|
|
|
|
The round side stone on the right seems like a Diamond that was cut way after 1920... And I would assume that Asscher''s cut back then would possess a "much" smaller table!!! The culet (facet) does show it might be an old stone!!! |
|
|
|
|
Thanks DiaGem! That''s very helpful, I''m very curious to find out the history on this stone and will be relieved once Birks fills me in. What is the "facet"??
We bought this ring mainly for the stones and I am planning on making the asscher into a solitaire ring and the supporting diamonds into earrings, I''m going to stick with Birks to get this done to keep the ring as original as possible. Tracy |
|
|
|
|
Took another pic of the setting, sorry it''s not the greatest quality. After reading everything I can find on Asschers I have come to the conclusion that this is not a Royal Asscher but instead a traditional Asscher (still cut by the House of Asscher) Nonetheless I absolutely LOVE these stones and it will make my dream E-ring!!
|
|
|
|
|
????hummm.... |
|
|
|
|
Anything specific you would want to know? Dont get me wrong..., but I have not seen an Asscher Cut with a large table that was cut by the Asscher Family or any of their licensees... |
|
|
|
|
How many Asschers cut by the Asscher family have you actually seen?? Mine looks exactly like this one r/o
http://www.diamondsourceva.com/Education/Shape/diamonds-shape-asscher-cut.asp And like I said before Birks is the only store in Canada authorized to sell Asscher cut diamonds from the House of Asscher in Amsterdam. :) |