Question on clarity grading
Click to view full-size image.
Related topics
|
|
|
|
by Lorelei » November 10th, 2005, 1:56 am
A basic explanation of clarity grading is that the size, nature, colour and placements of inclusions are taken into account, visibility to the naked eye is subjective and opinions vary tremendously . If you do a search on clarity grading that will answer your question in much more detail. There are different definitions of eyeclean, often the trade's def is no visible inclusions to the naked eye at about 10 inches away in normal lighting, however the consumer's idea of this and comfort zone may be different. I can't answer for sure, it may be possible to see tiny inclusions in a VS1 up so close with good eyesight, but I don't really know. If it was a huge stone or a step cut then yes, but lets see what other answers you get. Hope this helps to start you off. Also check the FAQ section for the thread on definitions of eyeclean, that has some very informative things in there. Also I just checked an old thread for you, yes it is possible to see small inclusions up close with great vision in a VS1. If you are purchasing for yourself in the future, make sure the vendor you are working with understands your definition of eyeclean, if for example you don't want to see a thing up close then let them know that, it depends in your own comfort level. Some like a small unobtrusive inclusion, it serves as an instant identifier of their diamond.
|
|
|
|
|
The grades depend on the quantity of inclusions, not on how and when they are visible face up. And no, the grading is not done with the 'eye clean' quality in mind (or not just that at least) and certainly not from a distance. As much as I know, inclusions are identified at 10X magnification anyway. That's pretty close  Most of the 'eye clean' discussion regards SI stones... VS1? This must be the first one around here deemed non 'eye clean'. You guys must have been lucky - not!  Are the things you see in there also mentioned on the lab report? Your descriptions sounds pretty bad for VS1. Is that what you were seeing under magnification? |
This probably isn''t the norm however. I would think you would be pretty safe in a VS.
|
|
|
|
I didn''t say anything to her about the flaw nor did I get a chance to examine the GIA report thoroughly. I just assumed that a VS1 rating meant that no one would be able to see any flaw regardless of how close they held the stone.
It worried me because diamond with visible black spots are supposed to bring very bad luck to the wearer. |
|
|
|
|
No... I don''t think it is common. Wasn''t it ''Moremoremore''s VS2 cushion? Anyway, I haven''t seen one, let alone a bunch of specs in a VS1 yet. Even the colored inclusions are so darn small for the grade! And if there are several involved, each can only be even smaller ... It is hard to believe seeing multiple flecks in a VS1 without magnification. It sounds so exceptional that I wonder if the stone matched the cert  Just my 0.2. Anything could happen after all. |
|
|
|
|
Right on Ana!
 It was MMM''s cushion! It''s odd that some of the past threads say it can happen, especially in a 1 carat stone, I have a job to see a teeny carbon speck in my 1ct S12, but my eyes aren''t what they used to be! I would be upset if I splashed out on a VS1 and found inclusions waving cheerfully at me, I can understand in maybe a 3 ct or so but not in a 1
|
|
|
|
|
I haven''t heard that one! If you find a chance, it may help to look at clarity plot on the the lab report, clean the diamond and try to see if the flaws you can locate match the marks on the lab report. Easily visible black inclusions do not match ''VS1'' in my book. |