Good or Bad diamond

[Croton08]

I was just wondering if anyone could give me some advice on this diamond.


MegaScope Report
Weight 1.051
Diameter 6.60(6.66-6.63)
Total Depth %60.7
Crown Angle 34.3 (34.0-34.3)
Crown Height %14.6 (14.7-15.2)
Pav Angle 40.5 (40.1-41.0)
Pav Depth % 42.5 (42.0-43.0)
Culet %0.2
Table Size %54.8 (54.5-54.
Girdle %1.7 (1.2-2.2)

Proportion Very Good
Symmetry Very Good (0)


AGS Grade= Ideal 0
Color= 1.5 (G)
Clarity=5(SI1)

 

[Croton08]

Here is a upclose pic of diamond

Any advice or help??

 

[phoenixgirl]

It looks great! My advice is . . . buy it and enjoy!

 

[strmrdr]

this has to be an error: Pav Angle 40.5 (40.1-41.0)

the pictures dont support that range.

 

[Croton08]

What do you mean by an error, what angles does the pictures support then? The pics were taken from the website. So you are telling me the megasope analysis is wrong or the pics are fakes?

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 11/1/2005 8:00:26 AM
Author: Croton08
What do you mean by an error, what angles does the pictures support then? The pics were taken from the website. So you are telling me the megasope analysis is wrong or the pics are fakes?

id ask them to redo the megascope.
by the images it doesnt look like it has that huge a range in the pavilion.

 

[MissAva]

Could you post a link?

 

[Croton08]

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=130&item=315309

 

[Thegroom]

I would tend to agree wiht strmrdr. Looks like a screwy megascope result. Look at the AGS report...they give it a 41.0 pavilion angle (significantly different than 40.5). Combine that with ideal symmetry and a good idealscope photo, I would say the megascope is off. Like strmrdr said, have them re-run it.

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 11/1/2005 11:25:43 AM
Author: Croton08
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=130&item=315309

now with the rest of the story i see im right.
The megascope report is either the wrong one or a bad run.