|
|
|
|
I'm really not sure what the deal is between Kretchmer and GAI with all this legal stuff (aside from that age old story of two partners who split ways, and therefore run competing businesses).
I would think, however, that if Kretchmer had any legit legal basis for going after GAI he would have - and GAI would have no choice but to change their product or quit selling it. GAI is doing business, and is not hiding their products, so I can't imagine there is any current legitimate legal issues. It also seems weird to me that Kretchmer would be able to trademark a concept that was actually created in Germany (I think). I can understand trademarking alloy blends - which he does - but GAI also uses some top secret alloy mixture (they wouldn't tell me what) so that their rings are also durable and can hold the tension. Yes, some of their rings are very similar - but isn't that like the Tiffany-style ring and every other company's version of it? Maybe Kretchmer is the Tiffany of the tension world - unfortunately I read some of the old archives on tension settings and saw a response or two from Kretchmer that were incredibly pompous, which turned me away from the Kretchmer line entirely. If Kretchmer was going to go after GAI shouldn't he also go after Neissing? They also sell tension rings that are similar to Kretchmer, and I believe they were doing it prior to Kretchmer (though I might be totally wrong about that). Anyway, there's my two cents... clearly I am a GAI girl! |
|
|
|
|
You''re right, the price difference is really quite significant... They do sell relatively different styles of settings, though, IMHO (and from the Kretchmers I''ve seen). |