|
|
|
|
Hello Alkaloids.
![]() I'm not very good at scrutinizing IS/ASET images for emerald cuts, so I'll leave that bit for someone who is. I did want to show you a setting that Stepcutgirl posted a few weeks ago. I don't know who makes it, perhaps she does, but it instantly came to mind when you were talking about the baguettes and an emerald center. Good luck in your quest and welcome to Pricescope! ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, for what I''d seen, it sounded like cut/polish of good is very adequate and not really included in the cut classes scale that I''ve been able to find on here (I don''t know what it''s called, but it breaks things to 1A, 1B, etc).
This one at James Allen looks pretty interesting, though probably it''s the absurd long-ness of it that makes is so cheap: Item # 1097375 Shape Emerald Weight 0.93 Color D Clarity VS1 Polish Very Good Symmetry Good Fluorescence Faint Measurements 9.28 * 3.83 * 2.67 Price $ 3,140.00 It has a picture you can view on their site but that seems even harder to pull off. It''s here: http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/D-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Emerald-Diamond-1097375.asp But for now I''m going to say pass. Interesting, though, to be sure... |
|
|
|
|
You are right, sometimes. It all comes down to the look of the diamond. In the pictures the diamond seems to have more light return on one side rather than being equall on both sides. When I look at it I am trying to figure out why it looks off, not why its so beautiful, which is what you want, I believe. The patterns don''t look symmetrical to me in the GOG pics which I believe is one of the most important things in an EC. At first I thought it might have been the tilt on the diamond but it is the same in all the pictures. The one on JA is not worth your consideration in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
I''d want to see an ASET on this one: http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-VS2-Ideal-Cut-Emerald-Diamond-1140952.asp
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, as I looked at it more I saw what you meant about it being asymmetrical looking. Thank you for pointing that out and I''ll get WF to pull the other. |
|
|
|
|
That one, with its L:W ratio of 1.25 is I think too square. I talked to James at WF just now and they are going to have pictures for me by tomorrow. How terrifying and fun! =) |
|
|
|
|
its the stone but the good/good rating don''t have much to do with it. optical symmetry which is what is off isn''t graded on the report. |
|
|
|
|
I''ve enjoyed my interactions with WF and see myself sticking from them. Apparently of the diamonds I listed earlier, all are gone except the one from GOG, but that one seems less than ideal. Hrmph. I do think, though, that looking at it again it might just be an issue of the diamond being tilted in the photography, but it''s the same way in all of them, so I''m going to bet on asymmetric. So where it stands now I''m having this EC brought in by WF for imaging: 0.81 ct F IF - 1.43 L:W ratio - 64% table 62.2% depth - EX/EX polish/symmetry - M-TK girdle The specs all look good and I''m very very excited. About the suggestion to just go look at them, I''m finding it surprisingly tricky to find anywhere with a significant selection of EC''s on-hand. Is a well-cut EC that rare? Now I''m really starting to envy the H&A people. =) Also, I spent a bit of time last night with the GF browsing through the online stores for band types (in a purely "academic" sense of course) and so didn''t say or suggest anything, but she was excited. I think I''ll see what I can design once I have those baguettes in-hand. Any other suggestions from anyone so far? |
|
|
|
|
I''m actually "in the market" for a halo-ed EC myself (we have the stone, and are going to start talking/shopping/pricing settings soon too.)
Since you want to use the family baguettes, that''s a different kind of halo than what I''d presume she saw at Costco (micropave, beadset, fishtail, etc??) There''s some yummy eye candy there, of all places! Daniel K makes a baguette halo ![]() Would something in that vein jibe with what you''re picturing? |
|
|
|
|
I like both of your suggestions a lot. And yes, the ones at costco were probably micropave, but I didn''t really know much at the time (a few weeks ago) and last night looking at the rings she seemed to favor more of the non-halo settings where the emerald just really stood out. Much more like the ring pictured nearer the top of this thread. So maybe I will use some of the (tapered - though I''m not sure how much yet) baguettes just on the band, but do instead of just one length-wise, two. Or would that be strange? It would make it so that the second was nearly always occluded by her other fingers, but it might be kind of unique and cool.
And if I go with a much more simple setting like that, I think I can stretch upward a bit on my diamond budget, and so am considering this diamond I also found at WF, though of course I need to find pictures: Report: GIA . Shape: Emerald . Carat: 0.91 . Depth %: 60.2 . Table %: 60 . Girdle: - . Measurements: 7.13-4.75X2.86 . Polish: Very Good . Symmetry: Very Good . Culet: None . Fluorescence: None I do love that it''s one of few diamonds I''m considering that is actually more than 7mm tall and it also has what look to be great proportions. At least on paper. I think I will ask them to get it for photographs, too. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
So, update.
I have a diamond getting to WF today or tomorrow to be photographed. I'll post pictures when I have it, but it seems pretty likely. That is super exciting. We were shopping for my mom something for her birthday, so went to the jeweler I've been talking to and was just like, "Let's go look at rings." It was super cute and she had a lot of fun and we finally found the one that she just totally loved. More than all the others, she just loved it far and away more than the rest. There are a couple of problems, though. The setting is for a square diamond, and though it looked awesome with the EC in there, I don't think that one would take an EC. I thought about an asscher, but it looks like they are even tougher to get a good one than an EC, and more expensive. It used baguettes on the side, which is good, but they are straight, and not tapered. I got the set of tapered baguettes from my mom and there are 10 of them. It would be really really nice to use them in this ring. I got sizes of them, and there are 2 that are almost perfect matches, then another 4 (though one is chipped pretty badly and so probably unusable), and then a set of 4 that is pretty similar, though one is about .3mm longer than the others. The baguettes are: 2x 4.7x1.9x1.4 3x 4.25x1.7x1.4 3x 3.3x1.6x1.3 1x 3.5x1.7x1.1 The thing she loved about the ring - probably one of the most important things - is that it looks light, airy, and fragile. But then it also has tons of sparkle. So lots of sparkle, not a lot of heft. Most of the baguette/halo rings tended to be pretty hefty... I guess this is a 'common prong' setting where almost all the metal is underneath? I took a photo of it, but it didn't really come out. I then came back today and did a sketch of my impressions of it, and kind of what I'm thinking of how to change it. I don't know, though, how expensive it will be to change/custom make this. I'm thinking "expensive" and I may need to come up with more $$ for my ring budget. I do feel, though, like it would be worth it if we can use these other elements that will make it more even more personal. Anyway, here's my sketch:
|
|
|
|
|
Crown height is 11.4%.
To me it doesn''t look that great because there''s not really much red/blue contrast in the middle of the long section and that whole black area on the middle of the bottom quadrant? What''s the word there? I''d love to hear what you have to say about it though stormrdr as I''ve gone through and read most of your posts and about step cut diamonds, as well as really liked your journal entries.
|