|
|
|
|
Ouch...the thing that makes this complicated is that you were in Switzerland. In the US you certainly have rights, but I don''t know what those are in Switzerland.
Have you spoken with the original jeweler? I would start there and see if they are willing to compensate you. Then, if you paid by credit card, call your company and see if it''s too late to do a chargeback as you paid for an item and received a different one... Hopefully one of the appraisers will chime in here and have more ideas... |
|
|
|
|
Ditto that. Hang in there Alexis, we will be able to get you some help, but lets see what one of the expert appraisers has to say, someone should be along presently and be able to advise you. |
|
|
|
|
thank you so much, am glad that people at least agree it is not right... hoping an appraiser will have some advice for us.
yes, we have gotten all the emails together and have them saying everything that i listed including the original specifications of the ''lost cert''. my fiance is looking into swiss law ... unfortunately he is blaming himself for not being ''more careful'' but I don''t feel he did anything wrong. so sad hopefully we can resolve it. we will call next week after we get a bit more advice here on how to approach it. |
|
|
|
|
I’m not sure I can offer much assistance. Your ‘rights’ are going to be a function of Swiss law, a subject I know nothing at all about. I do think you are being a bit over the top here. ‘Planning’ on talking to the owner is not sufficient. You need to talk to him about it. Soon would be a good schedule. I would start by politely explaining what the problem is, what you would like as a resolution and listen to what he has to say. Sometimes that's all it takes.
Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA Professional Appraisals in Denver |
|
|
|
|
Hello Alexis,
Your situation is indeed a complex one...I agree with Neil that you need to act quickly and contact the seller with your concerns. To all diamond consumers who follow and read PS threads on a regular basis: INSIST on receiving your original laboratory document (not a copy) at the time of purchase. Not later AND NOT in the mail. This has been a fairly consistent problem that seems to be getting more attention of late. Not every jewelry store has perfect record keeping. Promises to send appraisals and lab documents are just that.. "promises." And "promises" are only as good as the employee or owner who makes them. You wouldn''t think of taking ownership of a "pedigree" dog without proper documentation. Why would anyone do the same with a much more expensive item (diamond)? Not lecturing here...just concerned that consumers need to be aware that people sometimes forget to deliver on their promises...everyone leads a busy life and communication often fails. Please keep us posted. www.metrojewelryappraisers.com
Jeff Averbook, G.G.
Graduate Gemologist since 1986. Member NAJA. Life Member AIN. www.metrojewelryappraisers.com |
|
|
|
|
Yes there is a big price difference between an E and a H. |
|
|
|
|
Alexis~I''m a little confused by your post. You said that you bought a diamond that had been graded E VS1 by GIA and the vendor didn''t give you the report. After visiting the jeweler in NY, did you have the diamond unmounted and sent to the GIA for grading? I''m just trying understand what occurred before commenting further. I''m sorry you are having such a problem with your diamond and your ring.
|
|
|
|
|
My understanding is they promised an E/VS1/GIA but actually delivered an H/VS1/GIA. She agreed to accept an E/VS1/EGL as a substitute. 8 months later she discovered that this difference is important. Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA Professional Appraisals in Denver |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification, Neil. |
|
|
|
|
thanks for your comments so far. i will clarify on the certificate side.
when we first saw the ring they said it was E/VS1 and they had a GIA cert. then they said they couldn''t locate it b.c all the diamonds were moved from a different safe. we asked for a GIA. they said it would take 3mths cause it was Christmas and that EGL was just as good. so they sent it to EGL and it came back F/ VVS. we agreed on the basis of this cert and their original description (which they vouched for). they agreed to pay for a GIA cert if we ever wanted one in the future. we moved to NY, the stone came loose so we thought it was a good time to remove the stone and give it in to GIA. it then came back H/VS1 please can anyone give their opinion on whether it is reasonable given all the steps described to get a refund? can they just say that certifications are different and they are not responsible?? we definitely don''t want a replacement as we have awful associations with it now. also, what sort of price difference are we talking about ... can they just argue it is not a huge diff and we have had it for 8mths? thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Yes, you should be entitled to a refund - but whether you will get one is another story. Essentially I guess the issue is you did agree to take the EGL one..
