Engagement Rings Direct
 

Diamond Jewelry Forums   Picture Gallery   Video Gallery   Journal

   
 Search Posted Today Most Active Help   
 » Home »  » Diamond Prices and Grading »  » RockyTalky »  » Is this a good stone at a good price?


  

 Is this a good stone at a good price?

P:  1/18/2004 3:19:38 PM  
Demelza
Demelza

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,850
Last Post: 12/12/2008
Member Since: 1/18/2004
 
Hi,

This is my first time posting here. I am in the market for an emerald cut diamond somewhere in the 1-1.5 carat range. It's so much more difficult to assess an emerald cut diamond than it is a round brilliant. I need all the help I can get. I came across this one on Whiteflash. The price seems excellent! Is it too good to be true? Any thoughts? Thanks a lot!!!

http://www.whiteflash.com/emerald/Emerald-cut-diamond-564227.htm#
Posted:  1/18/2004 3:19:38 PM

 There are 8 replies to this message.  There are 8 replies on this page.

P: 1/18/2004 4:46:05 PM
diamondsman
diamondsman

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 625
Last Post: 11/12/2009
Member Since: 11/11/2002
 
The stone seems to be very nicely cut from the measurments, as it has a rtio of 1.49:1 which is nice in emerald cut.
It would be on the long side which is what most people like,but it really all depends on your preferences.

As far as price is concerened it is not bad, but I suggest you search a little more and compare before you make your decision.

Diamondsman

buydiamonddirect.com

Posted:  1/18/2004 4:46:05 PM
P: 1/18/2004 5:50:48 PM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 
The AGA standards would be the only reference I know available for evaluating the cut of an EC. Personally, I believe that your own taste is the best guide for these. I like the reasonable depth of your stone, the well balanced choice of color and clarity and, of course, the price. What I may have doubts about is the large table: some like this look, but it is arguably a good promise for the stone to look transparent rather than fiery. One rule of thumb often mentioned around here is that the table% should be less than the depth%.

The price is among the lowest around, but not a complete knock-out. Look at this contender, for example. With a 1.37 LxW ratio is not as slender as your choice though... This example is just meant to show that there are alternatives in the same price range for the color and clarity you have chosen.

Your choice? It is a good stone and it is very hard to tell what is the best of an EC as long as light return is not a concern. I do like VG symmetry in these: the "good" grade is looser for fancy cuts than for rounds, and occasionally a step cut stone would show exactly what this means.

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  1/18/2004 5:50:48 PM
P: 1/18/2004 5:51:03 PM
Giangi
Giangi

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 2,530
Last Post: 10/29/2006
Member Since: 1/23/2003
 
Usually I prefer emeralds with depths greater than the table, but that doesn't mean it could be quite attractive. I would make sure via Sarin or OGI that its crown height is >11%. I would ask for an idealscope image too.

_____________
Omnia Mea Mecum Porto.

Giangi

Posted:  1/18/2004 5:51:03 PM
P: 1/18/2004 6:24:19 PM
Demelza
Demelza

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,850
Last Post: 12/12/2008
Member Since: 1/18/2004
 
Thanks guys. This is all very helpful. I'm kind of lost when it comes to emerald cuts. I think I tend to like a ratio of at least 1:45:1. Otherwise it seems like they loose their elegant rectangle shape. If there is such a thing, does anyone know the "ideal" ranges for depth and table for emerald cuts? I've seen some stones where there is a HUGE difference between the table and depth percentages. Is this necessarily a bad thing? Thanks again for the advice. I love to learn about this stuff.

Posted:  1/18/2004 6:24:19 PM
P: 1/18/2004 6:33:51 PM
valeria101
valeria101

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 14,048
Last Post: 4/30/2006
Member Since: 8/29/2003
 
It really depends on what is good and what is bad for YOU. Surely you have seen These tables before... And despite the bad reputation as non-fiery cuts, ECs can achieve high light return, so you would be perfectly entytles to demand such performance. Usually a table samller than depth and rather higher table than most cut stones display are considered desirable (AGA standards do summarise the guidelines used in the industry). Light return is another story... the only step cuts with knowm light return I know of are either squares (at niceice, for example) or on the GoodOldGold site.

Aside or despite these criteria, really, it is up to you. After all, color, clarity, LxW ratio and symmetry plus table and depth already say a lot about the look of the stone. You may want to consider your choice of these factors fully (for ex. wether a large table is or not appealing to you, or wether good symmetry is good enough) and go for it.

Ana "The greatest experts are only as good as the sum total of what they have seen." [Souren Melikian]

Posted:  1/18/2004 6:33:51 PM
P: 1/18/2004 8:31:56 PM
Demelza
Demelza

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 1,850
Last Post: 12/12/2008
Member Since: 1/18/2004
 
What do you guys think about this diamond? It doesn't score really well on the white light return. What exactly does that mean in terms of performance? What do you think about the price? Thanks!! http://www.goodoldgold.com/emerald_1_08ct_f_vs1.htm

Posted:  1/18/2004 8:31:56 PM
P: 1/18/2004 8:49:31 PM
caratgirl
caratgirl

Ideal Rock
Total Posts: 634
Last Post: 12/22/2004
Member Since: 1/1/2003
 
Personal opinion? If this was a lower color (H-J) I would be more concerned. But with this cut, it looks like you are getting a high white color plus some rainbow colors, which are pretty rare amongst emerald cuts. Why don't you e-mail or call Jonathan and ask him? He will definitely give you the scoop on it.

Caratgirl
Just a Diamond Lover

Posted:  1/18/2004 8:49:31 PM
P: 1/19/2004 7:32:35 PM
ilh
ilh

Rough Rock
Total Posts: 3
Last Post: 1/19/2004
Member Since: 1/14/2004
 
Look at the chart at
gemappraisers. Note that the cut percents there don't guarantee performance measured by the light tests at goodoldgold.com.

Posted:  1/19/2004 7:32:35 PM

 Previous Page Next Page 
« Requesting Mara and others please.. «» david wolfe: any experience w/ this appraiser? »
Next Topics
Why do REAL diamonds display cz characteristic? Requesting Mara and others please.. A Question for the Diamond Experts regarding carbon crystals CHOICE of STONES how much does Fluorescence affect diamond quality Tough choice and out of time Jewelers in Ottawa area We finally picked our ring!!! Need help from Gemologists! does vatche x-prong go well with five stones band? Three stone ring question? Brilliant Scope and ISee2 Need help on these two stones.. I saw HOF stones Rainbow Colors in a Princess Cut if a diamond has exelent symmetry does this mean... New Sapphire/ Diamond Ring Soliciting Opinions on a Stone Narrowing it down.... Diamond Earrings in Toronto? Favorite B&M Sales Lingo? Facts about Wholesale Diamonds to the Public Scratches. opinions needed on this diamond Question for Dave Atlas & Rich Sherwood Please help with opinions on this emerald cut! Is this a good one? Question about Girdle? One more thing about the HOF store I went to yesterday Conflict Diamonds? Round w/ High Depth/Table should I avoid areas of inclusion when setting the diamond?

Jump to:



Contact Us  |  Back Home  |  Privacy Statement  |  Forum Agreement  |  Forum Policies

Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 Message forum software powered by  the Ideal BB

IdealBB Badge


Pricescope - Knowledge - Diamond Prices - Tools - Resources - About

© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives