shape
carat
color
clarity

HELP! I need a carat size chart for emerald cut?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

dashimurzi

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
37
Hi, do any of you know if a size chart exists for an emerald cut diamond that is specific (with uneven numbers).

Like "7 by 5" is a carat, "6.5 by 4.5" is .75 of a carat..how about "6.8 by 4.6" for example? or "6.9 by 4.7"?

thank you!!!!!
 

Skippy123

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
24,299
Date: 7/24/2009 11:46:43 PM
Author:dashimurzi
Hi, do any of you know if a size chart exists for an emerald cut diamond that is specific (with uneven numbers).

Like ''7 by 5'' is a carat, ''6.5 by 4.5'' is .75 of a carat..how about ''6.8 by 4.6'' for example? or ''6.9 by 4.7''?

thank you!!!!!
Hi Dashimurzi, how about this chart?
Carats_Stone_Conv.jpg
 

chrono

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
38,227
That''s a good reference chart, Skippy.

Of course it will change because the depth of emerald cuts are all over the place from 60% to 70% and up which means the stone will be smaller as depth increases, not to mention the ratio will change the LxW dimensions too.
 

Lorelei

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
42,064
Date: 7/25/2009 2:11:05 PM
Author: Chrono
That's a good reference chart, Skippy.

Of course it will change because the depth of emerald cuts are all over the place from 60% to 70% and up which means the stone will be smaller as depth increases, not to mention the ratio will change the LxW dimensions too.
Fancy shapes can hold weight in other ways not related to the depth unlike rounds, so doesn't always relate to face up spread/ size.

http://journal.pricescope.com/Articles/21/1/The-matter-of-depth-in-a-princess-cut.aspx
 

chrono

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
38,227
Date: 7/25/2009 2:17:30 PM
Author: Lorelei
Fancy shapes can hold weight in other ways not related to the depth unlike rounds, so doesn''t always relate to face up spread/ size.

http://journal.pricescope.com/Articles/21/1/The-matter-of-depth-in-a-princess-cut.aspx
For the true calculation for fancy stones, I calculate the surface area of the top of the diamond. I find that to be the most accurate representation of the perceived size of emerald cuts. So for emerald cuts, it is the LxW.
 

DiamanteBlu

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
2,501

Internally Flawless

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 25, 2009
Messages
3
A Emerald 1 ct. that measures 7 x 5 is a well cut stone. If the stone measures 7 x 5 and was a 1.20 ct. for instance the stone would too deep.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top