Rules for Clarity Grading
Click to view full-size image.
Related topics
|
|
|
|
by dimonbob » April 13th, 2003, 2:52 pm
Caratz
Good question, but no real good answers. I was once a diamond grader at GIA in Santa Monica so you would think I could answer that question. Some time later I worked for a wholesale diamond dealer where one of my duties was grading diamonds before we sent them to the GIA lab to be graded. We would send out 25 or 30 at a time. Did I second guess GIA right every time...not a chance, sometimes I was high othertimes I was low. Those "split" grades are hard to predict. Who was right? Who knows, but GIA has the power, and that makes me wrong. |
|
|
|
|
WIth the assumption made that the GIA is always correct, a legitimate and experienced grader will be able to mimic the GIA grading within a grade high or low over and over and over again. A two grade discrepancy would be very rare.
You have to keep in mind a few things. The GIA is a human enterprise and not divine. They do occasinally err. They just don't have to admit it like regular folks. A grader who, on average, calls the clarity grade correctly, is an okay grader. One who is usually too high or too low, needs experience, fine tuning and a supervisor with a better track record. It takes time to be a good, overall grader of clarity. Labs that consistently grade too high know what they are doing and intend to mislead the public. Their defense is the subjectivity of grading. While it is an excellent defense, it is not a completely honest one in every case. Diamonds are graded by people at this point in time. It is not a black and white subject in every respect. Thos who do an honest job are often confronted by those who look honest, but who really are not. A little trickery and loose grading goes a long way to increasing the profits on diamonds. David S. Atlas, GG(GIA) Sr Mbr(NAJA) ASG(AGA) My basket of services available to Pricescopers |
|
|
|
|
The answers so far remind me of Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's comment that went something like: "I cannot define what pornography is, but I know it when I see it."
It sounds like there is no real way to know where to draw the line between a VS1 or a VS2, but "you know it when you see it" . . . |