| Re: USPTO Issues Patent for Princess Cut Method Having H&A's |
|
|
|
cracks me up.... Would not be hard to beat that patent should it ever try to be enforced. 1> obvious 2> prior art |
| Re: USPTO Issues Patent for Princess Cut Method Having H&A's |
|
|
|
haha nothing.
Ever tried to rebut a patent. Even if the USPTO made a mistake (and clearly they do) then the patent owner can still enforce the patent with the law on their side. It makes life difficult for anyone they choose to attack. To overcome the patent (even if it is wrong) is very costly. What is even worse is if you believe you have a US patent that covers the new patent - even that is very difficult to prove and incredibly costly. That is called an "Inter Partes Reexamination". I have one running and can attest to the difficulties associated with patents.
Garry Holloway FGAA DipDT
HCA and Ideal-scope developer http://www.ideal-scope.com and http://www.HollowayDiamonds.com.au |
| Re: USPTO Issues Patent for Princess Cut Method Having H&A's |
|
|
|
Looks nearly identical to the Princess of Hearts and Brain Gavin's Quadex diamonds. Wonder if this will have any implications on them.
|