies also...but that can never be laid to rest, it is not meant to be... - Stephanie M Thorn |
| Posted: 7/13/2009 10:08:42 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
| « 1.5 RB recommendations - paging Lorelie « | » What do I do after purchase? » |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives