![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
| Diamond Jewelry Forums
|
|||
|
| |
||
» Diamond Prices and Grading »
» RockyTalky
» |
|
![]() |
1.4 - HCA but 62.2% Depth? |
![]() |
| P: 1/16/2004 2:41:10 PM | |
sunset522 Rough Rock Total Posts: 52 Last Post: 5/20/2005 Member Since: 12/24/2003 |
Hello all: I really really appreciate all your help so far on my search for earrings.. Here is a stone that I'm looking at from one of the online vendors from pricescope.. and here are the specs for the stone:Ct.: 0.668 > Color: G > Clarity: SI1 > Measurements: 5.59-5.62x3.49mm > Depth: 62.2% > Table: 54% > Crown Angle: 33.9 > Pavilion Angle: 41.0 > Culet: Pointed > Girdle: Faceted 0.7% to 1.8% > Fluorescence: Negligible > Polish: Ideal > Symmetry: Ideal > Approximate price: $1,782.22 This stone scored 1.4 on HCA which means it's excellent.. however what do you think about the Depth? I know 62.2% is not considered great.. so please give me your expert input. Will the stone look smaller? Thanks!! Sandhya. |
| Posted: 1/16/2004 2:41:10 PM | |
![]() |
There are 7 replies to this message. There are 7 replies on this page. |
![]() |
| P: 1/16/2004 3:21:47 PM | |
niceice Ideal Rock Total Posts: 1,792 Last Post: 7/22/2008 Member Since: 1/29/2003 |
We'd pass on it... The total depth of 62.2% causes the outside diameter of the diamond to be less than it would be if the total depth were kept beneath 61.8% in other words, the diamond will "face up" smaller than comparable ideal cut diamonds of the same weight cut to a better total depth... That combined with the steeper pavilion angle would cause us to leave it by the side of the road...
Todd L. Gray, President |
| Posted: 1/16/2004 3:21:47 PM | |
| P: 1/16/2004 3:26:05 PM | |
|
Mara Ideal Rock Total Posts: 27,936 Last Post: 11/25/2009 Member Since: 10/30/2002 |
Sandya...per my emails I would definitely wait to see what other inventory vendors get in. If there is no rush, just hang tight.
BTW on that same note, was speaking with WhiteFlash today re: Greg's ACA and asked about their lack of inventory, they should have some new stones up soon but more in the carat weight. Seems that rough is more pricey and they have not been buying as much as usual. Also demand has been high, seemingly for most of the online vendors...possibly why all inventory levels on alot of Pscope vendors are low.
![]() ________________________________ |
| Posted: 1/16/2004 3:26:05 PM | |
| P: 1/16/2004 4:47:10 PM | |
|
skibum Rough Rock Total Posts: 42 Last Post: 9/28/2004 Member Since: 7/19/2003 |
Hi Robin and Todd Gray I've been lurking around here for a few months and after exhaustive research have made my purchase through one the vendors here on PS. I am a little surprised by your comment on the 62.2% depth. I have seen stones with this depth in your own inventory. I've noticed that you tend to criticize data and pictures that get posted here but I have not seen anybody post any of your pictures or even comment on their purchasing experience with you. You commented in a previous thread about the absence of decent h&a patterns, and were given an opportunity to show all of us what h&a are supposed to look like, and yet you did not rise to the challenge. I am still curious. Cheers, David Do good times ever end? |
| Posted: 1/16/2004 4:47:10 PM | |
| P: 1/16/2004 5:47:29 PM | |
|
Garry H (Cut Nut) Ideal Rock Total Posts: 11,586 Last Post: 11/25/2009 Member Since: 8/16/2000 |
I see nothing wrong with this stone. It has a small table and therefore when set you will see more diamond sticking out the top of the setting (vertical spread is greater). The width is 2% smaller than for a normal 57% Tolkowsky - not a train smash. As for the 41 degree pavilion it is perfectly compensated for by the lower crown angle. For every extra degree of pavilion depth you should subtract 5 degrees from the crown angle (5:1 ratio) Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT |
| Posted: 1/16/2004 5:47:29 PM | |
| P: 1/16/2004 6:29:31 PM | |
sunset522 Rough Rock Total Posts: 52 Last Post: 5/20/2005 Member Since: 12/24/2003 |
Cutnut, mara: Thanks for your advice.. I'll keep your suggestions in mind when I see the stone next week.. ![]() Sandhya.
|
| Posted: 1/16/2004 6:29:31 PM | |
| P: 1/17/2004 4:06:35 PM | |
|
mdx Ideal Rock Total Posts: 570 Last Post: 11/29/2007 Member Since: 3/1/2002 |
---------------- Gary I am glad you have brought this up again, Recently there have been a number of comments stating “ this angle is toooo steep and that angle is toooo shallow” without taking into consideration the possibility of compensating angles. Johan Melbourne Diamond Exchange Ltd Diamond Exchange Ltd. (Australia) |
| Posted: 1/17/2004 4:06:35 PM | |
| P: 1/18/2004 10:07:08 AM | |
fire&ice Ideal Rock Total Posts: 7,827 Last Post: 3/30/2009 Member Since: 7/22/2002 |
---------------- Just a novice here - but this is sane. I can not help but think it isn't one aspect of a stone that can make or break it - it's a combination of *lots* of stuff & the relationship between each.
|
| Posted: 1/18/2004 10:07:08 AM | |
|
|
Next Page |
Contact Us | Back Home | Privacy Statement | Forum Agreement | Forum Policies | |
| Ideal BB Version: 0.1.5.4.beta1 | Message forum software powered by the Ideal BB |
Pricescope -
Knowledge -
Diamond Prices -
Tools -
Resources -
About
© 2000-2009 Pricescope. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Disclaimer
forum archives