It makes thousands of $ difference. Please be confident and persistent when you call the owner - they sent it to EGL as they knew it would get a "softer" grade. |
|
|
|
|
The first diamond is an F/VVS2
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-608068.htm The second is an H/VS1 http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-1466982.htm You can get some idea as of the difference in price ~ Not an exact science, there are just too many variables. |
|
|
|
|
Do you have any documentation stating that the ring was originally graded E VS1 by the GIA? Was there an ID# on the girdle of the diamond that corresponds to the original GIA report? At least with some written documentation, you could show that the jeweler misrepresented the stone, I would think. I'm not a lawyer, so don't quote me on that.
|
|
|
|
|
RS, I''m just guessing of course, but I would doubt it ever was graded by the GIA.. If that were the case, it would''ve been easier for the store to just get a duplicate rather than pay to have it regraded.. I imagine they thought alexis would never take them up on their GIA offer, especially since they were not residents. Of course, I am just speculating though ! Good point though, definately something for Alexis to follow up on with her vendor.. |
|
|
|
|
Hi to another night owl I think you are probably right. If they had the diamond graded by the GIA, there should have been a report to begin with. If Alexis doesn''t have any documentation, I wonder what her options are
|
|
|
|
|
we have an email from them saying listing that the diamond is E/ VS1 ''as per the GIA certificate... i am assuming that shows they misrepresented the stone as we made our final decision to purchase based on that information (they are a very reputable store) in addition to the EGL cert.
i also now suspect they did not have a certificate - which is incredible given their reputation. i also now wonder if they have a friend at EGL Antwerp... i just can''t understand how it can be graded so differently. it has just put everything into question unfortunately.... any ideas on how we could respond if they suggest replacing the stone - we really don''t want to deal with them anymore and obviously don''t trust them anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Hi marian - actually, its sunny and nice here, in Australia, lol..but yes, you should go to bed honey !I know, its a tough one.. |
|
|
|
|
alexis, I think you have a good argument, due to the fact you have it in writing. It is possible they have a "friend", but also most EGL labs are well known for being softer on colour and clarity grades than GIA/AGS, and can be up to a couple grades off on both. Unfortunately, you have found out the hard way that a big reputation doesn''t always make for an honest vendor. Many people will just believe what they tell them, and don''t educate themselves to know any better.I can understand completely not wanting to deal with them any longer, neither would I. Just make sure you are firm in your resolve, and let them know you are disappointed, and feel more confident buying locally in the US for your replacement. If they make you an offer and you''re not sure, you can bring it back here for more advice from the experts. I don''t know how it works there, but it may be worth emailing/calling your local consumer office just to find out what, if any, your rights are? |
|
|
|
|
GIA is pretty good at recognizing stones that they’ve seen before, at least if the first grading was within the last few years. There is always the possibility that they simply screwed up on one or the other gradings, but I would seriously doubt that they would grade a stone first as an E and then again as an H. By all means if they can produce the GIA/E paperwork then your problem is with GIA, not the dealer. Personally, I think it’s highly unlikely that the first grading ever happened.
Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA Professional Appraisals in Denver |
|
|
|
|
i agree that it was never GIA graded - infact we confirmed it with GIA, they said they could not see their number (or any number on it) and couldn''t recognise it .... which means they not only misrepresented the stone, they blatantly lied. really hope this means we have rights (given we have this in writing from them). the lady we have dealt with (vice president i think) has just been so rude and condescending when we have had contact about the stone being loose and getting the extra grading etc that we are predicting it will be a battle and they will try and play it down. i guess we just want to be ready with all the info so that we are not bullied. this forum has helped me to be sure that it is a ''real'' issue at least. our major problem at this point is getting to speak to the owner who we have been told previously is ''too busy'' and we were told we could not have his number by the VP. we will definately be including a separate complaint about this woman''s service - she has made a very special experience a nightmare in more ways than one.
going to (try) to get through to him tomorrow if we can get past her so i will give feedback on what they say initially. we have decided whatever happens we are going to continue until they take it seriously even if it means getting lawyers involved. thanks for the help so far. |
|
|
|
|
why dont you disclose the name of the business you are having problems with. Someone may know the company--a little publicity never hurt anything in these situations |
|
|
|
|
yes, will definitely list the company if they don''t fix it quickly and apologise. i guess i don''t want to give them bad publicity until we speak with them and know for sure that there isn''t another explanation (can''t think what it would be at the moment!).
can anyone tell me if diamond prices changed much in the last 8mths? are we going to find that we are paying a lot more now for a new diamond than 8mths ago? looks like we may be stuck with both the emotional side of taking back our engagement ring after 8mths and a more expense purchase (albeit a better price for the right ring!). |
|
|
|
|
The other explanation is that you agreed to accept the grading opinions of EGL-International as an acceptable substitute for GIA in order to do your deal more quickly and, based on this agreement, that’s what they delivered. Frankly, it's a pretty good argument. I would hold in check the fingerpointing and threats of lawsuits and public embarrassment and appeal to their sense of good customer relations. You're unhappy, you've got a good reason to be unhappy, and it would sure be nice of them to fix it. Please. ![]() You can always raise the volume later if that doesn't work. Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA Professional Appraisals in Denver |